- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 12

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

@ Miroslav Rovis: Thank you, sir. I did not, at first, perceive that your comments were addressed to me, but assumed they followed up on some topic raised before I joined the list. But now that I have clicked your links, I think maybe they were. But I confess that I have not yet been able to understand. Are you saying I should change something in the source and recompile Dillo? If so, would you mind saying exactly what file and how I should change it? I don't care so much that the fonts be pretty, just legible without having to touch my nose to the monitor. On 8/29/15, dillo-dev-request at dillo.org <dillo-dev-request at dillo.org> wrote: > Send Dillo-dev mailing list submissions to > dillo-dev at dillo.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dillo-dev-request at dillo.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dillo-dev-owner at dillo.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: UI font size (Jorge Arellano Cid) > 2. Re: Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size > (Plmalternate Plmalternate) > 3. Re: Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > 4. Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration > (miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:10:25 -0300 > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] UI font size > Message-ID: <20150828151025.GB32592 at dillo.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: >> >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: >> >> > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >> > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. >> >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under >> "RENDERING SECTION"). > > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > # Minimum font size > font_min_size=18 > > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:50:10 -0400 > From: Plmalternate Plmalternate <plmalternate at gmail.com> > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font > size > Message-ID: > <CAB2o_TGdQ6MMqQPseBWUTvdo6KdxiV2ZieXR1Xv-jMu0N31Ybw at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> >> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: >> >>> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >>> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. >> >> I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under >> "RENDERING SECTION"). >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeremy Henty > > Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each > time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 > with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. > > I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but > when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on > the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. > > Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text > buttons/menus: > > 1st bar: > "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" > 2nd bar left: > "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". > 2nd bar right: > "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" > > For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is > SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't > change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, > but that's just me. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:16:25 +0200 > From: miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > To: dillo-dev at dillo.org > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies > Message-ID: <20150829021625.GA8318 at g0n> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr > wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: >> > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore >> renamed: >> www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] >> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 >> There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't >> reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. >> > > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on > x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 > > Note also the link there to the Forums topic: > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 > where also notice the video: > > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… > > in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely > wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX > attitude, in my opinion. > > BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or > is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can > be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, > they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). > > There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about > tonight, it's about: > Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html > (but separately if I manage) > > I did my best. Regards! > -- > Miroslav Rovis > Zagreb, Croatia > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr >

Aug. 30, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest,v19#12 UI font size

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

> From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> > There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: > > # Minimum font size > font_min_size=18 Thank you, sir. I have that set also. It affects only the text size of the content of the html document (e.g., a web page) for me. UI font is unaffected for me. Can anyone confirm that they have enlarged the font size SPEFICALLY of the UI? I'm not averse to recompiling but I don't know where to look in the source code.

Aug. 29, 2015

Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

I'm a little too tired and really sleepy, but I mention that I hope the Dillo developers will be able to tell me more on the issues that I thoroughly investigated, and posted a lot of captures and screencasts to document it. Please see, discarding what it unnecessary, the forum topic: Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html (esp. the post just posted an hour ago or so) and find it documented at: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/ I did my best. Regards! Good night! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Aug. 29, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > renamed: > www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't > reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. > I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9 Note also the link there to the Forums topic: A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130 where also notice the video: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Ge… in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX attitude, in my opinion. BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted, they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...). There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about tonight, it's about: Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html (but separately if I manage) I did my best. Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Aug. 29, 2015

Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> > Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > >> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > > I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > "RENDERING SECTION"). > > Regards, > > Jeremy Henty Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text buttons/menus: 1st bar: "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" 2nd bar left: "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". 2nd bar right: "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, but that's just me.

