April 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

1.3 port

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:30:33PM -0800, Roger wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:54:00PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: >>Hi there, >> >> FWIW, I've been using the 1.3 branch for months now with no >>problems (i.e. as stable as 2.0). It's more or less 99% done, >>with some new features (as improved tabs). ! :-) ! >> >> The 1% remaining is the ability to switch panel sizes >>on-the-fly, which could take me 1 day of work aprox. >> >> I'd like to get your feedback on this browser because it will >>sooner than later become the official branch. >> >> Comments? > >Been 1.3 port for the past months as well. > >1) I have "&File" for the "File" button. > >2) On "File > Exit", Dillo prompts with a full size window "Close All Tabs or >Cancel" window. > >I'm guessing, this is because the window has the same name as the main dillo >browser window, as such, DWM thinks this prompt window also needs to be full >sized. Dillo on fltk-2 didn't do this. > >I like the bubble tabs at the top. BTW, almost forgot to mention, I get full GUI flashing when something like news.google.com loads. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

April 17, 2011

Large Panel

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:38:25PM -0800, Roger wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:04:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > >Hi there, > > > > Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? > > > > I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep > >tiny, small and medium. > > mmm... that's why I got a big "&File" button. Usually, I like big fat buttons and > can't stand tiny buttons. (Kiddies usually love the @#$@# tiny buttons along > with all the funky 3D eye candy.) > > Just noticed the small sized buttons are sufficient, even the tiny size is OK > too. > > <shrugs> IIUR, you had a "large" panel because of a lingering dillorc option (because the default is "medium", and you didn't set it). Also, even though you like fat buttons, "large" mode has no much value for you and and you agree to remove it. Did I get you right? -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 17, 2011

Large Panel

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:04:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: >Hi there, > > Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? > > I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep >tiny, small and medium. mmm... that's why I got a big "&File" button. Usually, I like big fat buttons and can't stand tiny buttons. (Kiddies usually love the @#$@# tiny buttons along with all the funky 3D eye candy.) Just noticed the small sized buttons are sufficient, even the tiny size is OK too. <shrugs> -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

April 17, 2011

1.3 port

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:54:00PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: >Hi there, > > FWIW, I've been using the 1.3 branch for months now with no >problems (i.e. as stable as 2.0). It's more or less 99% done, >with some new features (as improved tabs). ! :-) ! > > The 1% remaining is the ability to switch panel sizes >on-the-fly, which could take me 1 day of work aprox. > > I'd like to get your feedback on this browser because it will >sooner than later become the official branch. > > Comments? Been 1.3 port for the past months as well. 1) I have "&File" for the "File" button. 2) On "File > Exit", Dillo prompts with a full size window "Close All Tabs or Cancel" window. I'm guessing, this is because the window has the same name as the main dillo browser window, as such, DWM thinks this prompt window also needs to be full sized. Dillo on fltk-2 didn't do this. I like the bubble tabs at the top. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

April 17, 2011

1.3 port

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, FWIW, I've been using the 1.3 branch for months now with no problems (i.e. as stable as 2.0). It's more or less 99% done, with some new features (as improved tabs). ! :-) ! The 1% remaining is the ability to switch panel sizes on-the-fly, which could take me 1 day of work aprox. I'd like to get your feedback on this browser because it will sooner than later become the official branch. Comments? -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 16, 2011

Large Panel

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:59:03AM -0700, Andrew Harris wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > ?Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? > > > > ?I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep > > tiny, small and medium. > > > Like Rob, I only just now knew about this. I agree with your decision, > if there's only one pulldown menu, why have it on a separate bar? > > Kind of confused as to why it's called "File" though. I realize that's > common for the first pulldown menu to be called 'File', but it doesn't > make a whole lot of sense here. Why not just "Menu" like Opera? Could be. It may be a matter of taste too. IMO, lots of people have the "File" menu hardcoded in their brains. Now, if we manage to make the widget printing feature of fltk-1.3 work in dillo, it could make good sense to add it under a "Menu" label instead of "File". Comments? -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 16, 2011

Large Panel

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:29:36AM -0400, Rob S. wrote: > > > > > > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:04:26 -0300 > > From: jcid(a)dillo.org > > To: dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > > Subject: [Dillo-dev] Large Panel > >? > > Hi there, > >? > > Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? > >? > > I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep > > tiny, small and medium.My apologies for sending that last email to your address, Jorge. ?I am part of another mailing list, where when I hit reply it goes to the list, instead of the sender. ?I should look into changing this somehow with my email, as this is not the first time I have made this mistake. ?Anyway, as to my thoughts on the large panel size... > > I had actually been using the default, and had completely > forgotten that you could change this. ?Now that you brought it > up, I think I will be using the "tiny" setting. ?Long story > short, you would have no objection from me if you got rid of > the large setting. Thanks for the feedback. BTW, I just committed a couple of fixes for tiny and large in the 1.3 branch. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 16, 2011

Linked image borders.

by mr_semantics＠hotmail.com

On this page,?http://www3.sympatico.ca/rsquared/gdb/, there are two images at the bottom which link to the W3C HTML and CSS validation pages. ?The inline style for the images is as follows: style="border:0;width:88px;height:31px" On every browser I have used, including Dillo 2.2, the blue link box around the images has not been displayed. ?Under the Dillo FLTK 1.3 port, it shows them. ?My question is, why? ?Which is the correct behaviour? Rob

April 16, 2011

Large Panel

by tuna＠supertunaman.com

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > Hi there, > > ?Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? > > ?I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep > tiny, small and medium. > Like Rob, I only just now knew about this. I agree with your decision, if there's only one pulldown menu, why have it on a separate bar? Kind of confused as to why it's called "File" though. I realize that's common for the first pulldown menu to be called 'File', but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense here. Why not just "Menu" like Opera? > -- > ?Cheers > ?Jorge.- > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

April 16, 2011

HTML5

by mr_semantics＠hotmail.com

> From: mr_semantics(a)hotmail.com > To: dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:09:39 -0400 > Subject: [Dillo-dev] HTML5 > > > Hello all, > Forgive me if this has been discussed before (I do not recall seeing it since I have been following the mailing list). I recently started experimenting with some HTML5 stuff on a page I maintain, and as expected, dillo indicated an error in the html source. You can see the page here: > http://www3.sympatico.ca/rsquared/gdb/ > The error is: "HTML warning: line 2, the required DOCTYPE declaration is missing (or invalid)" > Now this does not surprise me at all, as I presume dillo is not expecting the new doctype declaration. Anyway, I thought I might raise this issue, and see what sort of mind the devs have about implementing HTML5 in dillo. Of course, I realise you fellows are probably up to your ears in the FLTK 1.3 port, but I thought this might make for an interesting discussion, if nothing else. To start off, I suppose the danger in implementing any of the new html stuff is that it is not standardised at all yet. See here for more: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5#W3C_standardization_process > I guess the worry is that it could possibly be a bit of a moving target. > Rob Blast it! I just figured out how to build the new 1.3 port, and realised that you fellows have at least addressed the HTML5 issue in part. ? As an aside, with the new browser brings a different issue, which I will address a little later in a different thread.

April 16, 2011