- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore renamed: www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. Thanks! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 19, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:26:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > I hope you'll find it interesting that that bug is now marked: RESOLVED WONTFIX https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c2 "What if you want dillo, but not libXft or everything else it pulls in?" (Jeroen Roovers) -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 18, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:57:31PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:22:15PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 > > > > That was a dillo-3.1-dev issue. > After masking it in my portage, I emerged dillo-3.0.5, and as you can > see in the bug, posting is possible (mostly): > ( link same as already given above ) > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 Nope! Have a look: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180#c8 (and that was with 3.0.5) > > -- > Miroslav Rovis > Zagreb, Croatia > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 18, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:22:15PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > It just happened, minutes ago. > > Easily seen in its effects: > > toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 > > (notice that also emerg --info that I attached has, instead of > spaces, the Α displayed, such as: > > https://555180.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=406994 > 2.6-r1::gentoosys-devel/autoconf: ... > ) > > However, as I immediately after posted on: > > Mutt without Portage/in Local Overlay > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781834 > where the exactly same text can be perfectly readable as it is > wrapped just fine, and which I explain in the immediately > following post in the same topic: > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781838 > > Could that Dillo's fault? > > The whole session of what happened online from my going online, to > logging into Bugzilla, the entire posting, end the surprising look > at what the post came out like, all is in these: > > 6d8bc1e8d0868d6864d4beb8678e13a533e813cc6f2a26ff1a14cb7cced1aec5 > dump_150717_1211_g0n.pcap > dc465d190560a5b7a058a2d1f996d43ef68e032fb66e4be1b265a5bfdab95630 > Screen_150717_1211_g0n.mkv > > (the traffic dump and the screencast) > > just in case we would need to analyze what happened. > > The Dillo is the same one, like I built it back when I wrote my: > > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html > (haven't updated it since) > That was a dillo-3.1-dev issue. After masking it in my portage, I emerged dillo-3.0.5, and as you can see in the bug, posting is possible (mostly): ( link same as already given above ) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 17, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

It just happened, minutes ago. Easily seen in its effects: toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 (notice that also emerg --info that I attached has, instead of spaces, the Α displayed, such as: https://555180.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=406994 2.6-r1::gentoosys-devel/autoconf: ... ) However, as I immediately after posted on: Mutt without Portage/in Local Overlay https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781834 where the exactly same text can be perfectly readable as it is wrapped just fine, and which I explain in the immediately following post in the same topic: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781838 Could that Dillo's fault? The whole session of what happened online from my going online, to logging into Bugzilla, the entire posting, end the surprising look at what the post came out like, all is in these: 6d8bc1e8d0868d6864d4beb8678e13a533e813cc6f2a26ff1a14cb7cced1aec5 dump_150717_1211_g0n.pcap dc465d190560a5b7a058a2d1f996d43ef68e032fb66e4be1b265a5bfdab95630 Screen_150717_1211_g0n.mkv (the traffic dump and the screencast) just in case we would need to analyze what happened. The Dillo is the same one, like I built it back when I wrote my: A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html (haven't updated it since) Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 17, 2015

Dillo 3.0.5 released

by eocene＠gmx.com

Jeremy wrote: > Are there any new config files that should be described? Nope.

July 14, 2015

Dillo 3.0.5 released

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

eocene wrote: > > All right, release is official... Linux From Scratch project wiki page updated: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/dillo3 Are there any new config files that should be described? Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 14, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:34:24AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > And on Gentoo, it's the local overlay way for me to go. Studying to be > > able to accomplish that. > > I'm also a Gentoo user; not even a C programmer, let alone a > developer. I'd be interested in your ebuild. A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html And, Walter, I hope you noticed I gave you credit for my figuring out the bug in the current version at: Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 13, 2015

