- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] https approaches?

by madis

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Ami Fischman wrote: > Hi there, > > SSL support is one of the biggest lacks in dillo for me. To that end, > I'm thinking of adding it in. Without knowing the dillo codebase, I see two > obvious options: > 1) Add a src/IO/https.c file based on src/IO/http.c > 2) Move http.c to using openssl's BIO's which can support either encrypted > or clear traffic, as well as filters. Imho it should be a plugin or something alike to avoid bloating dillo with ssl specific code. Current dpi does not support sending raw http to dillo, so maybe simplest solution would be to create pseudo-proxy for https, which sends https queries in unencrypted form to unix socket sitting in ~/.dillo/. Local proxy would then do the actual encryption (some authentication may be required to ensure that both dillo and proxy are actually runned by same user). -- mzz

March 14, 2003

https approaches?

by Ami Fischman

Hi there, SSL support is one of the biggest lacks in dillo for me. To that end, I'm thinking of adding it in. Without knowing the dillo codebase, I see two obvious options: 1) Add a src/IO/https.c file based on src/IO/http.c 2) Move http.c to using openssl's BIO's which can support either encrypted or clear traffic, as well as filters. 1 seems much more straightforward and will result in quicker https support, but will cause there to be a whole hell of a lot of code duplication between http.c & https.c. 2 seems like the more "moral" choice and will make dillo better, at the cost of making openssl necessary for dillo builds. Is anyone currently working on ssl support in dillo? Are you using either of the above two options? If the answer to the first question is negative, do people have feelings about code duplication vs. reliance on openssl? (of course, there's a third option of #ifdef'ing the hell out of http.c, adding BIO support that can be compiled out leaving the current plain socket-based code, but that would probably be more of a nightmare to maintain than 1) above). Cheers, -- Ami Fischman usenet(a)fischman.org

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Incorrect rendering of tables on fresco.org

by Sebastian Geerken

On Thu, Mar 13, Thorben Thuermer wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:25:53 +1100 > TheStar <thestar(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > > > I have noticed that the tables at fresco.org are rendered > > incorrectly - in particular the "introduction" page. > > > > All the tables become _very_ thin - is this a non-standard page, or > > a to-be-worked bug in dillo? > > after some more looking at it, the problem is that the cell containing > the actual content is declared as: <td width="" valign="top"> and dillo > seems to give the empty width a lower priority than anything else, instead > of ignoring it like other browsers seem to. Dillo treats this as 0, as soon as the attribute "width" exists, which normally means that a column is rendered as narrow as possible (this is called "size hint" in the documentation). The latter is not actually the case, but dillo's table rendering is still neccessary to improve. (This is just how dillo behaves, not how it should behave.) Sebastian

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Incorrect rendering of tables on fresco.org

by TheStar

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:17:49 +0100 Thorben Thuermer <r00t(a)Informatik.Uni-Bremen.DE> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:25:53 +1100 > TheStar <thestar(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > > > I have noticed that the tables at fresco.org are rendered > > incorrectly - in particular the "introduction" page. > > > > All the tables become _very_ thin - is this a non-standard page, or > > a to-be-worked bug in dillo? > > after some more looking at it, the problem is that the cell containing > the actual content is declared as: <td width="" valign="top"> and dillo > seems to give the empty width a lower priority than anything else, instead > of ignoring it like other browsers seem to. I'll alert the fresco team about that - thanks :)

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo source

by Kelson Vibber

At 08:29 AM 3/13/2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: >On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 slymer(a)slymer.org wrote: > > Why doesn't dillo also come in tar.bz2 archives ? > For compatibility reasons. Why not provide both? I've seen a lot of projects that provide both a .tar.gz and a .tar.bz2 (and some of them even still provide a .tar.Z). You'll need a bit more storage for hosting, but if enough people choose the .bz2 version, you'll save on bandwidth. Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo source

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, higuita wrote: > [...] Nice signature! Cheers Jorge.-

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo source

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 slymer(a)slymer.org wrote: > > Why doesn't dillo also come in tar.bz2 archives ? > For us dialupers even the 72Kb diff between gzipped and bzipped > counts. For compatibility reasons. There're lots of platforms in which dillo runs. We can assume they have gzip (and _maybe_ bzip2). If they all were to have bzip2, then there would be no problem. Cheers Jorge.-

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Incorrect rendering of tables on fresco.org

by Thorben Thuermer

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:25:53 +1100 TheStar <thestar(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > I have noticed that the tables at fresco.org are rendered > incorrectly - in particular the "introduction" page. > > All the tables become _very_ thin - is this a non-standard page, or > a to-be-worked bug in dillo? after some more looking at it, the problem is that the cell containing the actual content is declared as: <td width="" valign="top"> and dillo seems to give the empty width a lower priority than anything else, instead of ignoring it like other browsers seem to. Thorben Thuermer

March 13, 2003

iso-8859-2

by Wojciech Karaś

I can't see iso-8859-2 fonts in my dillo. Is it possible to use *-iso-8859-2 fonts, to display pages? -- W.Karas tel:0048(12)411-52-22(home),0048(12)617-25-88(work) mailto:karas@uci.agh.edu.pl http://gollum.uci.agh.edu.pl visit 'aid for polish children' site http://www.pajacyk.pl

March 13, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] .7.1.2 ??

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Frank W McCormick wrote: > Just dl'ed 0.7.1.2...but the dir inside says 0.7.1.1 . Built it > anyway. Which version do I have ?? The dir inside should be "0.7.1", and you have the "0.7.1.2" release. (that is: 0.7.1 with just one line changed). Cheers Jorge.-

March 12, 2003