- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] IFRAME element stub

by Nikita V. Borodikhin

Hello, Stephen ! Stephen Lewis wrote: >> > There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does >> > nothing except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME >> > attributes(width and height) are not handled but this patch is >> > suitable for current temporary solution (as we do not have real >> > frame support for now). > > Just a comment about this - I'm using a recent CVS version some time > after this was integrated, and it causes some display issues with a lot > of sites. In particular, sites that use narrow IFRAMEs for ads in a > table(e.g. http://www.osnews.com, http://arstechnica.com/ ). The > displayed URL seems to force the column width to be much, much wider > than it normally would, making these websites look very bad (very wide > column with ads, very narrow column with actual text :/ ) > > It's great having this patch apart from the display issues it causes. > Would it be possible to make the displayed URL wrap? This is a consequence of currently used way to handle frames, as Links has. This IFRAME handler may be redesigned to use supplyed width and height, I think it is not too hard but I expect it is a _temporary_ solution intended just for having a link to IFRAME content until we do not have normal frames. > Stephen Lewis > slewis(a)paradise.net.nz Yours, Nikita

June 14, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] IFRAME element stub

by Stephen Lewis

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:32:22 -0400 (CLT) Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> wrote: > > Nikita, > > > Hi all Dillo developers ! > > > > There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does > > nothing except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME > > attributes(width and height) are not handled but this patch is > > suitable for current temporary solution (as we do not have real > > frame support for now). > > Done! Just a comment about this - I'm using a recent CVS version some time after this was integrated, and it causes some display issues with a lot of sites. In particular, sites that use narrow IFRAMEs for ads in a table(e.g. http://www.osnews.com, http://arstechnica.com/ ). The displayed URL seems to force the column width to be much, much wider than it normally would, making these websites look very bad (very wide column with ads, very narrow column with actual text :/ ) It's great having this patch apart from the display issues it causes. Would it be possible to make the displayed URL wrap? -- Stephen Lewis slewis(a)paradise.net.nz

June 14, 2003

Tabbed version of Dillo

by Frank de Lange

Hiya, I have finally found some time to work on my tabbed version of Dillo, which I mailed about last week. I hope to have it ready for first release in a few days. If anyone is planning extensive architectural changes to one of these files in the next few days, please let me know: interface.c html.c web.c nav.c plain.c cache.c capi.c browser.h Some other changes I made: - I separated the pagemark functionality into its own file, and renamed the functions from 'pagemarks' to a_Pagemark_... files pagemark.c/h - new files for tab and document functionality files tab.c/h, doc.c/h There is still quite a bit of 'interface' code in the document rendering path (just do a search for a_Interface_ and see from where these functions are called...). This needs to be dealt with for implementation of frames. I'm currently looking at this, but I will probably not implement it before I release the patch. Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

June 13, 2003

convert mozilla bookmarks to dillo

by Kyle Amon

Hi, I don't subscribe to this list, but I've been sweet on Dillo since about 1997 or 1998 (who knows). Anyway, I just wrote a trivial but usefull perl script to generate a Dillo bm.txt file from a Mozilla bookmarks.html file and thought others might be interested in using it as well. It is attached and posted on my homepage under Software. Enjoy, -- Kyle -- Kyle Amon email: amonk(a)gnutec.com url: http://www.gnutec.com/~amonk KeyID 1024D/4EB96E44 Fingerprint = E9EC 0046 8487 23D7 C91C D757 7B2A 8AE9 4EB9 6E44 "Learning isn't a duty that we must be flogged into performing; it's our birthright, our very human specialty and joy." - Jerry Farber The Student As Nigger This email Copyright 2003 by Kyle Amon, Inc., a Florida corporation, 6002 Palm Shadow Way, Suite 1218, Tampa, FL 33647: (813) 689-4041 amonk(a)gnutec.com http://www.gnutec.com/~amonk. All rights reserved.

June 12, 2003

gtk-list@gnome.org

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi, Is anyone here member of "gtk-list(a)gnome.org"? I sent an email some days ago there and it is being "held" for aproval because I'm not a member. If someone has a membership there please let me know to forward my message through him. Thanks Jorge.-

June 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] New program icons (not toolbars)

by Melvin Hadasht

> Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Gorgeous: (web1913) Gorgeous \Gor"geous\, a. [OF. gorgias beautiful, glorious, vain, luxurious; cf. OF. gorgias ruff, neck handkerchief, and F. gorge throat, and se pengorger to assume airs. Cf. Gorge, n.] Imposing through splendid or various colors; showy; fine; magnificent. The new icon set is all that.

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] New program icons (not toolbars)

by Chris Palmer

Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Nice!

June 11, 2003

New program icons (not toolbars)

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hy Guys! Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Enjoy Jorge.- PS: Poll is over, we all agreed on making JG's icons the default!!!

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] IFRAME element stub

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Nikita, > Hi all Dillo developers ! > > There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does nothing > except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME attributes > (width and height) are not handled but this patch is suitable for current > temporary solution (as we do not have real frame support for now). Done! Cheers Jorge.-

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Strange condition in cache.c old code

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Nikita, > Hello old Dillo developers ! Hi! > Explain me please what is 1024 in the following code for. I read HTML and > HTTP/1.1 (rfc2616) specifications but didn't find an answer. FYI: Dillo uses HTTP/1.0. > I think this > condition must be wiped out because some servers (linux.org.ru for example) > give too long responses. > > [...] > > /* > * Process redirections (HTTP 30x answers) > * (This is a work in progress --not finished yet) > */ > int Cache_redirect(CacheData_t *entry, int Flags, BrowserWindow *bw) > { > if ( ((entry->Flags & CA_Redirect) && entry->Location) && > ((entry->Flags & CA_ForceRedirect) || !entry->ValidSize || > entry->ValidSize < 1024 ) ) { IIRC this is an heuristical boundary. Some servers don't send entity content within an http redirection (Correct behaviour IMHO). Some send a short default message as entity content (something so redundant as "This page is being redirected"), and some others send a full page that can be anything! The "1024" somehow decides this: < 1024: Short redirection message. > 1024: Don't know what is this large page! I also have a vague memory in my mind about how the http redirection data stream is (or isn't) cut in order to make the redirection. The "1024" threshold may "solve" this somehow. This is where you need to start investigating. HTH Jorge.-

June 11, 2003