- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Kelson Vibber

On Friday 25 July 2003 10:30 am, Mattias Östergren wrote: > When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in > the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. Feature or bug? That reminds me, I had a patch to add a title to the Bookmarks page - something I noticed because of this. (attached) -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

July 25, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Mattias Östergren

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:03:01 +0200 Frank de Lange <frank(a)unternet.org> wrote: > No known issues this time... > > Please... test this patch, and tell me what works/what does not/what you > want to see changed... The patch does not just give Dillo tab > functionality, it also provides a framework for implementing frames (no > pun intended) by separating 'document' from 'interface' code. So, the > sooner it is in CVS, the better... When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. Feature or bug? -- mattias östergren | /"\ compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign gävle, sweden | X No HTML in e-mail http://spikboll.net | / \

July 25, 2003

Re: Same bug again... (fwd)

by Jorge Arellano Cid

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:38:08 -0400 (CLT) From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> To: Sebastian Geerken <s.geerken(a)ping.de> Subject: Re: Same bug again... (this forwarded message doesn't include the original attachments) ---------------------------------------- Sebastian, > On Thu, Jul 24, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Sorry for knocking again on the same bug, but please > > acknowledge you've read my report on the mailing list. > > Yes, I received it (and also your other mail today). I'm quite under > stress at work due an x mio EUR (or whatever) project presentation :-( > > I cannot say when I'll have this bug fixed, I won't have much time at > the weekend, but hopefully in the next week. I understand. BTW, I gave a hand at trying to hunt the bug, and reduced the HTML page to reproduce it (attached), but it also requires a customized slow.c (also attached; it sends by bytes instead of chunks and allows changing the speed). A simple: ...slow?/tmp/b2.html will do. The bug has to do with the new way of handling NOWRAP. Adding more lines to the example table doesn't help, a window resize also doesn't help, but a back/forward fixes it. Hope this findings help. > > > I really don't want to upload the 0.8.0-pre tarball before > > 0.7.3 is out, and although a "first impression" is not accurate > > (agreed!), it helps to calm me down! :-) > > I don't know the state of 0.8.0-pre (I had no time to look at it at > all), but it may be an option to skip 0.7.3, depending on how much > time you estimate until 0.8.0 is mature for release. In this case, I > had some time to test and review the new (actually old, but never > used) code for incremental resizing. 0.8.0 may take a while before the final release; it is stable but we don't know what issues may spring. It also needs polishing before end users can play with it. One way to solve this problem is to tag current CVS as 0.7.3-rc1, and then upload the truckload of changes that 0.8.0-pre has. Then you can freely work on fixing the bug on 0.7.3-rc1, and when that's done we release 0.7.3 to the public. That way, I can finally let our developers play with 0.8.0-pre from CVS. You get out of the release pressure, and the only thing to be done after 0.7.3 is ready, is to forward port the fixes to CVS (currently 0.8.0-pre is up to date with 0.7.3 CVS). The other goodie that comes from making a 0.7.3 release is that as a long time has passed since our last release, not making this intermediate one would put a lot of pressure on 0.8.0's timeline. Sounds good for you? Best Jorge.-

July 25, 2003

RE: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Kelson Vibber

At 11:30 AM 7/24/2003, Sean Kelly wrote: >I'm glad that frames are not ousted and may be able >to spend some time doing some development on that front myself. Check out Frank's tab-support patches - as he says, "The patch does not just give Dillo tab functionality, it also provides a framework for implementing frames (no pun intended) by separating 'document' from 'interface' code." Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

July 24, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Andreas Schweitzer

Hi, > I have released version 6 of my tabs patch for Dillo. Head for the patch > website (geocities... start your junkbusters and privoxies...) and grab > it while it is fresh. Or go to http://www.hs.uni-hamburg.de/~stcd102/dillo-20030724-tabs.patch.gz Yesterdays version is there, too. Cheers, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

