July 2015 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Fonts not found issue persists in 3.0.5

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

I got the new Dillo version 3.0.5 (in the master air-gapped box, which I yet have to clone onto this, for online, same hardware box), as it is available in gentoo: https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/dillo/ but my problem with fonts (the FAQ issue http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q27) to which eocene has kindly given the tip for in his message: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-April/010500.html For people reading this message offline, I'll paste his advice, since it is also important: If you go to dw/fltkplatform.cc and, in FltkFont::initSystemFonts(), remove the leading underscore in _MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", to get MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "", and recompile, what does dillo say when you run it? And I was saying that that problem I still have in my 3.0.5. I hoped it would have been solved, but since it hasn't been, for me who am not really a developer, to go and recompile means first get (finally, it's been waiting for me since long) a little really deeper and dirty with the Gentoo ebuild system, and, basically compile my own ebuild... or... Or get Gentoo developers to do it for all of the Dillo Gentoo users. Since my eyes are sore from too small and non configurable fonts, I'm afraid I will have to do one of the above... For the latter, since this issue has been discussed, and previous to eocene's message you can see that I extensively described it, what do kind Dillo devs think: the second route to take, which is: file a bug on Gentoo bugzilla with basically updated real output from the new Dillo 3.0.5, might probably be shorter route to get this issue fixed? That is what I should try first, isn't it. Oh, well, I hope I haven't been too lengthy.,, Another issue I also have. Can't log into: https://github.com/miroR And was able to log into it with lynx, and open my new repo https://github.com/miroR/flowstamp So it doesn't seem to be github follows the big JS-and-all browsers else-get-lost policy like soo many... Depending on the soonness of the fonts solution, I'd be willing to provide more information, such as the full screencast/traffic-dump of my future attempt to log into Github, so we get this done... Depending on that being solved (I'm not expert by any means, and who knows if I get any help from Gentoo devs, who are overworked). Really depending on the fonts issue being solve first, as my eyes hurt (born with somewhat poor eyesight, but getting worse, am 58 ys of age). Cheers, and keep up the good work. I hope you all keep in harmony, as soo much if missing for Dillo to become a complete browser... I'll be pretty sad if any bad rifts were to appear among the team... Pls. find the right way between yourselves, and do only what is right and honest for all of you! Much is missing in the Dillo, but, you seem to be the strongest around that keep free! Free from surveillors! I was really right when in what I posted on: Secure: yes, Though Features Missing; and Bugs http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-April/010495.html (too much to paste for offline readers, but in short, I compared the Firefox harvesting on users with the sea-calm when online of kind and secure Dillo) Kind regards, -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 7, 2015

The FAQ example on png/redirection not anymore accurate

by miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr

Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I write is in my best understanding and with the intention to help my most used browser get even better. The FAQ entry: "Why doesn't Dillo display certain images?" at: http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q28 doesn't show any of: ... ... 'blog.reuters.com' to 'ad.doubleclick.net' ... as the text currently reads, which probably means they have read our FAQ and decided to change those redirections. This is what I actually get when I uncomment the line which is commented the way the built-in default settings are, as it says in the top of ~/.dillo/dillorc to read: show_msg=YES (but it shows the same even if I leave if commented out; it's the default, I retried with it commented out: same) $ Domain: Default accept. dillo_dns_init: Here we go! (threaded) Enabling cookies as from cookiesrc... ** WARNING **: preferred sans-serif font "DejaVu Sans" not found. ** WARNING **: preferred serif font "DejaVu Serif" not found. ** WARNING **: preferred monospace font "DejaVu Sans Mono" not found. ** WARNING **: preferred cursive font "URW Chancery L" not found. ** WARNING **: preferred fantasy font "DejaVu Sans" not found. Nav_open_url: new url='about:splash' Nav_open_url: new url='http://en.wikipedia.org' Dns_server [0]: en.wikipedia.org is 91.198.174.192 2620:0:862:ed1a::1 Connecting to 91.198.174.192 Nav_open_url: new url='https://en.wikipedia.org/' Nav_open_url: new url='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page' NumPendingStyleSheets=1 NumPendingStyleSheets=2 Png_error_handling: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile So probably the example should be changed to reflect this changed reality, so users would not get confused as they will probably see none of those 'reuters' lines in the messages on their terminal. Maybe it would be sufficient to just rewrite that item of the FAQ to mean that previously they would have seen those messages... Don't know. Again, correct me if I'm wrong. On another note, I got the new 3.0.5, as it is available in gentoo, but I have the same fonts not found issue which I had previously described (and it's there in yesterday's real output form my system, further above; it was yesterday, the delay being for unrelated reasons), and about which (the fonts not found issue) I will next send another message, with different, appropriate subject, to this list, I hope. Cheers! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

July 7, 2015

what is done with the dillo project donation money?

by eocene＠gmx.com

I've wondered what is done with the dillo project donation money. Does it go toward Andreas's hosting costs or something?

July 6, 2015

Site is down?

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Just noticed I can't contact the website, is it down? I can access it fine. Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 4, 2015

Site is down?

by abe＠deuxchevaux.org

Hi, On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:17:57PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Just noticed I can't contact the website, is it down? http://www.dillo.org/ works fine for me. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe at deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe at noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)

July 3, 2015

Site is down?

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, Just noticed I can't contact the website, is it down? -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 3, 2015

Dillo 3.0.5 released

by eocene＠gmx.com

All right, release is official... Thanks everyone! PS Here are the changes that found their way into ChangeLog: Image buffer/cache improvements. Fix for segfault when there's no dpid and view source is requested. Fix view-source dpi to handle null characters correctly. Made view-source dpi use CSS formatting (it's shorter and cleaner). Crosscompile/buildroot-friendly fltk-config test. Fix X11 icon name. In location bar, tend toward showing beginning of URL instead of end. Handle irix's version of vsnprintf(). INPUT, TEXTAREA placeholder attribute. Better notification when user's domainrc settings block page redirection. Fix bug with font_factor preference and CSS font-size:(larger|smaller). Recognize Menu key in keysrc. HTTPS: change cipher list to "ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!EXPORT40:!RC4", disable SSL3, disable TLS compression. Avoid requesting background images if an ancestor has display:none. Ignore built-in search url if any are specified in dillorc.

July 2, 2015

Here's 3.0.5 RC1

by v4hn＠lunar-linux.org

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:55:08PM +0000, eocene wrote: > Now there's a 3.0.5 tarball: > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2 > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2.asc > > Please test, send feedback, Builds and runs smoothly on Lunar-Linux. Thanks a lot! v4hn

July 1, 2015

Here's 3.0.5 RC1

by abe＠deuxchevaux.org

Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:55:08PM +0000, eocene wrote: > Now there's a 3.0.5 tarball: > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2 > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2.asc > > Please test, send feedback, and if all is well, I'll make an > official announcement in a couple of days... Built fine on all Debian architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dillo http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=dillo&suite=sid Works fine on at least Debian's amd64 architecture. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe at deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe at noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)

July 1, 2015

Here's 3.0.5 RC1

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:55:08PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > Now there's a 3.0.5 tarball: > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2 > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.5.tar.bz2.asc > > Please test, send feedback, and if all is well, I'll make an > official announcement in a couple of days... Works fine here on DragonFly BSD. Cheers, Johannes

July 1, 2015