February 2010 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

dillo-2.2-rc1

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:11:38PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 02:34:37AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > As you may have already noticed, we're at RC1 for the next release. > > Johannes has built a tarball: > > > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > > SHA1: 146216a1541b20a3e042c62c0db8ee42f173ed01 > > > > Please test! > > Ok, for now we know about the TCP blackhole issue reported by bf. > > Any other issues or success stories maybe? Fix for a compilation warning: diff -pru /home/jcid/C/Dillo/d2/dillo/dpid/dpidc.c dillo-2.2-rc1/dpid/dpidc.c --- /home/jcid/C/Dillo/d2/dillo/dpid/dpidc.c 2010-01-25 11:28:59.000000000 -0300 +++ dillo-2.2-rc1/dpid/dpidc.c 2010-02-01 14:25:01.000000000 -0300 @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "chat") == 0) { printf("Please enter the message: "); bzero(buffer,256); - fgets(buffer,255,stdin); + if (fgets(buffer,255,stdin) == NULL) + MSG_ERR("dpidc: Can't read the message\n"); } else { MSG_ERR("main: Unknown operation '%s'\n", argv[1]); print_usage(argv[0]); Everything else seems OK so far. I'm expecting feedback from "bf". -- Cheers Jorge.-

Feb. 2, 2010

Starting dpis on FreeBSD: blackhole(4) timeouts

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 04:44:57PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 07:02:54PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > bf wrote: > > > Because blackhole(4) is a common security measure, and because this > > > problem did not exist under the previous dpi framework, it must be > > > considered a regression, even if, in hindsight, it is to be "expected". > > > > I finally looked back to refresh my memory on why we switched to inet > > sockets: Minix. If we do return to Unix sockets eventually, what is the > > thinking on what we would do for Minix? > > At some point in time Minix 3 will have to implement UDS. > In the meanwhile they can use the version with inet sockets. What shall we do about this TCP blackhole issue? Should we try to switch back to UDS before release? Cheers, Johannes

Feb. 2, 2010

dillo-2.2-rc1

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 02:34:37AM +0000, corvid wrote: > As you may have already noticed, we're at RC1 for the next release. > Johannes has built a tarball: > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2-rc1.tar.bz2 > SHA1: 146216a1541b20a3e042c62c0db8ee42f173ed01 > > Please test! Ok, for now we know about the TCP blackhole issue reported by bf. Any other issues or success stories maybe? Please keep testing. Cheers, Johannes

Feb. 2, 2010