Fonts not found issue persists in 3.0.5

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 05:29:20PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:19:11PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > See this issue below? > > > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:29:18AM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > > I got the new Dillo version 3.0.5 (in the master air-gapped box, which I > > > yet have to clone onto this, for online, same hardware box), as it is > > > available in gentoo: > > > > > > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/dillo/ > > > > > > but my problem with fonts (the FAQ issue > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q27) to which eocene has kindly given the > > > tip for in his message: > > > > > > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-April/010500.html > > > > > > > And we thought: > > > For people reading this message offline, I'll paste his advice, since it is > > > also important: > > > > > > If you go to dw/fltkplatform.cc and, in FltkFont::initSystemFonts(), > > > remove the leading underscore in > > > _MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", > > > to get > > > MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", > > > and recompile, what does dillo say when you run it? > > > > > > > But we were wrong! And it was only something an unimaginative person > > like me can be capable of not figuring out despite urgent need and > > sincere desire because of that urgent need (my eyes have been hurting > > from the fixed not-much-more-than ASCII font that was all I've seen in, > > what?, a few months? > > > > We were wrong! It only needed that the fltk be recompiled with, guess > > what?, with the the XFT font renederer! > > > > That was the sole missing thing. > > I'm glad you finally nailed the issue, and have proper fonts. > > > > But I think I am going to file a bug on Gentoo Bugzilla about this! > > (But if anybody can tell a reason that justifies the xft use flag not > > being the default, pls. do tell me... in which case my filing the bug > > would not make sense; I don't see such reason though.) > > I neither see a reason for this... > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- Thanx, boss! I think I found what was missing in the Gentoo ebuild, and I may have reported correctly on the Bugzilla: Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 I tried to give credit where it was due, and you can find Walter Dnes name in the bug report above ;-) . Because this triggered my understanding,[...] > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:34:24AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: ... > > You also have to have x11-libs/fltk on > > your system. For fltk, the "xft" USE flag is strongly recommended. I > > wonder if the "opengl" and "threads" USE flags would help fltk+dillo. [...]and the snippet of the dawning conversation can be found on: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-July/010594.html Cheers! On another note, still wrecking my nerves: it's a real torture accessing and posting bugs.gentoo.org with my current setup or with the something missing in dillo. It sure will take me time to really figure and deploy on my Gentoo the ebuilds in my local overlay with the current mercurial code (slowly making progress there too), so only then I'll know if the issue has been fixed in it... Just, in case anyone could see any reasons for the thousands per minute cookies.dpi lines as described in my Grsecurity Forums Dillo topic: Deploy RBAC on Dillo browser https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4228 where my current policy for Dillo is at: https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4228#p15372 Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 12, 2015

Fonts not found issue persists in 3.0.5

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:19:11PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > See this issue below? > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:29:18AM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > I got the new Dillo version 3.0.5 (in the master air-gapped box, which I > > yet have to clone onto this, for online, same hardware box), as it is > > available in gentoo: > > > > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/dillo/ > > > > but my problem with fonts (the FAQ issue > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q27) to which eocene has kindly given the > > tip for in his message: > > > > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-April/010500.html > > > > And we thought: > > For people reading this message offline, I'll paste his advice, since it is > > also important: > > > > If you go to dw/fltkplatform.cc and, in FltkFont::initSystemFonts(), > > remove the leading underscore in > > _MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", > > to get > > MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", > > and recompile, what does dillo say when you run it? > > > > But we were wrong! And it was only something an unimaginative person > like me can be capable of not figuring out despite urgent need and > sincere desire because of that urgent need (my eyes have been hurting > from the fixed not-much-more-than ASCII font that was all I've seen in, > what?, a few months? > > We were wrong! It only needed that the fltk be recompiled with, guess > what?, with the the XFT font renederer! > > That was the sole missing thing. I'm glad you finally nailed the issue, and have proper fonts. > But I think I am going to file a bug on Gentoo Bugzilla about this! > (But if anybody can tell a reason that justifies the xft use flag not > being the default, pls. do tell me... in which case my filing the bug > would not make sense; I don't see such reason though.) I neither see a reason for this... -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 11, 2015