September 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:21:00PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:33:09PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > I just finished submitting the release announcement to > > freshmeat; it tipically takes much less than 24 hours to make its > > way into the front page. > > Is the tar ball now the same then with 3.0 RC3 or has the link fix > from corvid been included? > > http://hg.dillo.org/dillo/rev/55d964c61877 > > I'd prefer the latter. It has the typo. After all these years I've been bitten more than once by the one-liner fix that carries another problem, so I preferred to err on the safe side (with all the testing given to the tarball) and release it. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Axel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:33:09PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > I just finished submitting the release announcement to > > freshmeat; it tipically takes much less than 24 hours to make its > > way into the front page. > > Is the tar ball now the same then with 3.0 RC3 or has the link fix > from corvid been included? > > http://hg.dillo.org/dillo/rev/55d964c61877 > > I'd prefer the latter. I didn't make the fix until after the announcement, reasoning that it wasn't worth delaying release, changing tags, etc., for something in the doc/ directory where no one ever ventures anyway.

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by abe＠deuxchevaux.org

Hi, On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:33:09PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > I just finished submitting the release announcement to > freshmeat; it tipically takes much less than 24 hours to make its > way into the front page. Is the tar ball now the same then with 3.0 RC3 or has the link fix from corvid been included? http://hg.dillo.org/dillo/rev/55d964c61877 I'd prefer the latter. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe at deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | abe at noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:26:15PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi there, > [...] > dillo-3.0 is available from: > > http://www.dillo.org/download/ > > > This should be our last release candidate, unless something major > appears. Please download, build, test and report how it goes. > > If there's no show stopper in a couple of days, the announcement > to the outside world will be made. ;) Thanks a lot to those that took the time to build and check this tarball. I just finished submitting the release announcement to freshmeat; it tipically takes much less than 24 hours to make its way into the front page. So, finally, our dillo-3.0 release is now official! Thanks again to every single person that has contributed to make this release possible, and along the years the existence of the project possible. Cheers! -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0-rc2 is out

by corvid＠lavabit.com

higuita wrote: > > > problem comes from the fltk... bisect it i found that fltk 1.3 > > > revision 9023 makes the openning/close of the tabs slower in my > > > machine. > > Do pages with lots of circles for unordered list items give you > > any trouble? > > testing with this page: > > http://www.stylegala.com/features/bulletmadness/ > > i dont see any difference before and after that commit. Hmm. Well, if you go into src/uicmd.cc and change the instances of FL_PLASTIC_ROUND_UP_BOX to FL_PLASTIC_UP_BOX, or FL_FLAT_BOX, or FL_NO_BOX, does tab behaviour get better?

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0-rc2 is out

by higuita7＠yahoo.co.uk

Hi again > > problem comes from the fltk... bisect it i found that fltk 1.3 > > revision 9023 makes the openning/close of the tabs slower in my > > machine. > Do pages with lots of circles for unordered list items give you > any trouble? testing with this page: http://www.stylegala.com/features/bulletmadness/ i dont see any difference before and after that commit. higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:33:33PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:08:31PM -0800, Roger wrote > >> Appears to compile & execute fine on i686 Gentoo (Intel P3 2x750). > > Also on 64-bit Gentoo on an Intel i3. > >> If nobody else has published a Gentoo EBuild script for packaging, >> I'll try to publish an updated dillo-3.0 ebuild via bugs.gentoo.org. > > Is it possible for the ebuild to force fltk-1.3? Yes. This is exactly what I was thinking, but doing something like requires =x11-libs/fltk-1.3* if Gentoo's EBuild versioning system allows it. (I'm guessing FLTK-1.3 updates will progress something like 1.3.0, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, ... until FLTK-1.3 and FLTK-2.0 are combined into FLTK-3.0.) I'm going to be stumped if the EBuild versioning system doesn't allow globbing versions with the equals sign. :-/ > And while we're at >it, you may need to put an explanation about that into the comments >stored in the ebuild log, maybe even an ewarn. Otherwise, people will >be asking on the Gentoo forum about the "downgrade to fltk-1.3" <G>. Some great ideas there. I'm a perfectionist at heart and would likely document comments in both the ebuild and filed bug comments. ;-) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0 is on site for testing!

by waltdnes＠waltdnes.org

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:08:31PM -0800, Roger wrote > Appears to compile & execute fine on i686 Gentoo (Intel P3 2x750). Also on 64-bit Gentoo on an Intel i3. > If nobody else has published a Gentoo EBuild script for packaging, > I'll try to publish an updated dillo-3.0 ebuild via bugs.gentoo.org. Is it possible for the ebuild to force fltk-1.3? And while we're at it, you may need to put an explanation about that into the comments stored in the ebuild log, maybe even an ewarn. Otherwise, people will be asking on the Gentoo forum about the "downgrade to fltk-1.3" <G>. -- Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org>

Sept. 8, 2011

dillo-3.0-rc2 is out

by corvid＠lavabit.com

higuita wrote: > But anyway, as yesterday i tried to bisect the dialog > problem, i tried to do the same for this one... and found that the > problem comes from the fltk... bisect it i found that fltk 1.3 > revision 9023 makes the openning/close of the tabs slower in my > machine. > > here is the 9023 commit: > > $ svn diff -c 9023 > Index: src/fl_arci.cxx > =================================================================== > --- src/fl_arci.cxx (revision 9022) > +++ src/fl_arci.cxx (revision 9023) > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ > if (w <= 0 || h <= 0) return; > > #if defined(USE_X11) > + XDrawArc(fl_display, fl_window, fl_gc, x,y,w-1,h-1, int(a1*64),int((a2-a1)*64)); > XFillArc(fl_display, fl_window, fl_gc, x,y,w-1,h-1, int(a1*64),int((a2-a1)*64)); > #elif defined(WIN32) > if (a1 == a2) return; This is interesting and strange. In our drawArc() code, I have fl_arc(x, y, width, height, angle1, angle2); if (filled) fl_pie(x, y, width, height, angle1, angle2); as a workaround for the problem that they fixed there (that is, instead of doing if (filled) fl_pie(); else fl_arc();). Do pages with lots of circles for unordered list items give you any trouble?

Sept. 8, 2011

ipv6 addresses

by higuita7＠yahoo.co.uk

Hi > Is it possible to specify ipv6 addresses into dillo's address bar? Yes, i use dillo with ipv6 and works fine... for a url with a ipv6 address, you need to do the normal ipv6 trick, enclose it with [], like: http://[2001:200:dff:fff1:216:3eff:feb1:44d7] Of course, this doesnt work right with many sites because they use virtual hosts. example, check this: http://[2001:960:800::2] This is because they require the hostname to know what site to show... but that is a server issue, not a browser problem. good luck higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

Sept. 8, 2011