December 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

release candidate for dillo-3.0.2

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

corvid wrote: > > I just put up an rc at > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > > $ sha1sum dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > 1d1258ee7d18c8ca0eabaf100f2f611c6be03f87 dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 Works well here (Linux-3.1.0). Regards, Jeremy Henty

Dec. 2, 2011

release candidate for dillo-3.0.2

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:18:53AM +0000, corvid wrote: > >I just put up an rc at >http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > >$ sha1sum dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 >1d1258ee7d18c8ca0eabaf100f2f611c6be03f87 dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > >Please test :) > >If all goes well, the idea is to release on Monday... Compiles and executes fine here on P3 x86. No problems yet veiwing pages. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Dec. 1, 2011

release candidate for dillo-3.0.2

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I just put up an rc at http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 $ sha1sum dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 1d1258ee7d18c8ca0eabaf100f2f611c6be03f87 dillo-3.0.2-rc1.tar.bz2 Please test :) If all goes well, the idea is to release on Monday...

Dec. 1, 2011

keysrc and prefix keys

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

I was thinking of implementing more of Firefox's key shortcuts in Dillo, namely Alt-<n> -> "Go to nth tab" for <n> = 1, 2, 3, ... 8 and Alt-9 -> "Go to last tab". (That last one would be really useful when I have more tabs open than will fit in the tab bar.) But then I thought "how do we configure this in keysrc?". The obvious solution is to add separate entries for each of the 9 commands. But this is clearly silly because no-one wants to use, say, Alt as the prefix for going to the 4th tab but Ctrl-Shift as the prefix for going to the 5th tab. Why should users have to add 9 entries to keysrc just because they prefer Ctrl-Shift to Alt? So I think we really want a single keyssrc entry that defines the modifier keys that bind the 1, 2, 3, ... 9 keys to the "Go to tab" commands. But this would significantly complicate the current code. Is it worth it? Regards, Jeremy Henty

Dec. 1, 2011