September 2008 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Icon for Dillo window

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, I was thinking it'd be good to provide an icon for the WM to use. Does anybody know how to do it with FLTK2? -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 25, 2008

release packaging

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:16:22PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > OK, dw2 is now inside the dillo2 tree. > > CVS updated and also the directions in cvs.html. > > Please check and test. It works fine! Jeremy Henty

Sept. 25, 2008

release packaging

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:16:22PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:44:51PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:11:03PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > > > > > > > Currently you need to download three tarballs to compile dillo > > > > > (fltk,dw,dillo). I doubt that any linux distribution has fltk2 > > > > > packages at the moment. (and also not openembedded) What's the plan > > > > > about that? > > > > > > > > FLTK2's API is still not frozen, and its ABI does change quite often > > > > so we will have to supply the tarball ourselves. It would be simplest > > > > just to keep a copy of the right FLTK2 snapshot on the dillo site > > > > under a link saying "use *this* version". The problem is not that > > > > distros won't supply packages, the problem is that they *will* and it > > > > might be the wrong version. (Expect "I upgraded FLTK2 and Dillo > > > > crashed" reports!) > > > > > > > > The dw package is an awkward case. I think we should bite the bullet > > > > and either move it inside dillo2 or make it an independent package > > > > that the user installs and have dillo2 find and use the installed dw > > > > (and lose the dw-testbed symbolic link). > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > I'd move dw2 inside dillo2's tree (as it was before), > > > and have a recommended FLTK2 tarball in our site. > > > > That sounds good! > > OK, dw2 is now inside the dillo2 tree. > > CVS updated and also the directions in cvs.html. > > Please check and test. Yes, it works fine! Cheers, Johannes

Sept. 24, 2008

Who among you values standard_widget_colors? (was Re: [Dillo-dev] cut off word ends with italic fonts)

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jeremy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:16:16PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:18:02PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > > > I've been surfing with the default so I just tried switching to > > > standard_widget_colors=YES and... I don't see much difference. > > > What does it affect? So far I'm indifferent to it. > > > > Check the form inputs at the top of www.freshmeat.net for example. > > They should have the current background color with > > standard_widget_colors=NO. > > OK, I see. In this case I slightly prefer standard_widget_colors=YES, > but I wouldn't make a fuss about it. So, I am still pretty > indifferent at the moment. Are we proposing to remove this > preferences option? What behaviour will we get if we do? I was trying to speak neutrally so that no one would feel like they're standing in the way of anything if they prefer it. (Don't want to take care of code if it isn't being used.) So, all right, I have nothing to propose, then. [off topic: I realized yesterday that, in my mind, dillo has a three-dimensional shape. I think part of that comes from where different files appear when src/ is ls'ed. Weird.]

Sept. 24, 2008

Who among you values standard_widget_colors? (was Re: [Dillo-dev] cut off word ends with italic fonts)

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:16:16PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:18:02PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > I've been surfing with the default so I just tried switching to > > standard_widget_colors=YES and... I don't see much difference. > > What does it affect? So far I'm indifferent to it. > > Check the form inputs at the top of www.freshmeat.net for example. > They should have the current background color with > standard_widget_colors=NO. OK, I see. In this case I slightly prefer standard_widget_colors=YES, but I wouldn't make a fuss about it. So, I am still pretty indifferent at the moment. Are we proposing to remove this preferences option? What behaviour will we get if we do? Regards, Jeremy Henty

Sept. 24, 2008

release packaging

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:44:51PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:11:03PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > > > > > Currently you need to download three tarballs to compile dillo > > > > (fltk,dw,dillo). I doubt that any linux distribution has fltk2 > > > > packages at the moment. (and also not openembedded) What's the plan > > > > about that? > > > > > > FLTK2's API is still not frozen, and its ABI does change quite often > > > so we will have to supply the tarball ourselves. It would be simplest > > > just to keep a copy of the right FLTK2 snapshot on the dillo site > > > under a link saying "use *this* version". The problem is not that > > > distros won't supply packages, the problem is that they *will* and it > > > might be the wrong version. (Expect "I upgraded FLTK2 and Dillo > > > crashed" reports!) > > > > > > The dw package is an awkward case. I think we should bite the bullet > > > and either move it inside dillo2 or make it an independent package > > > that the user installs and have dillo2 find and use the installed dw > > > (and lose the dw-testbed symbolic link). > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > I'd move dw2 inside dillo2's tree (as it was before), > > and have a recommended FLTK2 tarball in our site. > > That sounds good! OK, dw2 is now inside the dillo2 tree. CVS updated and also the directions in cvs.html. Please check and test. If it works you can get rid of the old dw2, dw2-cur directories and the dw-testbed symbolic link. (It worked here). -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 24, 2008

Who among you values standard_widget_colors? (was Re: [Dillo-dev] cut off word ends with italic fonts)

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:18:02PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > I'm running with standard_widget_colors=NO all the time and like it. > > I've been surfing with the default so I just tried switching to > standard_widget_colors=YES and... I don't see much difference. What > does it affect? So far I'm indifferent to it. > Check the form inputs at the top of www.freshmeat.net for example. They should have the current background color with standard_widget_colors=NO. Regards, Johannes

Sept. 24, 2008

Who among you values standard_widget_colors? (was Re: [Dillo-dev] cut off word ends with italic fonts)

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > I'm running with standard_widget_colors=NO all the time and like it. I've been surfing with the default so I just tried switching to standard_widget_colors=YES and... I don't see much difference. What does it affect? So far I'm indifferent to it. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Sept. 24, 2008

release packaging

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:11:03PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > > > Currently you need to download three tarballs to compile dillo > > > (fltk,dw,dillo). I doubt that any linux distribution has fltk2 > > > packages at the moment. (and also not openembedded) What's the plan > > > about that? > > > > FLTK2's API is still not frozen, and its ABI does change quite often > > so we will have to supply the tarball ourselves. It would be simplest > > just to keep a copy of the right FLTK2 snapshot on the dillo site > > under a link saying "use *this* version". The problem is not that > > distros won't supply packages, the problem is that they *will* and it > > might be the wrong version. (Expect "I upgraded FLTK2 and Dillo > > crashed" reports!) > > > > The dw package is an awkward case. I think we should bite the bullet > > and either move it inside dillo2 or make it an independent package > > that the user installs and have dillo2 find and use the installed dw > > (and lose the dw-testbed symbolic link). > > > > Thoughts? > > I'd move dw2 inside dillo2's tree (as it was before), > and have a recommended FLTK2 tarball in our site. That sounds good! Cheers, Johannes

Sept. 24, 2008

Who among you values standard_widget_colors? (was Re: [Dillo-dev] cut off word ends with italic fonts)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:17:28PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Jorge encouraged me to add that preference in case anyone wanted it > > back when the, ahh, 'nonstandard' widget colors came along some months ago, > > but I have no idea whether anyone uses it. > > I'm running with standard_widget_colors=NO all the time and like it. Me too! -- Cheers Jorge.-

Sept. 24, 2008