- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by landy

> Here's what I do: > > jojo@jojo ~/dillo-0.7.3 $ patch < dillo-0.7.3-tabs.patch try patch -p1

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by johannes leimbach

Hi ! I'd love to give this patch a try, but unfortunatelity I can't patch the sourcecode. Here's what I do: jojo@jojo ~/dillo-0.7.3 $ patch < dillo-0.7.3-tabs.patch patching file ChangeLog patching file Makefile.in patching file aclocal.m4 patching file autogen.sh patching file configure patching file configure.in patching file dillorc patching file Browser_Frames.txt patching file Browser_Tabs.txt patching file DilloDoc.txt patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] (press enter) Apply anyway? [n] y Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 13. Hunk #3 FAILED at 122. Hunk #4 FAILED at 212. Hunk #5 FAILED at 220. 5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej patching file README Hunk #1 FAILED at 18. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file README.rej patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] [goes on...] Well, don't know why this is. I'd love to hear answer from you how to resolve this :) Thanks a lot for your help! Cu

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Mike Eriksen

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ralph Slooten wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) > Mike Eriksen <kme3(a)mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote: > > > ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> > > try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo` > > RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your > filesize dramatically. > > Greetings > Ralph > -- > http://axljab.homelinux.org/ > "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux" Aha! Learned something new... Now it is 333K :-) Thanks a lot. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Ralph Slooten

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) Mike Eriksen <kme3(a)mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote: > ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo` RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your filesize dramatically. Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"

Oct. 3, 2003

tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Mike Eriksen

Hi I've been running Dillo 0.7.3 from a rpm on a Redhat 9.0 for a while, but wanted to try out the tab/frame patch. So I downloaded the Dillo tarball, applied the patch, ran configure, make and make install. No problem. Since the tarball suggest /usr/local/bin and the rpm-version /usr/bin I'm able to have both versions simultaneously. However: *** ls -lh /usr/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 297K <blah blah> ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> *** A twelve fold increase in size!!!!? Obviously I did something stupid, but what? Gcc is 3.2.2. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by landy

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:41, Frank de Lange wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:05:48PM -0400, landy wrote: > > well i admit that either i am blind or can't look correctly but in cvs i > > do not see any patches. > > > > i was told there several patches out there for dillo great thanks

Sept. 30, 2003

Fix for dillo: Save cookies in forums

by johannes leimbach

Hi! I got a patch/bugfix for dillo 0.7.3 Problem: When visiting PHPBB boards such as www.c-plusplus.de/forum/ or other messageboards in general (www.buahaboard.net) dillo does not save the cookies. They are only stored in memory, so after a restart you have to login again (which rendered dillo basically useless for me) Problem cause: After looking at the cookies these boards wanted to place I realized their date was somehow 2 hours back in time, so they were already expired for dillo. Well, the webmasters are to blame again. The cookies were discarded in cookies.c, Cookies_create_timestamp, line 388following it just returned 0, indicating the timestamp is invalid, thus discarding the cookie. Making it return a valid time (eh, not that valid anyway) solves this problem: cookies.c, line 388 else { //~ DEBUG_MSG(5, E_msg); // WAS: LINE 388 //~ return (time_t) 0; // WAS : LINE 389 // i do not pretend to understand this, but hey, it works year = -2069; month=-1; hour=minutes=seconds=-1; day=1; day += (year - 1968) * 1461 / 4; day += ((((month * 153) + 2) / 5) - 672); ret = (time_t)((day * 60 * 60 * 24) + (hour * 60 * 60) + (minutes * 60) + seconds); return ret; } Sorry for not knowing about the linux time stamp, but i just had no interest to learn that stuff yet. If someone wants to explain it, go on! And of course I would've also provided a nice .patch file, if i just knew how. This is the first time I submit a patch :) So, please let me know what you think of this fix, i'd love to see it in the next version of dillo. I guess I'm not the only one with that problem :) Sincerly, johannes

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Yes or No: optional compilation of 'extra' features

by Sebastian Geerken

On Thu, Sep 25, Frank de Lange wrote: > It was in reaction to comments from Sebastian that I posed this > question to the list. He suggested removing the conditional compile, > but I want to know what the list has to say on this. As a quick look > at the list archives will show, not everyone likes these new > additions to Dillo. Its not a matter of liking or not, users may simply ignore tabs (and there may perhaps be a _user_ option for alternative presentations of frames). However, conditional compilation makes maintaining more difficult (and since that's the task of Jorge and me, the list is the wrong place to ask), so it is a question whether the reduced binary size outweighs the increased maintaining problems. > I have already removed some preferences which could be combined > (frame_blank_in_tab and tab_on_middle_click -> > tab_instead_of_window) or which should be defaulted to the new > functionality (document_title_use_url). Other suggestions Sebastian > made are: > > - Remove tab title compression/shortening (I might create a new label widget > which compresses/shortens text to a given size for this functionality) > - exchange tab_load_in_background with a UI element/choice (I think this > should be delayed until Dillo has a preference UI/plugin to avoid > unnecessary complexity and one-off solutions) What I meant is that the link menu should have to entries, "Open link in new tab", and "Open link in new background tab" (or so). Options should reflect different user's taste, while this difference depends on the situation. > - rename "DilloDoc" to something else (I do not agree, DilloDoc is > descriptive and short) In a local, experimental version of dillo, I've added a new module, representing the document in a DOM-like way, and which was this morning renamed from "doc.[ch]" to "doctree.[ch]". Your DilloDoc represents mainly the interface part of the document, there are other aspects. Sebastian

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Paul Pelzl

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:01AM -0400, landy wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:23, Kelson Vibber wrote: > > On Monday 29 September 2003 5:25 pm, landy wrote: > > > thanks a million, > > > > > > i ma having problems with the tab patch, how do i apply it? > > > > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel/1108 > > when i follow those instructions i get this > > > > illustre@pepino:~/dillo-0.7.3/src> patch -p1 < > ~/dillo-20030926-tabs.patch I think you have two problems: 1) You need the patch for Dillo 0.7.3; based on the filename I think you have the patch for Dillo CVS. Look here: http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/dillo-0.7.3-20030926-tabs.patch.gz 2) Try applying the patch from within the dillo-0.7.3/ directory, *not* from the dillo-0.7.3/src/ subdirectory. Paul

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Johann Koenig

On Tuesday September 30 at 07:24am landy <landy(a)despiertapr.com> wrote: > illustre@pepino:~/dillo-0.7.3/src> patch -p1 < > ~/dillo-20030926-tabs.patch It looks like you are using the CVS patch, when you need the .7.3 release patch -- -johann koenig Now Playing: Mustard Plug - Just A Minute : Still Standing (Disc 4) Today is Pungenday, the 54th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3169 My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/johannkoenig.pgp

Sept. 30, 2003