- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Weirdly scaled images (again)

by fusionfile＠gmail.com

On 2015-08-19 23:40, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:58:51PM +0200, August Karlstrom wrote: >> On 2015-08-19 17:32, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >>> as it was mentioned in this thread already the image scaling issue >>> is fixed for quite some time in the main line of the dillo repo. >> >> I have downloaded and installed the latest Dillo version 3.1-dev. With >> the test file below the two images have the same size despite setting >> width to 25 percent on the second image. Do you get the same result? > > yes, I get the same result. Interestingly it works ok without the > enclosing <div> If anyone running Dillo 3.0.4 is interested I have made a patch which fixes the image scaling issue (see attachment). With the test document below, the Dillo logo should keep its aspect ratio when the Dillo browser window is resized. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Test</title> </head> <body> <div><img src="http://www.dillo.org/db1.png" alt="Dillo logo" width="50%" /></div> </body> </html> -- August

Sept. 18, 2015

Font blacklist

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Di, Sep 15, 2015, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:55:30PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > > installed, which make reading texts tedious. A possible workaround is > > attached: a blacklist for fonts (not yet committed). What do you > > think? > > couldn't one get a similar effect with fontconfig using <rejectfont>? > See > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.html Yes, thanks for the hint. With this info, I withdraw my patch. Perhaps this could be added to the dillo help page. Sebastian

Sept. 16, 2015

Font blacklist

by fusionfile＠gmail.com

On 2015-09-15 21:34, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Helvetica, e. g., which looks rather pixelated, as compared to other > nicely rendered fonts. I'm not sure where this comes from, "apt > dist-uprade" took several hours. I don't have Helvetica. However, I have installed ttf-mscorefonts-installer and if the CSS says font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif Iceweasel seems to chooses Arial (from mscorefonts) whereas Dillo chooses the default DejaVu sans-serif font. -- August

Sept. 16, 2015

Font blacklist

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Di, Sep 15, 2015, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:34:20PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote > > On Di, Sep 15, 2015, August Karlstrom wrote: > > > On 2015-09-15 20:55, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > >After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > > > >installed, which make reading texts tedious. > > > > > > I run Debian Jessie too and I haven't noticed any ugly fonts. Can you > > > provide an example? > > > > Helvetica, e. g., which looks rather pixelated, as compared to other > > nicely rendered fonts. I'm not sure where this comes from, "apt > > dist-uprade" took several hours. > > > > (BTW, I'm also using libfltk1.3-dev from Debian, without any further > > configuration.) > > Is Debian's libfltk1.3-dev built with the xft option enabled? If not, > then ugly fonts are to be expected. See... > http://www.dillo.org/screenshots/disable_antialiasing.png Not looked at it in detail, but since most fonts render nicely, I assume that the Debian package is indeed build with Xft support. Sebastian

Sept. 16, 2015

Font blacklist

by waltdnes＠waltdnes.org

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:34:20PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote > On Di, Sep 15, 2015, August Karlstrom wrote: > > On 2015-09-15 20:55, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > >After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > > >installed, which make reading texts tedious. > > > > I run Debian Jessie too and I haven't noticed any ugly fonts. Can you > > provide an example? > > Helvetica, e. g., which looks rather pixelated, as compared to other > nicely rendered fonts. I'm not sure where this comes from, "apt > dist-uprade" took several hours. > > (BTW, I'm also using libfltk1.3-dev from Debian, without any further > configuration.) Is Debian's libfltk1.3-dev built with the xft option enabled? If not, then ugly fonts are to be expected. See... http://www.dillo.org/screenshots/disable_antialiasing.png Is there a way to do a custom build of Debian's libfltk1.3-dev? -- Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org>

