July 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Tooltips bug

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:27:18PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:22:22PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 05:02:41PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm giving a look into the old dragging-tooltip bug: e.g. show > > > an HTML image's tooltip, then scroll out of it with keyboard or > > > mousewheel, and the tooltip will not be erased. > > > > > > Funny how FltkTooltip::onLeave() is called, but the tooltip > > > window stays anyway. > > > > > > Has anybody looked into this one? > > > > I looked into this a few times. > > When scrolling the moved content just gets copied server side and > > only the newly exposed part is actually drawn. That's how the > > tooltip moves up or down. > > However the disappearing tooltip should request the area to be > > redrawn that it had covered. For some reason it redraws not the > > right rectangle. I think redraws the area where the tooltip had been > > before the scroll or something like that. > > You can see what's going on like this: > > > > diff -r 86cc8fe82da0 dw/fltkviewbase.cc > > --- a/dw/fltkviewbase.ccMon Jun 27 21:01:21 2011 -0400 > > +++ b/dw/fltkviewbase.ccSun Jul 03 21:20:54 2011 +0200 > > @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ > > fl_rectf (X, Y, W, H); > > theLayout->expose (this, &r); > > } > > +fl_color(FL_RED); > > +fl_rect(X, Y, W, H); > > > > exposeArea = NULL; > > } > > Thanks a lot for the tip! > > I've digged into it. Hopefully close enough to a bugfix... Well, it's really complex and I only got partial workarounds with Fl_Tooltip (which "fixed" the problem but creating new ones). Finally I went for a custom tooltip implementation. The patches are commented in the code and in hg (hg log -v). Committed. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 9, 2011

Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:49:33AM -0400, Jimm Katastrophe wrote: >> Could we get a benchmark that compares rendering speeds of web pages, and >> possibly resource usage on top of that as well? I'm just curious to see the >> results :) > >We have http://www.dillo.org/memory.html What about dillo_port1.3? ... not that it'll make much of a difference from version 2? (... guessing, probably wise to wait until Dillo gets it's next release version number with fltk-1.3.)

July 9, 2011

Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:49:33AM -0400, Jimm Katastrophe wrote: > Could we get a benchmark that compares rendering speeds of web pages, and > possibly resource usage on top of that as well? I'm just curious to see the > results :) We have http://www.dillo.org/memory.html Cheers, Johannes

July 8, 2011

Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?

by ircsurfer33＠gmail.com

Could we get a benchmark that compares rendering speeds of web pages, and possibly resource usage on top of that as well? I'm just curious to see the results :)

July 8, 2011

Re: What's pending in dillo-3.0 for a release

by dennisn＠dennisn.dyndns.org

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:37:21 -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi there, > > Fltk-1.3 is out there, and we've worked our pending issues list. > What's still pending? /me hopes the Choice5-popup dialog, regarding unverified certificates, has been fixed. And/or perhaps an option similar to wget's "--no-check-certificate" is implemented :).

July 8, 2011

Latest round of Win32 patches

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 02:04:48 -0400, Roger <rogerx.oss(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On my Gentoo box: > > $ locate cyassl > > Returns a null search here. It sounds binary only or closed source? GPLv2. I think it's a relatively new project; and considering how many distros' repositories *we're* in, I don't think that's the most accurate way to determine a project's license ;-) Their download page doesn't seem to like Dillo, so here's the source for the version I use: http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/deps/cyassl-2.0.0rc1.zip On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:28:51 -0400, Roger <rogerx.oss(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:01:00AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >> polarssl might also be worth looking at. > > Yup, polarssl is included within Gentoo Portage. ( ...and likely the > other > Linux distros.) Unfortunately their build system is badly broken on Windows; neither the included Makefile nor cmake can produce a working library, at least not on my system. I'm not against it, I just wouldn't be able to implement or use it myself. Again, CyaSSL support isn't really for desktop Linux users, since everyone and their brother already includes OpenSSL. But it could be nice for embedded systems that don't need/can't support OpenSSL's additional features or overhead. And of course, it trims bloat on Windows, where we don't really have a sane or consistently available system SSL library. ~Benjamin

