- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Merry Christmas! I've got presents :-)

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Benjamin wrote: > The biggest changes are the preferences dialog and the libcurl-based > downloader, which removes Dillo's dependency on wget and allows it to > function as a completely self-contained executable. (By default it's > disabled, and Dillo continues to use the old downloads DPI.) Wow! Naturally one begins to wonder about having such features in the real dillo :)

Dec. 27, 2010

Merry Christmas! I've got presents :-)

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

Specifically, the latest round of patches: http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/dillo/patches.php The biggest changes are the preferences dialog and the libcurl-based downloader, which removes Dillo's dependency on wget and allows it to function as a completely self-contained executable. (By default it's disabled, and Dillo continues to use the old downloads DPI.) There are also various smaller fixes, including a slightly-reworked DNS patch. With static linking and UPX compression, I've got the Windows binary down to a single 1.2MB executable: http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/files/dillo.exe Just thought I'd share in case anyone was interested. ~Benjamin

Dec. 27, 2010

Re: complex buttons and limit text width

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:07:40PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Do you remember whether that was a Hard Problem, or just > > one that we didn't get around to looking into? > > I don't remember, but a 100% CPU hog sounds fixable. Haha, famous last words. I still didn't find cause. It's a redraw loop somehow. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 20, 2010

[patch]: CSS parser cleanup and media-conditional @import.

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 05:26:05PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > > for some reason I thought I had already answered this... > > That's strange! The only record I have (in memory or file system) is > a reply from corvid. Maybe I'm losing track! :-) No no, it was me loosing track. I checked my sent mail and I hadn't sent the reply - I just thought I did :-)

Dec. 18, 2010

[patch]: CSS parser cleanup and media-conditional @import.

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > for some reason I thought I had already answered this... That's strange! The only record I have (in memory or file system) is a reply from corvid. Maybe I'm losing track! :-) > Anyway, I already looked at it and tested it a little and it seems > fine to me. > Just go ahead and commit. Thanks, it's done. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Dec. 18, 2010

[patch]: CSS parser cleanup and media-conditional @import.

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:59:09AM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Reposting my CSS parser cleanup patches and adding the implementation > of CSS2 media-conditional @import rules. Please comment. for some reason I thought I had already answered this... Anyway, I already looked at it and tested it a little and it seems fine to me. Just go ahead and commit. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 18, 2010

[patch]: CSS parser cleanup and media-conditional @import.

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Reposting my CSS parser cleanup patches and adding the implementation of CSS2 media-conditional @import rules. Please comment. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Dec. 18, 2010

patch: border-color: transparent

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > Is there an open-issue/reason-not-to-commit it? > > I just wanted others to have a look at it first since I don't know > cssparser/styleengine in any detail. Looks good to me. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 14, 2010

patch: border-color: transparent

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > Is there an open-issue/reason-not-to-commit it? I just wanted others to have a look at it first since I don't know cssparser/styleengine in any detail.

Dec. 14, 2010

patch: border-color: transparent

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:02:08AM +0000, corvid wrote: > With user agent set to firefox, google likes to give me a > border-color: transparent, and I was tired of the no-values msg. It looks OK, according to the SPEC: <quote CSS3> 4.2.3. "transparent" color keyword CSS1 introduced the "transparent" value for the background-color property. CSS2 allowed border-color to also accept the "transparent" value. The Open eBook(tm) Publication Structure 1.0.1 [OEB101] extended the "color" property to also accept the "transparent" keyword. CSS3 extends the color value to include the "transparent" keyword to allow its use with all properties that accept a <color> value. This simplifies the definition of those properties in CSS3. transparent Fully transparent. This keyword can be considered a shorthand for transparent black, rgba(0,0,0,0), which is its computed value. </quote> Is there an open-issue/reason-not-to-commit it? -- Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 14, 2010