- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Dillo on FreeBSD ARM

by usenet＠ulrich-grey.de

Hello, I want to inform you that I have built dillo-3.0.4.1 on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r287459M ARM platform using FreeBSD ports. This is remarkable because all non-text browsers I have tried are crashing on ARM. (Example: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202775) With dillo I am able to surf the internet the first time using my Cubox. Regards Ulrich

Sept. 5, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:16:25AM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr wrote: ... > BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or > is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can > be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, > they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). You can see it in the comment that I just posted: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c12 The '' that you can see aplenty is what my newlines turned into. I always screencast and dumpcap, so I could prove I really just normally typed in my comment, with newlines. -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Sept. 1, 2015

javascript

by brucembeach＠gmail.com

Hello everybody The following emails for some reaseon never made to the list so I am resending them. ---------------- Email 1 ---------------------------------------- James C wrote: >> src/table.hh might be a reasonable place to start thinking >> about the requirements for integrating a new set of tags. Don't know. I looked at it. Are you sure you meant table.hh? I'm not sure that any new tags would actually be added anyway. If anything I would look at Html_tag_open_script(...) { Html_tag_close_script(...) { as likely candidates for a starting point. I did get binaries for iceweasel that worked. 285 files @ 21M and all I do is click: "accept" Thats it. Close the browser(and the chroot, since i can't get it working otherwise) and start dillo. I don't need javascript again until the lease expires about 20hrs later. Bruce --------------- Email 2 ---------------------------------------- James C wrote > Do you have dtrace, dtruss or strace, to look for open() to see > where JavaScript is writing its state? That's my guess about > why you'd need a chroot or similar. I have strace, but the reason I need the chroot is that the library versions for iceweasel don't match the versions on my system and the files are all over the place. Iceweasel will eventually go away. Right now getting the glue between dillo and duktake is beginning to look pretty good but I have run into a puzzle of a different kind. I put a print statement in Html_tag_open_script and Html_tag_close_script and indeed you see "in Html_tag_open_script" and "Html_tag_close_script" every time the script tag is encountered. Now if I load that signon page I get a blank screen and the messages are -> not <- displayed, and the stop Icon stays permanently on. Looking at the code I find the tag <noscript> <meta HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" content="0; url=https://guestportal.burnaby.ca/login_noscript.html"> </noscript> If I delete these lines dillo loads the page normally and every thing is fine. Looking in the table in html.cc I find: const TagInfo Tags[] = ... ... /* noscript 1011 */ ... ... blindly replaceing this line with: {"script", B8(111001),'R',2, Html_tag_open_script,NULL,Html_tag_close_script}, and changing "script" to "noscript" on the assumtion that when dillo hits the tag </noscript> it will then just continue until it hits </noscript>, throw away the data and then continue on, which it apparently does. The question is what to do about it. If it is something that is going to be implemented but nobody has got around to it then I would at least put in a: Html_tag_open_noscript() and a Html_tag_close_noscript() so that web pages don't stall when dillo hits that tag. Bruce