Sept. 15, 2015

Font blacklist

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:55:30PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Hi! > > After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > installed, which make reading texts tedious. A possible workaround is > attached: a blacklist for fonts (not yet committed). What do you > think? couldn't one get a similar effect with fontconfig using <rejectfont>? See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.html Johannes > > Sebastian > > PS: strcasecmp may not be portable. > > diff -r ea3ff2a0a636 dillorc > --- a/dillorc Wed Jul 08 18:43:25 2015 +0000 > +++ b/dillorc Tue Sep 15 20:48:19 2015 +0200 > @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ > # Minimum font size in pixels > #font_min_size=6 > > +# Define fonts dillo should not use at all, typically because their quality is > +# that bad that you prefer alternatives. You can specify multiple fonts. > +#font_blacklist=uglyfont > +#font_blacklist=unattractivefont > +#font_blacklist=awkwardfont > + > # Show tooltip popups for HTML title attributes > #show_tooltip=YES > > diff -r ea3ff2a0a636 src/prefs.c > --- a/src/prefs.c Wed Jul 08 18:43:25 2015 +0000 > +++ b/src/prefs.c Tue Sep 15 20:48:19 2015 +0200 > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ > prefs.font_monospace = dStrdup(PREFS_FONT_MONOSPACE); > prefs.font_sans_serif = dStrdup(PREFS_FONT_SANS_SERIF); > prefs.font_serif = dStrdup(PREFS_FONT_SERIF); > + prefs.font_blacklist = dList_new(16); > prefs.fullwindow_start = FALSE; > > /* these four constitute the geometry */ > @@ -138,6 +139,7 @@ > dFree(prefs.font_monospace); > dFree(prefs.font_sans_serif); > dFree(prefs.font_serif); > + dList_free(prefs.font_blacklist); > a_Url_free(prefs.home); > dFree(prefs.http_language); > a_Url_free(prefs.http_proxy); > diff -r ea3ff2a0a636 src/prefs.h > --- a/src/prefs.h Wed Jul 08 18:43:25 2015 +0000 > +++ b/src/prefs.h Tue Sep 15 20:48:19 2015 +0200 > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ > char *font_cursive; > char *font_fantasy; > char *font_monospace; > + Dlist *font_blacklist; > bool_t enterpress_forces_submit; > bool_t middle_click_opens_new_tab; > bool_t right_click_closes_tab; > diff -r ea3ff2a0a636 src/prefsparser.cc > --- a/src/prefsparser.cc Wed Jul 08 18:43:25 2015 +0000 > +++ b/src/prefsparser.cc Tue Sep 15 20:48:19 2015 +0200 > @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ > { "font_monospace", &prefs.font_monospace, PREFS_STRING, 0 }, > { "font_sans_serif", &prefs.font_sans_serif, PREFS_STRING, 0 }, > { "font_serif", &prefs.font_serif, PREFS_STRING, 0 }, > + { "font_blacklist", &prefs.font_blacklist, PREFS_STRINGS, 0 }, > { "fullwindow_start", &prefs.fullwindow_start, PREFS_BOOL, 0 }, > { "geometry", NULL, PREFS_GEOMETRY, 0 }, > { "home", &prefs.home, PREFS_URL, 0 }, > diff -r ea3ff2a0a636 src/styleengine.cc > --- a/src/styleengine.cc Wed Jul 08 18:43:25 2015 +0000 > +++ b/src/styleengine.cc Tue Sep 15 20:48:19 2015 +0200 > @@ -391,7 +391,10 @@ > fontName = prefs.font_fantasy; > else if (dStrAsciiCasecmp (p->value.strVal, "monospace") == 0) > fontName = prefs.font_monospace; > - else if (Font::exists(layout, p->value.strVal)) > + else if (Font::exists(layout, p->value.strVal) && > + !dList_find_custom(prefs.font_blacklist, > + p->value.strVal, > + (dCompareFunc) strcasecmp)) > fontName = p->value.strVal; > > if (fontName) { // font found > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

Sept. 15, 2015

Font blacklist

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Di, Sep 15, 2015, August Karlstrom wrote: > On 2015-09-15 20:55, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > >After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > >installed, which make reading texts tedious. > > I run Debian Jessie too and I haven't noticed any ugly fonts. Can you > provide an example? Helvetica, e. g., which looks rather pixelated, as compared to other nicely rendered fonts. I'm not sure where this comes from, "apt dist-uprade" took several hours. (BTW, I'm also using libfltk1.3-dev from Debian, without any further configuration.) Sebastian

Sept. 15, 2015

Font blacklist

by fusionfile＠gmail.com

On 2015-09-15 20:55, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > installed, which make reading texts tedious. I run Debian Jessie too and I haven't noticed any ugly fonts. Can you provide an example? -- August

Sept. 15, 2015

Font blacklist

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

Hi! After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got installed, which make reading texts tedious. A possible workaround is attached: a blacklist for fonts (not yet committed). What do you think? Sebastian PS: strcasecmp may not be portable.

Sept. 15, 2015

Setting the filename of a PDF response

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:29:31AM +0200, August Karlstrom wrote: > I'm working on a web page with a form which generates a PDF document in > memory and returns it to the user. In the response header I have set > > Content-Type: application/pdf > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="foo.pdf" > > However, Dillo seems to ignore the specified filename and instead uses the > URL base name plus query string as the default filename in the download > dialog window. Any suggestions? Currently, there's no parsing for this HTTP directive in dillo. If you're a C programmer it shouldn't be hard to make a patch for it. (hints: in cache.c, the http header is stored in CacheEntry_t->Header. there's also a Cache_parse_field() function) HTH. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 15, 2015