- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] wanted: CPU overhead source.

by Johannes Hofmann

Hi, I just profiled cvs- and 0.7.3 version. I used http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ stored locally on disk (utilities.html rendered too fast here). I could not yet get any reproducible results from profiling, but cvs is obviously slower 5.1 vs. 3.9 seconds. And with cvs the GUI freezes until the whole page is loaded, whereas 0.7.3 displays the GUI while it is rendering the page (you can see the "Kb" counting in the upper right corner). Regards, Johannes Hofmann On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:09:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Hi, > > I just noticed that utilities.html (from ImageMagick manual), > takes near three times more time to render with CVS than with > 0.7.3. > > That page is 230KB and has no images. It takes 3 seconds to > render with 0.7.3 vs 9 seconds of CVS (on a slow machine). > > The same is true for the new and old parser. > > Can somebody please profile it to find the overhead source? > (./configure --enable-gprof). > > > TIA > Jorge.- > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

Dec. 3, 2003

A Message For You

by From eLove

Finally, a BETTER and SAFER way to meet QUALITY SINGLES in YOUR area! Go to http://www.elove.com to find out more. The Safe, Smart Way to Connect. eLove is a safe, confidential and easy way to meet quality singles. Our members are intelligent, attractive, professionals in search of meaningful relationships. Discover the freedom of Trust. Explore romance without fear or worry. The eLove method focuses on trust. Unlike online personals, where many people are not who they say they are, we screen all our members so you'll feel confident that you're meeting genuine people. No Games Online chatting seldom works. eLove is for people who truly want to meet someone special and don't have time for playing games. What are you waiting for? Boost Your Social Life. Revel in Romance. Get A Love Life. Why is eLove the best way for great people to connect? Ever wonder how successful couples met and fell in love? The eLove System Revealed. Follow the link below to unsubscribe from all future mailings associated with this list http://lfemail.com/unsub.lf/cid/1855/rid/14147/email/Dillo-dev@lists.auriga…

Dec. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] gcc 2.95 doesn't know about -Wno-unused-parameter

by David McKee

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, David McKee wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > [attribution to me lost] > > > > my gcc doesn't believe in -Wno-unused-parameters, > [snip] > > > Attached is a patch > [snip] > > Commited. > > Does it work for you David? > Perfectly. Thanks. Having said that on the basis of my gcc 2.95 based debian machine at home, I tried it on my work machine. The Redhat box actual uses: $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) *sigh* My attempts to read the auto<whatever> docs last week were very depressing, so I just looked at configure.in, and ponied up this fix: ========== --- dillo/configure.in Wed Dec 3 11:48:31 2003 +++ dillo_tweaked/configure.in Wed Dec 3 11:32:18 2003 @@ -201,7 +201,9 @@ if eval "test x$GCC = xyes"; then fi if test "`echo $CFLAGS | grep '\-W[^a]' 2> /dev/null`" = ""; then if test "`$CC -v 2>&1 | grep 'version 2'`" = ""; then - CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -W -Wno-unused-parameter" + if test "`$CC -v 2>&1 | grep 'version egcs-2'`" = ""; then + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -W -Wno-unused-parameter" + fi fi fi if test "`echo $CFLAGS | grep '\-Waggregate-return' 2> /dev/null`" = ""; then ========== which simply adds anther test to exclude gcc 2.* based egcs releases before sticking in the new flags... Style question: Would it be better to test for the presence of the flag than to try to exclude those compilers without it? Anyway, thanks for the work. -- -- David McKee -- dmckee(a)jlab.org -- (757) 269-7492 (Office)

Dec. 3, 2003

dead link behavior

by Peter Milne

Greetings all, Was wondering if it is me or if it was normal. If I click a link and it turns out to be a dead link.....everything locks up hard and I have to 'xkill' Dillo. Thanks, -- ~~~Pete~~~ http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com

Dec. 3, 2003

wanted: CPU overhead source.

