- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[Dillo-dev]Caching

by Russell J. Wood

Hi all, Before the next release would it be possible to add an option in dillrc concerning caching (i.e. don't do it)? Regards, Russell

Oct. 4, 2004

[Dillo-dev]Interface improvements and others.

by rootag＠terra.es

(Sorry for my English, any corrections are wellcome). Hello, I hope not bother with my opinions. In the Dillo interface, I think that is good idea a simple speedometer for medium speed. medium_speed = Total_html_size_in_KBytes / Total_time_to_load. This isn't the real speed of line, but is the real speed for load html document. I think that is very easy to make. Can be displayed together the images loaded, and KB loaded. Another question, why Dillo render, and render again and again,when load are in process? This burn a lot of CPU. Explorer and other seems to render at a time. Another more, It's posible make a dialog box that answer the human if want accept cookies from site, this time, always from this site,never from this site,no for this time? Thanks, Fran.

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Matthias Franz

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote: > see the http://fr.wikipedia.org web page for exemple. This page is encoded in UTF-8. See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html for more on UTF-8. It would certainly be nice if Dillo accepted UTF-8 encoding of ISO-8859-1, but at present this is not the case. All the best, -- Matthias Franz Section de Mathématiques, Université de Genève, Suisse

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Matthias Franz

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote: > see the http://fr.wikipedia.org web page for exemple. This page is encoded in UTF-8. See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html for more on UTF-8. It would certainly be nice if Dillo accepted UTF-8 encoding of ISO-8859-1, but at present this is not the case. All the best, -- Matthias Franz Section de Mathématiques, Université de Genève, Suisse

Oct. 2, 2004

[Dillo-dev]mailto: protocol

by Florent BERANGER

Hi, I didn't see, in docs and config file, how to configure the mailto: protocol in order to redirect it to a mail client specified in dillorc config dile. Does I need a patch for this feature ? Thanks for your infos, Best regards, Florent ************************ ADSL ILLIMITE TISCALI + TELEPHONE GRATUIT ************************ Surfez 40 fois plus vite pour 30EUR/mois seulement ! Et téléphonez partout en France gratuitement, vers les postes fixes (hors numéros spéciaux). Tarifs très avantageux vers les mobiles et l'international ! Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl (voir conditions sur le site)

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Matthias Franz

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote: > see the http://fr.wikipedia.org web page for exemple. This page is encoded in UTF-8. See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html for more on UTF-8. It would certainly be nice if Dillo accepted UTF-8 encoding of ISO-8859-1, but at present this is not the case. All the best, -- Matthias Franz Section de Mathématiques, Université de Genève, Suisse

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Florent BERANGER

Hi, see the http://fr.wikipedia.org web page for exemple. Best regards, Florent ---------- Initial Header ----------- From : dillo-dev-admin(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de To : dillo-dev(a)auriga.wearlab.de Cc : Date : Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:03:46 -0400 Subject : Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test > > What's bad about that code? HTML 4 is, in the absence of headers or > > meta tags indicating otherwise, assumed to be ISO-8859-1. The é is > > perfectly legal there. > > If you give Dillo an ISO-8859-1 'é', it will work fine. > > Now, if you give it in some other encoding, it will fail. > > > > > Given that they show up correctly when I look at that site here, I > > suspect it's a font problem on the display, not an HTML or Dillo problem. > > Yes, it could be. BTW, if the source page has an ISO-8859-1 'é' > this is surely the problem. Sorry, I should have said: "if the source page has a NON ISO-8859-1 'é', this is surely the problem" -- Cheers Jorge.- _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev ************************ ADSL ILLIMITE TISCALI + TELEPHONE GRATUIT ************************ Surfez 40 fois plus vite pour 30EUR/mois seulement ! Et téléphonez partout en France gratuitement, vers les postes fixes (hors numéros spéciaux). Tarifs très avantageux vers les mobiles et l'international ! Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl (voir conditions sur le site)

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Jorge Arellano Cid

> > What's bad about that code? HTML 4 is, in the absence of headers or > > meta tags indicating otherwise, assumed to be ISO-8859-1. The é is > > perfectly legal there. > > If you give Dillo an ISO-8859-1 'é', it will work fine. > > Now, if you give it in some other encoding, it will fail. > > > > > Given that they show up correctly when I look at that site here, I > > suspect it's a font problem on the display, not an HTML or Dillo problem. > > Yes, it could be. BTW, if the source page has an ISO-8859-1 'é' > this is surely the problem. Sorry, I should have said: "if the source page has a NON ISO-8859-1 'é', this is surely the problem" -- Cheers Jorge.-

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 07:33:32PM +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote: > Hi, Hi. > > I'm Florent BERANGER, from Flonix company > (http://www.flonix.com) > > We like Dillo because it's small and fast :) > I've just tested the 0.8.3rc1, the rendering is really better :) Good you like it. ;) > > Here 2 remaining bugs I've found : > - some hardcoded accented characters (for exemple use "é" in > the place of "é" in HTML code) aren't properly displayed. > - the pages background must be white by default (actually grey). (Answered in a previous email) > We currently working to port the "crystal" icon set to Dillo. > Since done, you'll can add it in icons page :) OK. > We are very interested by Tabs support feature. > I saw some patchs for this feature. How can we compile Dillo > 0.8.3 with them ? A good way to get TABS is to have a window manager that does it. I'm using fluxbox since a long time and TABS work great here for me. Even better than with native support because fluxbox allows me to set the tab labels on the information bar at the top of the window, allowing me to maximize the viewable space. Notwithstanding that I believe the WM to be the right place to implement TABS, maybe in the future we'll have to add some native support for them. Unless the most popular WMs or freedesktop project promote them as a standard, users will lack of TABS in Dillo and asking them to change the WM is too much. Now, once again, with limited manpower all these tasks become a procrastinated forever in the priority list. :( > > Thanks for your good works, Did you plan at some point to include Dillo in Flonix? -- Cheers Jorge.-

Oct. 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]0.8.3rc1 test

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:28:07PM -0700, Kelson Vibber wrote: > higuita wrote: > >On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:33:32 +0200, "Florent BERANGER" > ><cosmic.flo(a)libertysurf.fr> wrote: > >>Here 2 remaining bugs I've found : > >>- some hardcoded accented characters (for exemple use "é" in > >>the place of "é" in HTML code) aren't properly displayed. > >> > > i think that its the dev team stand point to not support bad > > html, as this breaks even more the standard and makes the > > browsers bigger without reason... > > What's bad about that code? HTML 4 is, in the absence of headers or > meta tags indicating otherwise, assumed to be ISO-8859-1. The é is > perfectly legal there. If you give Dillo an ISO-8859-1 'é', it will work fine. Now, if you give it in some other encoding, it will fail. > > Given that they show up correctly when I look at that site here, I > suspect it's a font problem on the display, not an HTML or Dillo problem. Yes, it could be. BTW, if the source page has an ISO-8859-1 'é' this is surely the problem. > As for the default background: that's up to the browser, not the spec. A > basic web design rule going back to 1996 is: never assume what the > default colors are going to be -- if you want something specific, set it > in your code. Unfortunately, Dillo doesn't support CSS yet, which means > you have to resort to setting these in the <body> tag. The background color can be defined in dillorc (either the global one, or on a per user basis). HTH. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Oct. 1, 2004