July 7, 2011

Latest round of Win32 patches

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:01:00AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:04:48PM -0800, Roger wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:55:13PM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: >> >On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:29:59 -0400, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Benjamin: I'm curious about the addition of CyaSSL support. I don't >> >> know anything about it -- is it useful to you mostly for Windows >> >> reasons, or would it be useful for everyone in the general case? >> >> >> > >> >Useful to everyone, I think. CyaSSL is a cross-platform, embedded SSL >> >library; here's its homepage: >> > http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/Home.html >> > >> >I started using it with the Windows version because it has an >> >OpenSSL-compatible API, and a much smaller footprint -- 1.3 MB with CyaSSL >> >versus 1.7 MB with OpenSSL. (I like that in 2011, Dillo can still fit on >> >a floppy disk!) It's not quite as big a deal on Unix, since most >> >distributions ship with OpenSSL, but I think it fits nicely with Dillo's >> >goal of high software efficiency. >> > >> >The CyaSSL patch actually doesn't change any source code, just some linker >> >flags. On Unix it usually creates its own directory structure, like >> >/usr/local/cyassl, with OpenSSL-compatible symlinks, so even that much >> >isn't necessary. >> >> On my Gentoo box: >> >> $ locate cyassl >> >> Returns a null search here. It sounds binary only or closed source? > >polarssl might also be worth looking at. Yup, polarssl is included within Gentoo Portage. ( ...and likely the other Linux distros.) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

July 7, 2011

Latest round of Win32 patches

by johannes.hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:04:48PM -0800, Roger wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:55:13PM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: > >On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:29:59 -0400, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Benjamin: I'm curious about the addition of CyaSSL support. I don't > >> know anything about it -- is it useful to you mostly for Windows > >> reasons, or would it be useful for everyone in the general case? > >> > > > >Useful to everyone, I think. CyaSSL is a cross-platform, embedded SSL > >library; here's its homepage: > > http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/Home.html > > > >I started using it with the Windows version because it has an > >OpenSSL-compatible API, and a much smaller footprint -- 1.3 MB with CyaSSL > >versus 1.7 MB with OpenSSL. (I like that in 2011, Dillo can still fit on > >a floppy disk!) It's not quite as big a deal on Unix, since most > >distributions ship with OpenSSL, but I think it fits nicely with Dillo's > >goal of high software efficiency. > > > >The CyaSSL patch actually doesn't change any source code, just some linker > >flags. On Unix it usually creates its own directory structure, like > >/usr/local/cyassl, with OpenSSL-compatible symlinks, so even that much > >isn't necessary. > > On my Gentoo box: > > $ locate cyassl > > Returns a null search here. It sounds binary only or closed source? polarssl might also be worth looking at. Cheers, Johannes

July 7, 2011

Latest round of Win32 patches

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:55:13PM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: >On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:29:59 -0400, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > >> >> Benjamin: I'm curious about the addition of CyaSSL support. I don't >> know anything about it -- is it useful to you mostly for Windows >> reasons, or would it be useful for everyone in the general case? >> > >Useful to everyone, I think. CyaSSL is a cross-platform, embedded SSL >library; here's its homepage: > http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/Home.html > >I started using it with the Windows version because it has an >OpenSSL-compatible API, and a much smaller footprint -- 1.3 MB with CyaSSL >versus 1.7 MB with OpenSSL. (I like that in 2011, Dillo can still fit on >a floppy disk!) It's not quite as big a deal on Unix, since most >distributions ship with OpenSSL, but I think it fits nicely with Dillo's >goal of high software efficiency. > >The CyaSSL patch actually doesn't change any source code, just some linker >flags. On Unix it usually creates its own directory structure, like >/usr/local/cyassl, with OpenSSL-compatible symlinks, so even that much >isn't necessary. On my Gentoo box: $ locate cyassl Returns a null search here. It sounds binary only or closed source? -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

July 7, 2011

Latest round of Win32 patches

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:29:59 -0400, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > > Benjamin: I'm curious about the addition of CyaSSL support. I don't > know anything about it -- is it useful to you mostly for Windows > reasons, or would it be useful for everyone in the general case? > Useful to everyone, I think. CyaSSL is a cross-platform, embedded SSL library; here's its homepage: http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/Home.html I started using it with the Windows version because it has an OpenSSL-compatible API, and a much smaller footprint -- 1.3 MB with CyaSSL versus 1.7 MB with OpenSSL. (I like that in 2011, Dillo can still fit on a floppy disk!) It's not quite as big a deal on Unix, since most distributions ship with OpenSSL, but I think it fits nicely with Dillo's goal of high software efficiency. The CyaSSL patch actually doesn't change any source code, just some linker flags. On Unix it usually creates its own directory structure, like /usr/local/cyassl, with OpenSSL-compatible symlinks, so even that much isn't necessary. Cheers, ~Benjamin

July 7, 2011