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi, I just noticed that utilities.html (from ImageMagick manual), takes near three times more time to render with CVS than with 0.7.3. That page is 230KB and has no images. It takes 3 seconds to render with 0.7.3 vs 9 seconds of CVS (on a slow machine). The same is true for the new and old parser. Can somebody please profile it to find the overhead source? (./configure --enable-gprof). TIA Jorge.-

Dec. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [INFRINGEMENT... errr PATCH] Html_image_menu signal propagation cleanup

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Frank de Lange wrote: > Hi'all, > > First, forgive me the snide remark in the title, I am not that fond of > lawyer-speak. You have the freedom to modificate or contribute (or both), but please don't keep posting bad-seeds to dillo-dev. > Second, this is a small cleanup for html.c which removes the need for an > explicit signal emission stop in Html_image_menu. The comment in > html.c:Html_image_menu() reads: > [...] Done. (& thanks for the nice explanation). Sincerely Jorge.-

Dec. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Patch to allow setting of initial position

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Jan, > Eric GAUDET wrote: > > It works for me with today's CVS and your patch. > > > > in dillorc: > > geometry=320x200+50+50 > > > > dillo.pos/src>./dillo > > Setting geometry from rc to 320x200 50 50 > > ... > > > > The first one is actually used, but having the second message is confusing. > > Those can probably both go entirely. It was more for debug uses. Here is > an updated patch with those removed. > > Jan Fore unknown reasons, gcc 3.2.2 gives me this error: <q> In file included from IO/Url.h:7, from IO/mime.h:14, from dillo.c:47: IO/IO.h:40: unnamed fields of type other than struct or union are not allowed make[1]: *** [dillo.o] Error 1 </q> when X11/Xlib.h is included from dillo.c. The interesting part is that libDio.a compiles flawlessly. I moved the call into misc.c (which gives no problems) and also made a custom function. I prefer this one (to avoid X11/Xlib.h). I'm sending you this version of the patch (outside dillo-dev), so you can review it and comment. Cheers Jorge.- PS: there's no need to CC' me, I read dillo-dev.

Dec. 3, 2003

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Dillo-Patches mailing list

by Paul Pelzl

The recent "Official Statement" from the core Dillo developers contained this item: > We strongly urge the "code modifiers" to find their own mailing list > for discussing their "code modification" ideas In response, I would like to announce the dillo-patches mailing list. This list will provide a place for both users and developers to discuss extensive modifications of the Dillo sources, which are beyond the scope of the Dillo Project itself. If you are interested in some of the significant feature-enhancement patches that have been posted on dillo-dev recently, then I hope you will subscribe to dillo-patches. - You can subscribe to the list by sending email to dillo-patches-request(a)freelists.org with 'subscribe' in the Subject field OR by logging into the Web interface at www.freelists.org. - To post on the mailing list, send email to dillo-patches(a)freelists.org . Only subscribers may post to the list. - There is a Dillo-Patches website available at http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dillo-patches . It has some information about the list, has links to the archives, and will guide people in finding patches. I hope that this list will help to resolve some of the recent difficulties on dillo-dev. Jorge (or whoever has web access): It would be helpful to provide a link to http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dillo-patches somewhere on the Dillo website. Paul

Dec. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] gcc 2.95 doesn't know about -Wno-unused-parameter

by David McKee

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: [attribution to me lost] > > > my gcc doesn't believe in -Wno-unused-parameters, [snip] > > Attached is a patch [snip] > Commited. > Does it work for you David? Perfectly. Thanks. -- -- David McKee -- dmckee(a)jlab.org -- (757) 269-7492 (Office)

Dec. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] gcc 2.95 doesn't know about -Wno-unused-parameter

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Hi > > > > I suppose you're getting tired of hearing about my ancient Redhat > > > system, but my gcc doesn't believe in -Wno-unused-parameters, preferning > > Same on FreeBSD which also still uses 2.95. I think there are lots > of systems that still use gcc2.95 > > > If you add a simple way to test whether gcc accepts the warning > > option, in configure.in, it'd be ok. > > Attached is a patch wich does just that. However, it assumes that the > -Wno-unused-parameters appeared with version 3 of gcc. A quick > google search seems to confirm that this option was introduced with > gcc 3.0 - can anybody with gcc 3.0 confirm that ? > > The patch also fixes some problems with detection of /usr/local > in the default path. > > This patch works on a FreeBSD 4.8 system (gcc 2.95) and a > Suse 8.2 system (gcc3.2). Commited. Does it work for you David? Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 2, 2003