Aug. 29, 2015

UI font size

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > > > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > > I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > "RENDERING SECTION"). There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc: # Minimum font size font_min_size=18 -- Cheers Jorge.-

Aug. 28, 2015

UI font size

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big > enough for me to see, it would be perfect. I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under "RENDERING SECTION"). Regards, Jeremy Henty

Aug. 28, 2015

UI font size

by plmalternate＠gmail.com

Thanks for such a fast and small browser. If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big enough for me to see, it would be perfect. Point me toward a link maybe? If this is doable with either the dillorc or the style.css, including a directory with more than just one example of each in the installation, or alternately, on the website, might spare y'all getting emails like this. Also, you might consider one of the ad driven free forum sites, for mutual user support. Thanks for reading. -- I'm on the waiting list for an email account at protonmail.com where I'll be philip.mundhenk at protonmail.com or maybe philip.mundhenk at protonmail.ch until the DIME project gets off the ground. Because the Bill of Rights needs to be more than "a literary fiction".

Aug. 27, 2015

News about TLS support?

by arrowscript＠mail.com

Hi, any news about TLS support? I'm running Dillo in OpenBSD -current and TLS can't be used: ** ERROR **: dpi.c: can't start dpi daemon Yes, I checked dpi daemon and privileges. I compiled dillo in linux using the flag to enable TLS support, and even there I can't use TLS. Sincerely, Dillo is the best software for www browsing in my opinion, but I can't use them without TLS support [and Vi bindings]. Regards.

Aug. 26, 2015

javascript

by james.from.wellington＠gmail.com

src/table.hh might be a reasonable place to start thinking about the requirements for integrating a new set of tags. On 26/08/2015, bruce m beach <brucembeach at gmail.com> wrote: >>> But you haven't added the most important thing: does your site >>> works under dillo w/duktape? Because, y'know, that's more than >>> astounding to me! > > Well yes that would be pretty astounding since duk-tape most certainly > wouldn't do anything since it was just linked in to the dillo > executable. Dillo has to be modified to use it, maybe a lot of > work. My guess is that somewhere in Dillo is a state machine that > parses out keywords or tokens from the incoming stream and when > it has a complete token it branches to handle the token. When the > token 'script' is found then the following text is passed to the > parser in duktape. > > Bruce > > > On 8/25/15, Teodoro Santoni <asbrasbra at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 08:14:03PM -0700, bruce m beach wrote: >>> Hello everybody >>> >>> I completely happy with dillo just the way it is. I consider it >>> insane to go on the web with javascript enabled and apart from >>> gmail I don't normally have cookies enabled. (how can I >>> differentiate the two users? i.e I have dillo of user 1 on the >>> the screen and a dillo of user 2 also on the screen but the 2 >>> dillo's are identical in appearance). Anyway all of a sudden >>> after using dillo for a year or so I find there is a website that >>> I absolutely must get on but it requires javascript. Well okay I >>> search the web to try to find something, anything that has >>> javascript (I've been searching for day and night for about a >>> week now) and find that there are two things >>> >>> 1) Massive huge bloatware >>> 2) dillo >>> >>> Most things don't build, or don't have any kind of a build system >>> or are for x86 (I'm on arm) so I figure I have to bite the bullet >>> and build firefox. I've been rolling my own system for about 20 >>> years so so I know whats involved but after two config failures >>> and it failing on the gigantic final link after an 8 hour build, >>> I come to the conclusion that lifes not worth it. I don't want >>> that piece of junk on my computer anyway. Links2 at one time had >>> javascript but they abandoned it and elinks has javascript as >>> long as you have seamonkey installed (tarball>190Mbytes) >>> >>> Anybody got any ideas? >>> >>> I did find one thing. "duktape" (http://duktape.org/)which seems >>> to be an exceptionlly fine piece of code which is an embeddable >>> Ecmascript E5/E5.1 engine with a focus on portability and compact >>> footprint. All the examples compiled out of the box and linking >>> it to dillo (duktape.c duktape.h) took a few minutes to change >>> the makefile. The size's of the files are >>> >>> dillo 558,480 >>> dillo 767,456 with ducttape >>> >>> I don't know enough to be able to do anything with it (I work >>> with hardware) but thought someone might be interested as a route >>> to get javascript on dillo. >> >> Astounding. >> But you haven't added the most important thing: does your site works >> under >> dillo w/duktape? >> Because, y'know, that's more than astounding to me! >> >> -- >> Teodoro Santoni >> >> Something is wrong. I don't wanna compile 20 KB of Go code to list files. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

Aug. 26, 2015