April 2014 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Dillo and Irix

by diegel＠work.de

eocene wrote: > Jan wrote: >> Query: {GE} >> a_IO_ccc : OpSend [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 > > "GE" is the entire query? Yes exactly. Any idea?

April 7, 2014

Dillo and Irix

by eocene＠gmx.com

Jan wrote: > Query: {GE} > a_IO_ccc : OpSend [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 "GE" is the entire query?

April 7, 2014

Dillo and Irix

by diegel＠work.de

Hello, I just started another attempt to port dillo to Irix. With gcc 4.7 it compiles without any serious warnings. It starts and about:splash shows up correctly, But if you want to use it something goes wrong: ftp works without problems. files show up if the path is very short (less than 32 bytes). If you browse directories and you want to change from /tmp to /tmp/x for example. I changes to /x http doesn't work at all. If you go to a non existing url. For example: http://test.yy you get the following console output, but nothing happens in the dollo window: Nav_open_url: new url='http:test.yy' a_Capi_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262fa8 Flags=0 a_Dpi_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262da0 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262e90 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262eb8 Flags=0 a_Http_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262f80 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262e40 Flags=0 Http_must_use_proxy: http:test.yy NO DNS error: HOST_NOT_FOUND Dns_server [0]: is (nil) a_IO_ccc : OpAbort [1B] Info=10262e40 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpAbort [1F] Info=10262eb8 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpAbort [2B] Info=10262fa8 Flags=0 a_Dpi_ccc : OpAbort [2B] Info=10262da0 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpAbort [2B] Info=10262e90 Flags=0 If you are opening an existing url like dillo.org it puts out: Nav_open_url: new url='http://www.dillo.org/' a_Capi_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262fd0 Flags=0 a_Dpi_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262f08 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpStart [2B] Info=10262e68 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262ee0 Flags=0 a_Http_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262e90 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpStart [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 Http_must_use_proxy: http://www.dillo.org/ NO Dns_server [0]: www.dillo.org is 85.214.105.140 Connecting to 85.214.105.140 a_IO_ccc : OpSend [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpSend [1F] Info=10262ee0 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpSend [2B] Info=10262fd0 Flags=0 a_Dpi_ccc : OpSend [2B] Info=10262f08 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpSend [2B] Info=10262e68 Flags=0 http, referer='Referer: http://www.dillo.org/ ' Query: {GE} a_IO_ccc : OpSend [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 and after some seconds: a_IO_ccc : OpEnd [2F] Info=10262e68 Flags=0 a_Dpi_ccc : OpEnd [2F] Info=10262f08 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpEnd [2F] Info=10262fd0 Flags=0 a_Capi_ccc : OpEnd [1B] Info=10262ee0 Flags=0 a_Http_ccc : OpEnd [1B] Info=10262e90 Flags=0 a_IO_ccc : OpEnd [1B] Info=10262f30 Flags=0 but nothing happens in the dillo window. I would be very happy to get any hint what is going wrong here. Thanks you, Jan

April 7, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On So, Apr 06, 2014, eocene wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > I guess we don't support this negative text-indent. > > Did we ever do anything about negative margins? I remember that > being brought up in the early stages of css, where it wasn't > going to be easy to get dw to deal with it... I plan a redesign of dw sizes soon, after floats, before absolute positions. I'll see how it fits in there. (It's on my list now.) Sebastian

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Johannes wrote: > I guess we don't support this negative text-indent. Did we ever do anything about negative margins? I remember that being brought up in the early stages of css, where it wasn't going to be easy to get dw to deal with it...

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 02:11:14PM +0000, eocene wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while > > now and I like it more than without it. > > Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites > > you go to. > > Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > > things worse? > > I just started turning it on regularly for this persistent connections > testing, and had been browsing as much to exercise that code as to > _browse_, so I don't remember much at the moment. But I happen to > remember that the appearance of the top of http://straightdope.com > was dismaying. Interesting. They try to move the text somewhere to the left to make it invisible if CSS is enabled: #header .site_tagline a { display: block; width: 788px; height: 116px; text-indent: -2000px; } I guess we don't support this negative text-indent.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

> Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > things worse? About halfway down the page at http://arstechnica.com , there's a picture of a bearded guy, and in hard-to-read gray on the background image there's text like "feature story" and "i had my dna analyzed..." I've noticed how sometimes the top of a background image will be repeated, and wondered why that happens.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Johannes wrote: > I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while > now and I like it more than without it. > Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites > you go to. > Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > things worse? I just started turning it on regularly for this persistent connections testing, and had been browsing as much to exercise that code as to _browse_, so I don't remember much at the moment. But I happen to remember that the appearance of the top of http://straightdope.com was dismaying.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > Once you know that load_background_images can be toggled from the menu, > it's good, but our css/rendering is still incomplete enough that > background images obscure text rather frequently. I think > load_background_images=YES by default may make the experience of > trying out dillo a negative one. I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while now and I like it more than without it. Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites you go to. Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes things worse? Cheers, Johannes

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Once you know that load_background_images can be toggled from the menu, it's good, but our css/rendering is still incomplete enough that background images obscure text rather frequently. I think load_background_images=YES by default may make the experience of trying out dillo a negative one.

April 5, 2014