- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Liam J. Foy

Hello Guys, First of all, congratulations on the excellent work achieved on dillo. Sadly I was only introduced to dillo recently, however I now use it every day for about 1-2 hours browsing CVSWEB. I love the way bookmarks are handled! On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot view is: www.netbsd.org/ The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these websites using other means =/ Hope someone can shead some light on to my problem. If anymore information is needed, please ask! Regards, -- - Liam J. Foy DragonFly BSD Committer <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Jeremy Henty

Liam J. Foy wrote: > ... A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I > cannot view is: www.netbsd.org/ I have no problems viewing http://www.netbsd.org/ with a stock dillo-0.8.4 [1] . Either something has happened between dillo-0.8.4 and the CVS tag you're tracking or the problem isn't just with dillo. Cheers, Jeremy Henty [1] Albeit patched to recognise the "'" entity, but that surely won't affect routing, will it?

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Patrick Shanahan

* Liam J. Foy <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> [03-30-05 18:48]: > On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I > dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am > currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is > strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot > view is: www.netbsd.org/ > > The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following > the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these > websites using other means =/ You have problems with your system. I have forwarded to you directly a screen capture of the site accessed with dillo .... -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by Jeremy Henty

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:51:05PM +0200, meka wrote: > ... 1.2.x version [of FLTK] which is not supported any more by the > fltk team (if I understood well). Pardon me, but I *think* you misunderstand. The FLTK web site <URL:http://www.fltk.org/> lists version 1.1.6 as the *stable* version. Both 1.2.x and 2.0.x appear to be works in progress. Cheers, Jeremy Henty

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by meka

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:17:54 -0800 Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > > -- > Kelson Vibber > www.hyperborea.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev BTW, how is this plan going? I mean, I like fltk, but on the site says (or said, I haven't seen it recently) that it will use 1.2.x version which is not supported any more by the fltk team (if I understood well). Which version is is is going to be used? I vote for 2.0 (Unicode by default is there). -- I haven't even got up and the bug is here :o)

March 30, 2005

[Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by R. Tyler Ballance

oops, forgot to reply to the list :-! -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: R. Tyler Ballance <tyler(a)tamu.edu> To: Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:16:56 -0600 On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:17 -0800, Kelson Vibber wrote: > R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > > Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 > > libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? > > People have done tests, and Dillo becomes much slower and much larger > under GTK2. > > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > That's fine, but where (if any) is the code in CVS, i've worked with FLTK before, but only from a C++ perspective...is Dillo staying in C? By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) Have you given thought to wxWidgets, or anything other graphics libs? (FLTK was kinda ugly the last time I used it, then again, GTK+ 1.2 isn't much pretty either) -R. Tyler Ballance

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by Kelson Vibber

R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 > libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? People have done tests, and Dillo becomes much slower and much larger under GTK2. The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more current code base. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

March 30, 2005

[Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by R. Tyler Ballance

Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? I'm not sure what it would break to build against the 2.0 libs, but I would really like to start building against them so I can add the clipboard code that i've had my eye on ;) I don't think the size would grow _that_ much, and I think the benefits would be large from using 2.0. Right now, the only difference I can see would be in the autoconf files, GTK+ 2.0 uses pkg-config to supply the correct cflags and ldflags, while GTK+ 1.2 uses gtk-config. Ideas, suggestions? -R. Tyler Ballance p.s. I'm working through bug #668 which I added last night on my NetBSD laptop right now, woo

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Brian Hechinger

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > For this reason I decide to have -r option instead put an option in a > config file because packager could deliver its own default config with > that option activated by default. It could be much more difficult for > the packager to force me using that option by command line, instead. > ;-) this is why my plan was to have an rc file similar to the cookierc file so you can have fine grained control over which sites are allowed to meta-refresh and which ones aren't. IMNSHO, the best solution. ;) -brian -- "Now you know why I got the everliving hell OUT of Windows administration. Knowing it doesn't make it any easier. It's just broken-as-designed."

March 16, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Patch: config option for page increment

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:41:31PM +0100, Alexander Becher wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi! > I have made a small change to dillo-0.8.4, so I can put a line like > > scroll_factor=0.5 > > in my dillorc and get the old behaviour for scrolling a page. > > It would be great if this could be included in the dillo distribution, > so I don't have to patch my source every time I build a new version. > > I know that the current effort is the port to FLTK. If this makes this > patch useless for new versions, I'll try to adapt it once the port to > FLTK is done. Don't worry, most probably there will not be a 0.8.5. Just be sure that once the protoype is available (with scrolling ;) you submit a patch for it. -- Cheers Jorge.-

March 14, 2005