Aug. 31, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

Looking it up at: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/thread.html @Plmalternate Pls., do not get me wrong. It took me a while to figure out that your initial email was: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size ? http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010633.html and that the next one was: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010636.html but in a different thread (that's the reason for not only my confusion --you don't read every email in every thread if you're short of time) And only then there is this thread to which I am forwarding this message. I see and I hope you might even, maybe, compile, the UI fonts, so you are not a newbie like I thought you were. My mistake was not out of lack of respect. (salutations in bottom) On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 03:47:15PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:08:53PM -0400, Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > > @ Miroslav Rovis: > > Thank you, sir. I did not, at first, perceive that your comments were > > addressed to me, but assumed they followed up on some topic raised > > before I joined the list. > They did so. They intend to belong to anoother thread if it becomes a > thread. And if it does, it ought to be under subject: > > Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010635.html > > LATER NOTE: or maybe you are talking about the other thread by the subject: > Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010634.html > > which does have converging (or common) points, with your issues. > > But pls. don't worry, but rather keep up your efforts to learn, instead. > > ++++ > You need to reply to the digest e-mail, when you post a question, by > also changing the subject line to reflect your query, as it says in the > digest, which you left in your email, you can find it in the text > further below, and here it is for your convenience: > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." > ++++ > You can see that Jorge Arellano Cid, the leader of the Dillo project, > changed the cubject line when he replied to you, to read; > > LATER NOTE (on second sending: also pls. reply to this mail, and to the > list, not like I replying only to you, in hurry as I was). > > Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size > > and you can see I changed the subject line to read like Jorge did, to > keep it the same. > > Also, you need to reply to emails by hitting the "Reply" button, so that > it is visible what email you are replying to, by the simple fact that > the text of that email is contained in the email of yours, like Jorge > did, and like I did. See, your email is within this email of mine. > > But now that I have clicked your links, I > > think maybe they were. But I confess that I have not yet been able to > > understand. Are you saying I should change something in the source and > > recompile Dillo? If so, would you mind saying exactly what file and > > how I should change it? > I don't know how much time I can set aside, as I really have other > issues, and real-world problems, but I might try to help you a little... > > But pls. do your best, as this is a developers' mailing list. Else we > may be of distraction to the developers... And also, be patient. The > other real-world issues may cause some delay in my replying to you. > > I am only a wishful tester for their work, maybe I am not yet at the > necessary level myself... > > > > I don't care so much that the fonts be pretty, just legible without > > having to touch my nose to the monitor. > ***Oh, no, now I see this!*** > > And I know, I remember so well, how I had to rub my nose into my monitor > to see the fonts! No, this is (probably) not a UI issue, Jorge, if you > are reading, it's not! This is a fonts not scalable issue (probably!... > > I'm assuming you are using some kind of Linux. Are you? > Let's first see, if you can find the file in your home directory, do > this, as user, not as root: > > cd /home/<replacer-this-with-your-username>/.dillo > > And with the next command, you ought to see something like: > > ls -l > total 36 > -rw------- 1 miro miro 67 2015-07-04 15:29 cookiesrc > -rw------- 1 miro miro 173 2015-08-28 18:36 cookies.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 13984 2015-08-28 19:52 dillorc > -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 990 2015-02-15 07:00 domainrc > -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 157 2015-02-15 07:00 dpidrc > -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 2935 2015-02-15 07:00 keysrc > > Let me read your reply and explanation of what you see, and esp. if you > can, maybe, now, understand, what I explained in the: > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… > > that is, to edit, with a normal editor in Linux, such as Vim, Emacs, > Nano, or such, the line that reads (something like): > > [[ I use Vim, but you can use any editor you like ]] > > #font_factor=1.0 > > ,,,You can change that line to read, maybe: > > font_factor=1.5 > > for starters... > > (my salute is in bottom) > > > > On 8/29/15, dillo-dev-request at dillo.org <dillo-dev-request at dillo.org> wrote: > > > Send Dillo-dev mailing list submissions to > > > dillo-dev at dillo.org > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > dillo-dev-request at dillo.org > > > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > > dillo-dev-owner at dillo.org > > > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." > > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > > > 1. Re: UI font size (Jorge Arellano Cid) > > > 2. Re: Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size > > > (Plmalternate Plmalternate) > > > 3. Re: Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > > > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > > 4. Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration > > > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Message: 1 > > > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:10:25 -0300 > > > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] UI font size > > > Message-ID: <20150828151025.GB32592 at dillo.org> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > >> > > >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > > >> > > >> > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > > >> > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > > >> > > >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > > >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > > > > > > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > > > > > # Minimum font size > > > font_min_size=18 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers > > > Jorge.- > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 2 > > > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:50:10 -0400 > > > From: Plmalternate Plmalternate <plmalternate at gmail.com> > > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font > > > size > > > Message-ID: > > > <CAB2o_TGdQ6MMqQPseBWUTvdo6KdxiV2ZieXR1Xv-jMu0N31Ybw at mail.gmail.com> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > > >> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> > > >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > > >> > > >>> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > > >>> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > > >> > > >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > > >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Jeremy Henty > > > > > > Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each > > > time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 > > > with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. > > > > > > I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but > > > when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on > > > the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. > > > > > > Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text > > > buttons/menus: > > > > > > 1st bar: > > > "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" > > > 2nd bar left: > > > "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". > > > 2nd bar right: > > > "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" > > > > > > For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is > > > SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't > > > change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, > > > but that's just me. > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 3 > > > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:16:25 +0200 > > > From: miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > > > Message-ID: <20150829021625.GA8318 at g0n> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > > > wrote: > > >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > >> > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > > >> renamed: > > >> www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > > >> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > > >> There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't > > >> reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. > > >> > > > > > > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on > > > x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 > > > > > > Note also the link there to the Forums topic: > > > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > > > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 > > > where also notice the video: > > > > > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… > > > > > > in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely > > > wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX > > > attitude, in my opinion. > > > > > > BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or > > > is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can > > > be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, > > > they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). > > > > > > There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about > > > tonight, it's about: > > > Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? > > > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html > > > (but separately if I manage) > > > > > > I did my best. Regards! > > > -- > > > Miroslav Rovis > > > Zagreb, Croatia > > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr > > >

Aug. 30, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:08:53PM -0400, Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > @ Miroslav Rovis: > Thank you, sir. I did not, at first, perceive that your comments were > addressed to me, but assumed they followed up on some topic raised > before I joined the list. They did so. They intend to belong to anoother thread if it becomes a thread. And if it does, it ought to be under subject: Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010635.html LATER NOTE: or maybe you are talking about the other thread by the subject: Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-August/010634.html which does have converging (or common) points, with your issues. But pls. don't worry, but rather keep up your efforts to learn, instead. ++++ You need to reply to the digest e-mail, when you post a question, by also changing the subject line to reflect your query, as it says in the digest, which you left in your email, you can find it in the text further below, and here it is for your convenience: > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." ++++ You can see that Jorge Arellano Cid, the leader of the Dillo project, changed the cubject line when he replied to you, to read; LATER NOTE (on second sending: also pls. reply to this mail, and to the list, not like I replying only to you, in hurry as I was). Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size and you can see I changed the subject line to read like Jorge did, to keep it the same. Also, you need to reply to emails by hitting the "Reply" button, so that it is visible what email you are replying to, by the simple fact that the text of that email is contained in the email of yours, like Jorge did, and like I did. See, your email is within this email of mine. > But now that I have clicked your links, I > think maybe they were. But I confess that I have not yet been able to > understand. Are you saying I should change something in the source and > recompile Dillo? If so, would you mind saying exactly what file and > how I should change it? I don't know how much time I can set aside, as I really have other issues, and real-world problems, but I might try to help you a little... But pls. do your best, as this is a developers' mailing list. Else we may be of distraction to the developers... And also, be patient. The other real-world issues may cause some delay in my replying to you. I am only a wishful tester for their work, maybe I am not yet at the necessary level myself... > > I don't care so much that the fonts be pretty, just legible without > having to touch my nose to the monitor. ***Oh, no, now I see this!*** And I know, I remember so well, how I had to rub my nose into my monitor to see the fonts! No, this is (probably) not a UI issue, Jorge, if you are reading, it's not! This is a fonts not scalable issue (probably!... I'm assuming you are using some kind of Linux. Are you? Let's first see, if you can find the file in your home directory, do this, as user, not as root: cd /home/<replacer-this-with-your-username>/.dillo And with the next command, you ought to see something like: ls -l total 36 -rw------- 1 miro miro 67 2015-07-04 15:29 cookiesrc -rw------- 1 miro miro 173 2015-08-28 18:36 cookies.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 13984 2015-08-28 19:52 dillorc -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 990 2015-02-15 07:00 domainrc -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 157 2015-02-15 07:00 dpidrc -rw-r--r-- 1 miro miro 2935 2015-02-15 07:00 keysrc Let me read your reply and explanation of what you see, and esp. if you can, maybe, now, understand, what I explained in the: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… that is, to edit, with a normal editor in Linux, such as Vim, Emacs, Nano, or such, the line that reads (something like): [[ I use Vim, but you can use any editor you like ]] #font_factor=1.0 ,,,You can change that line to read, maybe: font_factor=1.5 for starters... (my salute is in bottom) > > On 8/29/15, dillo-dev-request at dillo.org <dillo-dev-request at dillo.org> wrote: > > Send Dillo-dev mailing list submissions to > > dillo-dev at dillo.org > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > dillo-dev-request at dillo.org > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > dillo-dev-owner at dillo.org > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: UI font size (Jorge Arellano Cid) > > 2. Re: Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size > > (Plmalternate Plmalternate) > > 3. Re: Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > 4. Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration > > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:10:25 -0300 > > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] UI font size > > Message-ID: <20150828151025.GB32592 at dillo.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > >> > >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > >> > >> > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > >> > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > >> > >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > > > > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > > > # Minimum font size > > font_min_size=18 > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Jorge.- > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:50:10 -0400 > > From: Plmalternate Plmalternate <plmalternate at gmail.com> > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font > > size > > Message-ID: > > <CAB2o_TGdQ6MMqQPseBWUTvdo6KdxiV2ZieXR1Xv-jMu0N31Ybw at mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > >> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> > >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > >> > >>> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > >>> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > >> > >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Jeremy Henty > > > > Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each > > time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 > > with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. > > > > I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but > > when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on > > the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. > > > > Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text > > buttons/menus: > > > > 1st bar: > > "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" > > 2nd bar left: > > "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". > > 2nd bar right: > > "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" > > > > For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is > > SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't > > change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, > > but that's just me. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:16:25 +0200 > > From: miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > > Message-ID: <20150829021625.GA8318 at g0n> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > >> > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > >> renamed: > >> www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > >> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > >> There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't > >> reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. > >> > > > > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on > > x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 > > > > Note also the link there to the Forums topic: > > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 > > where also notice the video: > > > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… > > > > in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely > > wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX > > attitude, in my opinion. > > > > BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or > > is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can > > be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, > > they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). > > > > There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about > > tonight, it's about: > > Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? > > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html > > (but separately if I manage) > > > > I did my best. Regards! > > -- > > Miroslav Rovis > > Zagreb, Croatia > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr > >

