June 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

What's pending in dillo-3.0 for a release

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, Fltk-1.3 is out there, and we've worked our pending issues list. What's still pending? BTW, I'm working on a focus bug (recently discovered): loading [1], and scrolling down with the down arrow key, makes the rendering area lose focus (taken by the selection list when it becomes visible), and mouse-clicking doesn't recover it. [1] http://www.dillo.org/test/form-select-multiple.html -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 29, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:42:55PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Jorge wrote: > > > After Debian wheezy upgraded to the newest glib (with the > > > polemic optimized memcpy that breaks apps. on amd64 which should > > > have used memmove). I saw the issue! > > > > This memcpy() seems to be a 64-bit-only change, yes? > > AFAIU, yes [1]. > > [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518 I'm on 32-bit, so perhaps it won't be the culprit.

June 28, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:42:55PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > After Debian wheezy upgraded to the newest glib (with the > > polemic optimized memcpy that breaks apps. on amd64 which should > > have used memmove). I saw the issue! > > This memcpy() seems to be a 64-bit-only change, yes? AFAIU, yes [1]. [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518 -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 28, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > After Debian wheezy upgraded to the newest glib (with the > polemic optimized memcpy that breaks apps. on amd64 which should > have used memmove). I saw the issue! This memcpy() seems to be a 64-bit-only change, yes?

June 28, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > Have you found something new on this? Nope.

June 28, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:35:39AM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 08:42:38PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Jorge wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:27:50PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > > > It generally looks like the attached to me. > > > > > > > > PS I just noticed that putting the cursor over the filename bar to > > > > see the tooltip makes it just flash and flash in a cycle. > > > > > > I'm puzzled, never happened to me. I tried to reproduce it > > > with no "luck". > > > > > > Please ask in dillo-dev on whether somebody else sees this bug. > > > > Here's what I was talking about with Jorge: > > http://www.dillo.org/test/download_complete.png > > > > (I haven't seen the strange tooltip behaviour again, though.) > > Finally I saw the behaviour. > > After Debian wheezy upgraded to the newest glib (with the Should have written libc6 (s/glib/libc6). -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 28, 2011

Re: downloads gui appearance

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 08:42:38PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:27:50PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > It generally looks like the attached to me. > > > > > > PS I just noticed that putting the cursor over the filename bar to > > > see the tooltip makes it just flash and flash in a cycle. > > > > I'm puzzled, never happened to me. I tried to reproduce it > > with no "luck". > > > > Please ask in dillo-dev on whether somebody else sees this bug. > > Here's what I was talking about with Jorge: > http://www.dillo.org/test/download_complete.png > > (I haven't seen the strange tooltip behaviour again, though.) Finally I saw the behaviour. After Debian wheezy upgraded to the newest glib (with the polemic optimized memcpy that breaks apps. on amd64 which should have used memmove). I saw the issue! I'll look into it ASAP. Have you found something new on this? -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 28, 2011

FLTK 1.3 and current development version

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Georg Potthast wrote: > Hi List, > > if I use Mercurial to get the latest development version: hg > clone http://hg.dillo.org/dillo dillo > > does that version run with FLTK 1.3 or FLTK 2? If browse the > repository with the web interface I see in the configure.in > file that it still checks for FLTK 2. Yes, it uses FLTK2. Try: http://hg.dillo.org/dillo_port1.3/ for fltk-1.3. (time to start moving the switch to the new branch). -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 28, 2011

FLTK 1.3 and current development version

by mailbox＠georgpotthast.de

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/attachments/20110628/c474985d/attachment.html

June 28, 2011

can't bind action to backslash

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Alexander discovered that binding an action to backslash does not work. I was thinking that the line-continuation code in dGetline came from Tim's work on the parser, but it appears to have been there since the dawn of dillo2. I personally would be tempted to remove the special code for '\' because I'd be surprised if we keep this possibility in mind every time that we use dGetline() somewhere -- and I don't believe it's documented anywhere. But if there's resistance to that, then there are also the options of 1) Making it a line continuation character only if everything following it is whitespace. 2) A special key name for backslash.

June 27, 2011