- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

include guard naming

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:09:53PM -0400, corvid(a)lavabit.com wrote: > I was just going through and changing the include guards > that don't follow the dillo convention, and then > I glanced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard > and it reminds me that the C++ standard prohibits '_'s > at the beginning. > > Does anyone care enough to have an opinion? > If we want to rm the leading or surrounding underscores, > I might as well do that too before committing. A "D_" prefix looks OK to me. e.g. #ifndef D_BINARYCONST_H #define D_BINARYCONST_H ... #endif /* D_BINARYCONST_H */ -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 27, 2009

patch: Re: [Dillo-dev] https through a proxy

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Here you go. As I said, I have not had the opportunity to test this under a wide range of conditions.

May 27, 2009

--xid option

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:24:14PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:34:56PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:14:14PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:48:43PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > attached patch tries to implement the missing --xid option that is > > > > > used to embed dillo into the claws mailer. > > > > > The right way to do this would probabely be to implement the > > > > > complete XEMBED protocol which is also mentioned in > > > > > doc/fltk-problems.doc. > > > > > However a simple XReparentWindow() seems to work more or less here. > > > > > Please test. > > > > > > > > It seems like you forgot to commit xembed.{hh,cc} to the repo. > > > > e.g. hg add xembed.hh xembed.cc > > > > > > Oh yes. Should be fixed now. > > > Btw. I managed to install the claws mail client including the dillo > > > plugin and it seems to work fine now with dillo2. That's why I just > > > committed the xembed stuff. > > > > This is very good. > > > > I'll have to dig for the sylpheed contact to let them know. > > Does anybody here know the email? > > I already contacted them on irc (#claws on freenode). > It would be good if this get's some testing as there seems to be > some interaction with the WM in use. I now tested it successful > on dwm, twm, and fvwm. > Also there are probabely more elegant ways to do it, but > for now I think it's better than nothing. More testing showed that the current implementation has severe problems. The thing is that the window manager that I use (dwm) is one of the few non-reparenting WMs. Most others reparent new windows and that can create races with the reparentin we do. There also seems to be a problem with keyboard events in that case. Is there anyone on the list with in-depth X11 knowledge who could help with the xembed stuff? Cheers, Johannes > > Cheers, > Johannes

May 26, 2009

https through a proxy

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I wrote: > Yesterday I hacked up (it's still very hacky right now) > some code that is intended to make https work through > a proxy, but I haven't tested it on an actual proxy yet. > > Do you have any suggestions on what would be > the most convenient way to go about this? > (It'd be nicer just to test with something > that's running out there than to do a bunch > of building and configuring for something I'll > just rm again afterward.) I built privoxy, which went smoothly, and found that my code is working.

May 26, 2009

https through a proxy

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Yesterday I hacked up (it's still very hacky right now) some code that is intended to make https work through a proxy, but I haven't tested it on an actual proxy yet. Do you have any suggestions on what would be the most convenient way to go about this? (It'd be nicer just to test with something that's running out there than to do a bunch of building and configuring for something I'll just rm again afterward.)

May 25, 2009

include guard naming

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:09:53PM -0400, corvid(a)lavabit.com wrote: > I was just going through and changing the include guards > that don't follow the dillo convention, and then > I glanced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard > and it reminds me that the C++ standard prohibits '_'s > at the beginning. > > Does anyone care enough to have an opinion? > If we want to rm the leading or surrounding underscores, > I might as well do that too before committing. +1 for removing the undescores

May 24, 2009

Spotted a tiny dillo bug with tabs

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:16:11PM -0700, Freya wrote: > > > Tiny bug: When dillo changes tabs it doesn't update the main window header thing. Also the same if you close a tab. This can lead to weird effects such as the top header thing having info about a webpage that you don't have open at all. That was fixed recently by Jorge. At least here it works fine now. Please make sure you are running the latest version from: http://hg.dillo.org/dillo Please report back if you are still seeing issues with that version. Cheers, Johannes

May 24, 2009

Spotted a tiny dillo bug with tabs

by freya128＠yahoo.com

Tiny bug: When dillo changes tabs it doesn't update the main window header thing. Also the same if you close a tab. This can lead to weird effects such as the top header thing having info about a webpage that you don't have open at all. Hope that helps! :) love Freya

May 24, 2009

include guard naming

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I was just going through and changing the include guards that don't follow the dillo convention, and then I glanced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard and it reminds me that the C++ standard prohibits '_'s at the beginning. Does anyone care enough to have an opinion? If we want to rm the leading or surrounding underscores, I might as well do that too before committing. [pop/smtp isn't working at the moment, so I'm sending this through webmail. Let's hope they doesn't mangle line wrapping or anything.]

May 24, 2009

[bug]: uint32_t not declared

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 02:06:07PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Does tip work for you now? Yes. Thanks! Jeremy Henty

May 24, 2009