- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Paul Pelzl

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:01AM -0400, landy wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:23, Kelson Vibber wrote: > > On Monday 29 September 2003 5:25 pm, landy wrote: > > > thanks a million, > > > > > > i ma having problems with the tab patch, how do i apply it? > > > > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel/1108 > > when i follow those instructions i get this > > > > illustre@pepino:~/dillo-0.7.3/src> patch -p1 < > ~/dillo-20030926-tabs.patch I think you have two problems: 1) You need the patch for Dillo 0.7.3; based on the filename I think you have the patch for Dillo CVS. Look here: http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/dillo-0.7.3-20030926-tabs.patch.gz 2) Try applying the patch from within the dillo-0.7.3/ directory, *not* from the dillo-0.7.3/src/ subdirectory. Paul

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Johann Koenig

On Tuesday September 30 at 07:24am landy <landy(a)despiertapr.com> wrote: > illustre@pepino:~/dillo-0.7.3/src> patch -p1 < > ~/dillo-20030926-tabs.patch It looks like you are using the CVS patch, when you need the .7.3 release patch -- -johann koenig Now Playing: Mustard Plug - Just A Minute : Still Standing (Disc 4) Today is Pungenday, the 54th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3169 My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/johannkoenig.pgp

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by landy

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:23, Kelson Vibber wrote: > On Monday 29 September 2003 5:25 pm, landy wrote: > > thanks a million, > > > > i ma having problems with the tab patch, how do i apply it? > > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel/1108 when i follow those instructions i get this > illustre@pepino:~/dillo-0.7.3/src> patch -p1 < ~/dillo-20030926-tabs.patch can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -pruN dillo/ChangeLog dillo_tabs/ChangeLog |--- dillo/ChangeLog 2003-09-26 18:29:11.031152368 +0200 |+++ dillo_tabs/ChangeLog 2003-09-26 18:29:11.124138232 +0200 -------------------------- File to patch: > Just use the right paths for the Dillo source, and update the version number > on the patch. (Also, be sure you're using the right version of the patch - > if you've downloaded Dillo 0.7.3, use the patch for 0.7.3. If you're using a > CVS snapshot, use the patch for CVS.)

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Frank de Lange

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:05:48PM -0400, landy wrote: > well i admit that either i am blind or can't look correctly but in cvs i > do not see any patches. > > i was told there several patches out there for dillo There are... They are just not advertised on the main Dillo site (unfortunately). Google for dillo patch and you'll find quite a few. For starters I can point to my patch page, which hosts the tab + frame patch: http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/ This patch adds tabbed browsing and (i)frame support to Dillo, as well as some other minor improvements (interactive search, option to use status bar for search instead of popup window, etc). Other people have patched Dillo for Japanese language, external program launching, HTTP AUTH support, image resizing (like Opera), and more. There is also a new fork which adds support for MacOS X and Windows. Just browse through the mailing list archives for some more information... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +46-734352015 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Kelson Vibber

On Monday 29 September 2003 5:25 pm, landy wrote: > thanks a million, > > i ma having problems with the tab patch, how do i apply it? See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel/1108 Just use the right paths for the Dillo source, and update the version number on the patch. (Also, be sure you're using the right version of the patch - if you've downloaded Dillo 0.7.3, use the patch for 0.7.3. If you're using a CVS snapshot, use the patch for CVS.) -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

Sept. 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Kelson Vibber

At 04:05 PM 9/29/2003, landy wrote: >well i admit that either i am blind or can't look correctly but in cvs i >do not see any patches. > >i was told there several patches out there for dillo They aren't in CVS. Generally, the people who maintain the patches post them on their own websites. Often they post the information on the mailing list. There used to be a partial list on the Dillo home page, but either it's gone or I can't find it anymore. I still have links to several at the bottom of http://www.hyperborea.org/software/dillo/modified.html Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

