- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Documentation in the tarball?

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 02:25:49PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Hi! > > Does it make sense to include all developer documentation into the > tarball? As an alternative, only user documentation, plus a notice > where to find the developer docs, could be included, while the rest > can only be found in the repository at hg.dillo.org. I assume that > someone who is interested in the internals of dillo will anyway refer > to the lastest version from the Hg repository. > > Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: > > - It makes the tarball smaller. > > - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of > the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for > those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be > reasonable to spend some more disc space. > > What do you think? One disadvantage is no longer having both synced in the same tarball. Now, if docs live in the same hg repo as sources, but just don't make it into the tarball, I see no problems. They are kept in sync for devs, and the tarball goes smaller, in which case I do agree. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

On Sun, 24 May 2015 20:39:55 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > Sebastian wrote: > > Iceweasel (Firefox): > > View -> Page Style -> (No Style | Fresh, Revolution) > > Only now do I find that it's possible to get the menu bar back. I believe > mine disappeared when firefox decided to move everything into that stupid > three-horizontal-bars icon because they're trend-followers, and anyway I > thought that was just the new terrible way of things to not have access > to anything anymore. LOL! That is why I use PaleMoon browser. The same FireFox, but with classic interface. :D -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Sebastian wrote: > Iceweasel (Firefox): > View -> Page Style -> (No Style | Fresh, Revolution) Only now do I find that it's possible to get the menu bar back. I believe mine disappeared when firefox decided to move everything into that stupid three-horizontal-bars icon because they're trend-followers, and anyway I thought that was just the new terrible way of things to not have access to anything anymore.

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

On Sun, 24 May 2015 19:26:17 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are > available? > In firefox, all styles can be switched from "View|Page Style" menu. Also, there is a plugin that displays the available styles in the status bar, allows fast switching and can remember the preferred style for the particular web sites. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On So, Mai 24, 2015, eocene wrote: > John wrote: > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 > > eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > > > > John wrote: > > > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > > > > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > > > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > > > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? > > > > This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the > > whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: > > > > http://fresh.flatassembler.net > > > > The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user > > request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden > > menus. > > How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are > available? Iceweasel (Firefox): View -> Page Style -> (No Style | Fresh, Revolution) Haven't yet found out how it works with Chromium. In dillo, it should be rather simple to integrate the styles into the tools menu. Perhaps some configuration per site would be nice, too. Sebastian

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

John wrote: > On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 > eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > > John wrote: > > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? > > This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the > whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: > > http://fresh.flatassembler.net > > The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user > request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden > menus. How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are available?

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > John wrote: > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: http://fresh.flatassembler.net The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden menus. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

Documentation in the tarball?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Sebastian wrote: > Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: > > - It makes the tarball smaller. > > - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of > the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for > those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be > reasonable to spend some more disc space. > > What do you think? *agrees*

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

John wrote: > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web?

May 24, 2015

Documentation in the tarball?

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

Hi! Does it make sense to include all developer documentation into the tarball? As an alternative, only user documentation, plus a notice where to find the developer docs, could be included, while the rest can only be found in the repository at hg.dillo.org. I assume that someone who is interested in the internals of dillo will anyway refer to the lastest version from the Hg repository. Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: - It makes the tarball smaller. - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be reasonable to spend some more disc space. What do you think? Sebastian

May 24, 2015