- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Weirdly scaled images (again)

by fusionfile＠gmail.com

The Dillo user v4hn recently sent a message to this list regarding incorrect image scaling. She or he expresses exactly what I have on my mind: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-July/010596.html I use Dillo 3.0.4 from the Debian stable repositories and I experience the ugly image scaling on many sites, for instance on the two largest news (paper) sites here in Sweden: http://www.dn.se http://www.svd.se I can imagine that most people trying out Dillo will find the stretched-out images very off-putting. Changing the aspect ratio of an image is something you almost never want do do, and changing the aspect ratio of a photo is a big no-no. What's your view on this? Do you use Dillo with CSS disabled? Actually, I think it would be better if image scaling was not implemented at all, rather than broken like this. I'm not familiar with the Dillo code base but I'm a programmer proficient with C and I know some C++, so if I (with some hints) can help I would be more than glad to. Regards, August

July 28, 2015

[DNG] Will there be a MirDevuan "WTF"?

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

--- I sent this message three hours ago, but didn't include the list address. Sorry! --- On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:49:34PM -0700, James Powell wrote: ( shouldn't it be like below?, by the netiqette --see KalolaZ just arrived letter in the Multi-seat thread-- ? ) > > Since you would still like it around, in opportunistic or in some other > > way that I should call it, I think a question is due. > > Can you tell to the public what is the purpose of the > > user-not-asked-about, in fact mostly user-never-even-knowing-about-it > > encrypted ssh channel that dbus sets up, along with all the > > non-GNU-compatible remote procedure calls (which are there for what > > purpose?) that dbus implements? > > > > Is that for FOSS stands for? > > > First off cool your jets, and trying call me out on knowing the > internals of an IPC in Userspace I didn't develop is very childish. > Why not? If you're promoting it, or persuading Devuan into the acceptance of it? Anyway, can anyone answer that question? > I honestly don't care if D-Bus what it does other than be a > communication and messaging relay between applications and processes, > as long as it does what it does, and doesn't infringe on anything > else. > > D-Bus is used and is a requirement for some services and software. > You're unfortunately not going to have your cake and coffee with > getting rid of D-Bus. Well then, keep it for those cases, don't put it in all the Devuan boxen by default. Will be fine! > Yes, it's not the greatest design, but it is > friendly at least to the whole UNIX spectrum. > "friendly"... No comment. > Devuan's main purpose is getting rid of systemd as a hard dependency > and allowing user choice in init software, not ripping apart every > project to cater to ever niche and fundamentalist out there preaching > what they feel is FOSS, and also to not start a witch hunt on software > projects. What fundamentalists? The Gentoo folks? Thorsten mirabilos Glaser with his MirDebian "WTF" project, a fundamentalist? Me, a fundamentalist? What do you mean? My desire to, after have achived it for me (but only in Gentoo), some freedom and some security, to teach, if we get a true-foss Devuan that can get its MirDevuan "WTF" fork for itself, to teach newbies to build their system hardened-against-intrusion and surveillance-defeating, that desire of mine a fundamentalist desire? --- The rest cut out because somewhat made disorderly and illegible by probably hotmail defaults (that the immediate sender who I'm replying to apparently uses) or for some other reason. --- Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 23, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore renamed: www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft] > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here. Thanks! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 19, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:26:55PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 > I hope you'll find it interesting that that bug is now marked: RESOLVED WONTFIX https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c2 "What if you want dillo, but not libXft or everything else it pulls in?" (Jeroen Roovers) -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 18, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:57:31PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:22:15PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > > toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 > > > > That was a dillo-3.1-dev issue. > After masking it in my portage, I emerged dillo-3.0.5, and as you can > see in the bug, posting is possible (mostly): > ( link same as already given above ) > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 Nope! Have a look: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180#c8 (and that was with 3.0.5) > > -- > Miroslav Rovis > Zagreb, Croatia > http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 18, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:22:15PM +0200, miroslav.rovis1 at zg.ht.hr wrote: > It just happened, minutes ago. > > Easily seen in its effects: > > toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 > > (notice that also emerg --info that I attached has, instead of > spaces, the Α displayed, such as: > > https://555180.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=406994 > 2.6-r1::gentoosys-devel/autoconf: ... > ) > > However, as I immediately after posted on: > > Mutt without Portage/in Local Overlay > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781834 > where the exactly same text can be perfectly readable as it is > wrapped just fine, and which I explain in the immediately > following post in the same topic: > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781838 > > Could that Dillo's fault? > > The whole session of what happened online from my going online, to > logging into Bugzilla, the entire posting, end the surprising look > at what the post came out like, all is in these: > > 6d8bc1e8d0868d6864d4beb8678e13a533e813cc6f2a26ff1a14cb7cced1aec5 > dump_150717_1211_g0n.pcap > dc465d190560a5b7a058a2d1f996d43ef68e032fb66e4be1b265a5bfdab95630 > Screen_150717_1211_g0n.mkv > > (the traffic dump and the screencast) > > just in case we would need to analyze what happened. > > The Dillo is the same one, like I built it back when I wrote my: > > A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html > (haven't updated it since) > That was a dillo-3.1-dev issue. After masking it in my portage, I emerged dillo-3.0.5, and as you can see in the bug, posting is possible (mostly): ( link same as already given above ) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 17, 2015

no text wrapping on Gentoo Bugzilla

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

It just happened, minutes ago. Easily seen in its effects: toggle header weeding in Mutt doesn't work https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555180 (notice that also emerg --info that I attached has, instead of spaces, the Α displayed, such as: https://555180.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=406994 2.6-r1::gentoosys-devel/autoconf: ... ) However, as I immediately after posted on: Mutt without Portage/in Local Overlay https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781834 where the exactly same text can be perfectly readable as it is wrapped just fine, and which I explain in the immediately following post in the same topic: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1002146-start-50.html#7781838 Could that Dillo's fault? The whole session of what happened online from my going online, to logging into Bugzilla, the entire posting, end the surprising look at what the post came out like, all is in these: 6d8bc1e8d0868d6864d4beb8678e13a533e813cc6f2a26ff1a14cb7cced1aec5 dump_150717_1211_g0n.pcap dc465d190560a5b7a058a2d1f996d43ef68e032fb66e4be1b265a5bfdab95630 Screen_150717_1211_g0n.mkv (the traffic dump and the screencast) just in case we would need to analyze what happened. The Dillo is the same one, like I built it back when I wrote my: A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html (haven't updated it since) Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 17, 2015

Dillo 3.0.5 released

by eocene＠gmx.com

Jeremy wrote: > Are there any new config files that should be described? Nope.

July 14, 2015

Dillo 3.0.5 released

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

eocene wrote: > > All right, release is official... Linux From Scratch project wiki page updated: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/dillo3 Are there any new config files that should be described? Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 14, 2015

Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:34:24AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > And on Gentoo, it's the local overlay way for me to go. Studying to be > > able to accomplish that. > > I'm also a Gentoo user; not even a C programmer, let alone a > developer. I'd be interested in your ebuild. A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html And, Walter, I hope you noticed I gave you credit for my figuring out the bug in the current version at: Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588 Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 13, 2015