July 24, 2003

RE: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Sean Kelly

Oops! I had made a mental note of lack of support for frames both in the project README and on the sourceforge.net project home and somehow cross-connected those notes with some other comment about some obscure tag being obsolete. I'm glad that frames are not ousted and may be able to spend some time doing some development on that front myself. Sorry for the confusion! - Sean -----Original Message----- From: dillo-dev-admin(a)auriga.wearlab.de [mailto:dillo-dev-admin@auriga.wearlab.de] On Behalf Of Livio Baldini Soares Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:38 PM To: Sean Kelly Cc: dillo-dev(a)auriga.wearlab.de Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Frames Sean Kelly writes: > I don't recall where I read it, but I did see somewhere in the project > documentation that there is no intention of supporting frames now or > ever (did I misread?) - I recall the text citing that frames are > deprecated and will not be implemented. [... snip ...] Err... Where again did you see this written? Please point _exact_ source before making blatant assumptions or accusations. I've been following Dillo's development for more than 2 years now, and have never seen comments from any of the developers stating anything to the effect the frames are "deprecated" or not desired. Please make efforts in verifying facts before spreading unfounded information around... ok? regards, -- Livio B. Soares _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

July 24, 2003

[PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Frank de Lange

Hej! I have released version 6 of my tabs patch for Dillo. Head for the patch website (geocities... start your junkbusters and privoxies...) and grab it while it is fresh. The patch was made against 20030723 CVS. Notable improvements include: - the mystery of the disappearing full_screen_off_button is solved, it now stays put. Turns out the dw_gtk_scrolled_window does not show (or raise?) the button when needed. (Sebastian, can you confirm this?). Solved it by hiding, then showing the button explicitly. - worked around (what I consider to be) a bug in dw_gtk_scrolled_window which caused a Gdk-CRITICAL warning about a non-existing window (the widget should check if the window exists/has been mapped before it tries to set a cursor for it. Or am I wrong?). The workaround consists of an explicit gtk_widget_map() call on the docwin in commands.c:480 - backspace now goes back ONE step in history, as it should... No known issues this time... Please... test this patch, and tell me what works/what does not/what you want to see changed... The patch does not just give Dillo tab functionality, it also provides a framework for implementing frames (no pun intended) by separating 'document' from 'interface' code. So, the sooner it is in CVS, the better... As always, you can disable the tab functionality with --disable-tabs. You'll still gain the focus improvements and the shift-click functionality, as well as the document/interface separation. Download the patch here: http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/dillo-20030724-tabs.patch.gz size: 41688 bytes (gzipped, as downloaded) 170140 bytes (uncompressed) md5sum: 4bf94a322d2a406969819ebc56b3faf5 (gzipped, as downloaded) eee05fe3c95e86ed7fe6a01a25ade2f6 (uncompressed) As always, check the site for the most recent version: http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

July 24, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Kelson Vibber

On Wednesday 23 July 2003 7:25 pm, Sean Kelly wrote: > I recall the text citing that frames are > deprecated and will not be implemented. I don't recall hearing this from any of the major Dillo developers. You may be thinking of the discussions on how to populate the Link Toolbar (or Site Navigation Bar, depending on what week it is) for Mozilla. One of the controversies was about how to handle the situation in which two pages in a frameset have conflicting <link> tags. Someone made a similar remark in that discussion. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

July 24, 2003

RE: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Peter Milne

Sean Kelly said: > > I'm having a hard time understanding the reasoning behind a motion to > make frames a thing of the past so quickly, especially in the context of > a "lightweight" browser which has no animated graphics, Java applet or > JavaScript support, any one of which might be an adequate substitute for > the functionality which frames provides. It seems to me there are plenty > of applications for all of these features and that Dillo is mildly > handicapped to not support any of them. Actually, ummmm.....I really have no use for frames myself except for the fact Squirrelmail so happens to use them. I personally dont create frame sites nor can I remember the last time I saw one. Whether frames disappear from WC3's specs or not, I shall still sleep well. Thanks for pointing this out to me. -- ~~~Pete~~~ http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com

July 24, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Livio Baldini Soares

Sean Kelly writes: > I don't recall where I read it, but I did see somewhere in the project > documentation that there is no intention of supporting frames now or > ever (did I misread?) - I recall the text citing that frames are > deprecated and will not be implemented. [... snip ...] Err... Where again did you see this written? Please point _exact_ source before making blatant assumptions or accusations. I've been following Dillo's development for more than 2 years now, and have never seen comments from any of the developers stating anything to the effect the frames are "deprecated" or not desired. Please make efforts in verifying facts before spreading unfounded information around... ok? regards, -- Livio B. Soares

July 24, 2003