Sept. 29, 2003

patches

by landy

well i admit that either i am blind or can't look correctly but in cvs i do not see any patches. i was told there several patches out there for dillo

Sept. 29, 2003

Dillo Configuration

by Ringwraith

I'd first like to say thanks for Dillo, its sooo great loading the complete list of CPAN modules in less than 2 seconds, as compared with the nice 5 to 10 seconds with mozilla/firebird :) I do not know if this has been discussed but: One thing I noticed, as Dillo matures, it will obviously need a configuration/preferences menu. I am really starting to get pissed off (pardon lang) at how other browsers use the standard toolkit based widgets to do their configuration. This, IMHO, with the features of today's browsers, clutters up the user interface and causes bloat with the browser. I think having a PURE html interface to doing web browser configuration would do two important things: 1. Gives the flexibility to have a feature rich browser while maintain simplicity. It is a web browser, 90% of the user interface is a web page, so why not make the GUI something the user is familiar with. 2. Reduces bloat. IMHO not so much importantly, 3. Allows for nice customization (themes) of the user interface by someone who knows HTML and vi w/o having to recompile dillo. ;) I am considering to attempt to make a module for the configuration of Dillo that will do this: 1. Configure all aspect of the browser including the (upcoming?) plugin support. 2. Allow pluggable configuration. If plugins have any configurable options (sometimes they do), they will also be configurable using the interface. This module would be accessed through something like: config:// or about:config (i like config:// much better) It would obviously have some security built in so that no one can pull a IE type trick on us and be able to do things they shouldn't. Anyhow this is just a brainstorm, what are your thoughts on doing something like this?

Sept. 29, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Yes or No: optional compilation of 'extra' features

by Frank de Lange

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:41:19PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Its not a matter of liking or not, users may simply ignore tabs (and > there may perhaps be a _user_ option for alternative presentations of > frames). However, conditional compilation makes maintaining more > difficult (and since that's the task of Jorge and me, the list is the > wrong place to ask) ...beep... wrong I could of course split the tree, and maintain the tabbed/framed version separately. The list is the place to ask all developers, there is no hierarchy in this brave new world, if one does not pick up a task someone else will... I think the list is a good place to ask things like this, since that is the place where (prospective) developers go for information on these issues. , so it is a question whether the reduced binary > size outweighs the increased maintaining problems. For you, maybe. For someone who wants as small a program as possible, maybe not. Who are we to say? The thing is, currently there is a clear separation in the code, which does seem to be beneficial for at least some people. Removing that separation makes it a bit easier to maintain the code later on, but also removes the benefits. Choice is good... The needs of the many, or the few, outweigh the needs of the one (thanks, Spock). Anyway, I vote to keep the separation of the tab code, but remove the separation for the frame code. > What I meant is that the link menu should have to entries, "Open link > in new tab", and "Open link in new background tab" (or so). Options > should reflect different user's taste, while this difference depends > on the situation. That can be implemented simply, but clutters the menu. I think having the option to chose a default behaviour is a good thing. The default is eg. used when opening a tab for the "_blank" URL target, on middle click, etc. Renaming Doc to something else is no big deal, but should only be done when really needed. And Doc does not deal with presentation, it deals with keeping state for a document. Presentation is BrowserWindow, Tab, Frameset, Frame. Or it should be, in any case. The separation is not really complete yet... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +46-734352015 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Sept. 28, 2003

Problems with cookies

by johannes leimbach

Hi ! I am using dillo 0.7.3 on my gentoo box, and it just works great! It's fast, does good rendering, short: I like it One thing bugs me though, it does not save cookies from any message boards (PHPBB). I have cookies enabled (DEFAULT ACCEPT in cookiesrc, file cookies does exist), but still: No writing. I have just noticed google does place a cookie, so it isn't entirely borked. Hey, how can i change this? It would rally make that browser perfect :) Thanks for answer & cu

Sept. 28, 2003