Aug. 30, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 01:33:28PM -0400, Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > > > # Minimum font size > > font_min_size=18 > > Thank you, sir. I have that set also. It affects only the text size > of the content of the html document (e.g., a web page) for me. UI font > is unaffected for me. Can anyone confirm that they have enlarged the > font size SPEFICALLY of the UI? I'm not averse to recompiling but I > don't know where to look in the source code. Ah, now I see. font_factor & friends and CSS affect rendered code not UI fonts. There's no dillorc option for this. If you can code C/C++, you may start in tipwin.cc, in CustButton::CustButton() function, and add something like: labelsize(18); then dig further in the code to resize the buttons (FLTK doesn't do it automatically), and remake them to your taste. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Aug. 30, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 12

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

@ Miroslav Rovis: Thank you, sir. I did not, at first, perceive that your comments were addressed to me, but assumed they followed up on some topic raised before I joined the list. But now that I have clicked your links, I think maybe they were. But I confess that I have not yet been able to understand. Are you saying I should change something in the source and recompile Dillo? If so, would you mind saying exactly what file and how I should change it? I don't care so much that the fonts be pretty, just legible without having to touch my nose to the monitor. On 8/29/15, dillo-dev-request at dillo.org <dillo-dev-request at dillo.org> wrote: > Send Dillo-dev mailing list submissions to > dillo-dev at dillo.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dillo-dev-request at dillo.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dillo-dev-owner at dillo.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: UI font size (Jorge Arellano Cid) > 2. Re: Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size > (Plmalternate Plmalternate) > 3. Re: Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > 4. Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:10:25 -0300 > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] UI font size > Message-ID: <20150828151025.GB32592 at dillo.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: >> >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: >> >> > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >> > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. >> >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > # Minimum font size > font_min_size=18 > > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:50:10 -0400 > From: Plmalternate Plmalternate <plmalternate at gmail.com> > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font > size > Message-ID: > <CAB2o_TGdQ6MMqQPseBWUTvdo6KdxiV2ZieXR1Xv-jMu0N31Ybw at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: >> >>> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >>> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. >> >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under >> "RENDERING SECTION"). >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeremy Henty > > Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each > time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 > with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. > > I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but > when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on > the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. > > Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text > buttons/menus: > > 1st bar: > "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" > 2nd bar left: > "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". > 2nd bar right: > "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" > > For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is > SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't > change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, > but that's just me. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:16:25 +0200 > From: miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > Message-ID: <20150829021625.GA8318 at g0n> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: >> > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore >> renamed: >> www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] >> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 >> There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't >> reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. >> > > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on > x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 > > Note also the link there to the Forums topic: > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 > where also notice the video: > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… > > in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely > wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX > attitude, in my opinion. > > BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or > is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can > be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, > they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). > > There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about > tonight, it's about: > Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html > (but separately if I manage) > > I did my best. Regards! > -- > Miroslav Rovis > Zagreb, Croatia > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr >

Aug. 30, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

> From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > # Minimum font size > font_min_size=18 Thank you, sir. I have that set also. It affects only the text size of the content of the html document (e.g., a web page) for me. UI font is unaffected for me. Can anyone confirm that they have enlarged the font size SPEFICALLY of the UI? I'm not averse to recompiling but I don't know where to look in the source code.

Aug. 29, 2015

Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

I'm a little too tired and really sleepy, but I mention that I hope the Dillo developers will be able to tell me more on the issues that I thoroughly investigated, and posted a lot of captures and screencasts to document it. Please see, discarding what it unnecessary, the forum topic: Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html (esp. the post just posted an hour ago or so) and find it documented at: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/ I did my best. Regards! Good night! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Aug. 29, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > renamed: > www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't > reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 Note also the link there to the Forums topic: A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 where also notice the video: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX attitude, in my opinion. BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about tonight, it's about: Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html (but separately if I manage) I did my best. Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Aug. 29, 2015