- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, We're approaching quickly to the release of dillo-2.1 ! :) The idea is to make the official announcement this Thursday 18 (June) I've uploaded the source tarball: http://www.dillo.org/download/ We need the main .deb and .rpm before Thursday (e.g. Ubuntu & Debian current, same for the most used Fedora). Would you mind Andreas, Kelson? Any comments, confirmation of OK-ness, tests or last minute touches, this is the moment. TIA. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 16, 2009

Limiting number connections made to server

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:15:00AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Dennis wrote: > > Currently, I don't think dillo places any kind of regulation on the > > number of connections it tries to make with an http server, and this > > causes bad things to happen with some -- ie. if it tries to open a page > > with hundreds of thumbnails, it can crash some http servers. Is there a > > way to limit the number of connections made? > > I really wish there were. > Dillo should be a good citizen. Currently Dillo doesn't have a way to limit the number of connections. I assume that apache has a way on the server side and that more or less has made of it a smaller problem. What http server are you using? This will probably get into the feature request queue for dillo-2.2. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 16, 2009

Limiting number connections made to server

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Dennis wrote: > Currently, I don't think dillo places any kind of regulation on the > number of connections it tries to make with an http server, and this > causes bad things to happen with some -- ie. if it tries to open a page > with hundreds of thumbnails, it can crash some http servers. Is there a > way to limit the number of connections made? I really wish there were. Dillo should be a good citizen. (Well, there's always the 'solution' of turning off automatic image loading :)

June 16, 2009

Limiting number connections made to server

by dennisn＠dennisn.dyndns.org

Currently, I don't think dillo places any kind of regulation on the number of connections it tries to make with an http server, and this causes bad things to happen with some -- ie. if it tries to open a page with hundreds of thumbnails, it can crash some http servers. Is there a way to limit the number of connections made?

June 15, 2009

release candidate 1

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > A splash page was committed. Please comment or send > suggestions/patches/ideas/kudos :) Edited slightly.

June 15, 2009

release candidate 1

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:02:27PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Johannes, Corvid, > > I'll be out of town this weekend, please attend any > problem on the repo. as it's rc1. The idea is to make > a release next week. > > On the pending things that you may like to advance: > - write the dillo-2.1 about:splash page A splash page was committed. Please comment or send suggestions/patches/ideas/kudos :) We're almost there... -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 15, 2009

release candidate 1

by jcid＠dillo.org

Johannes, Corvid, I'll be out of town this weekend, please attend any problem on the repo. as it's rc1. The idea is to make a release next week. On the pending things that you may like to advance: - write the dillo-2.1 about:splash page - check making packages - polish FAQ and help text -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 13, 2009

memory use

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:54:52PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > > > I don't think I noticed that earlier. > > > > Oh, I didn't notice too. > > Is this result reproducible in your computer? > > I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php > which is easier to deal with. > > dillo > 8812 4668 -g, no optimization > 10940 5852 opening page > 14844 9732 retrieving images > > I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, > libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten. > > firefox 2.0.0.20 > 54280 21952 to start > 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) > 55996 25120 with images > 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything. > > firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box > for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight > 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) > 50804 23716 to show page > 51764 24812 pref dialog up > 49816 25052 with images > 47768 25048 after waiting a while > afaik firefox stores pixmaps on the server side, so you probabely need to keep an eye on Xorg memory usage too. Cheers, Johannes

June 13, 2009

memory use

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > > I don't think I noticed that earlier. > > Oh, I didn't notice too. > Is this result reproducible in your computer? I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php which is easier to deal with. dillo 8812 4668 -g, no optimization 10940 5852 opening page 14844 9732 retrieving images I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten. firefox 2.0.0.20 54280 21952 to start 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) 55996 25120 with images 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything. firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) 50804 23716 to show page 51764 24812 pref dialog up 49816 25052 with images 47768 25048 after waiting a while

June 13, 2009

memory use

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > I don't think I noticed that earlier. Oh, I didn't notice too. Is this result reproducible in your computer? -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 13, 2009