November 2008 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Q: Thoughts on a user/password dialog for an HTTP AUTH dpi?

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

I'm implementing an HTTP AUTH dpi (based on the cookies dpi) and I'd appreciate comments on how I'm doing it. (Motivation: (a) I'm tired of the irony of having to use Firefox to log on to the FLTK Trac Wiki to update the Dillo page, (b) this will be a useful primer for hacking on the https dpi.) The problem is that the dpi must prompt the user for a username and password but src/dialog.cc only supports dialogs that present a choice of buttons. I think I'll have to add a_Dialog_user_passwd() to src/dialog.cc to create a modal dialog, return the clicked button and write the contents of the dialog entries into a struct. Then I can add a wrapper for it to src/dpiapi.c and hook it into a_Capi_ccc(). That will let the dpi query the user. Is this a good way to do it or is there a smarter way? All comments and advice are welcome. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 20, 2008

a list of what dillo2 runs on

by ljmoore＠wightman.ca

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:52:43PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Christopher Illies wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:14:34PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > I wonder whether we could get someone for each system who > > > would have the responsibility (or, let's say "_glory_" :) > > > of responding to "Hey, we changed [some configuration stuff] > > > in the latest CVS. Does it work fine on your system?" messages. > > > > I can take that part for FreeBSD for now and will respond when such > > messages are posted to this list. Also, I can do a fresh compile every > > two weeks or so. > > Cool! > > My system isn't representative of any mainstream (debian on a m68k ) but will download from cvs, compile and soforth when prompted. > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev -- People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. Isaac Asimov

Nov. 20, 2008

Feature Request

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:32:13AM -0500, me at swva wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:21:17PM -0500, me at swva wrote: >>>> >>>> The URL viewer is taken from .mailcap. When set properly, it >>>> works (at least here it works with Ubuntu 8.04.1, so it's not an >>>> alpine issue). >>> >>> OK, good; but you're over my head. I don't find anything named >>> .mailcap on my machine. Neither does my search function. >>> >>> Since I've been running Pine for years, I have a .pinerc rather >>> than an .alpinerc; but I don't find anything like what you say there, >>> either. >> >> You can create it in your home account. >> >> nano -w ~/.mailcap >> >> then put the long line there, and see what happens. > > I did, and it didn't; but I may have the long line wrong, since it's > formatted into two here. I tried it (on my own machine here, not the > remote one yet) both with and without a space between the backslash and > "test=test" (having done c&p on the two pieces). Are there really > supposed to be two spaces between the last semicolon and "nametemplate"? The backslash doesn't go in the line. It's a convention to mark a single line when split in two. The .mailcap should go in the same machine where alpine runs. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Nov. 18, 2008

Feature Request

by Beartooth＠swva.net

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:21:17PM -0500, me at swva wrote: >>> >>> The URL viewer is taken from .mailcap. When set properly, it >>> works (at least here it works with Ubuntu 8.04.1, so it's not an >>> alpine issue). >> >> OK, good; but you're over my head. I don't find anything >> named .mailcap on my machine. Neither does my search function. >> >> Since I've been running Pine for years, I have a .pinerc >> rather than an .alpinerc; but I don't find anything like what you >> say there, either. > > You can create it in your home account. > > nano -w ~/.mailcap > > then put the long line there, and see what happens. I did, and it didn't; but I may have the long line wrong, since it's formatted into two here. I tried it (on my own machine here, not the remote one yet) both with and without a space between the backslash and "test=test" (having done c&p on the two pieces). Are there really supposed to be two spaces between the last semicolon and "nametemplate"? >>> If you have something like this in your mailcap: >>> (all in one line) >>> >>> text/html; /usr/local/bin/dillo -l -f '%s'; description=HTML Text; \ >>> test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html >>> >>> it works with dillo1. >> >> About now, I should probably mention that I do my email >> different ways from different addresses. The main one is remote. >> It does open links that include "http://" -- in dillo *here*, not >> on the remote machine -- but not ones without. The same is also >> true when I run Alpine against the address I'm using at this >> moment. > > Probably you use something like: > > ssh -X <remote_machine> > > it should work OK. > I'll try that next. >>> Something like: >>> >>> text/html; /usr/local/bin/dillo -l -f -x XID '%s'; description=HTML Text; \ >>> test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html >> >> I'm guessing that I should c&p that into my .pinerc >> somewhere, or into the interface Alpine gives me by typing M > S >> > C (Main menu to Setup to Configure); but I don't know where. [....] >> Now you're way to Helen Gone over my head. Sorry. > > Never mind, just try the .mailcap suggestion above. -- Beartooth Oldfart, Double Retiree, Neo-Redneck, Linux Convert Remember, I have precious little idea what I am talking about.

Nov. 18, 2008

Feature Request

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:21:17PM -0500, me at swva wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > [...] >> I ended installing alpine here to check this issue. >> >> The URL viewer is taken from .mailcap. When set properly, it >> works (at least here it works with Ubuntu 8.04.1, so it's not an >> alpine issue). > > OK, good; but you're over my head. I don't find anything > named .mailcap on my machine. Neither does my search function. > > Since I've been running Pine for years, I have a .pinerc > rather than an .alpinerc; but I don't find anything like what > you say there, either. You can create it in your home account. nano -w ~/.mailcap then put the long line there, and see what happens. >> If you have something like this in your mailcap: >> (all in one line) >> >> text/html; /usr/local/bin/dillo -l -f '%s'; description=HTML Text; \ >> test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html >> >> it works with dillo1. > > About now, I should probably mention that I do my email different ways > from different addresses. The main one is remote. It does open links that > include "http://" -- in dillo *here*, not on the remote machine -- but > not ones without. The same is also true when I run Alpine against the > address I'm using at this moment. Probably you use something like: ssh -X <remote_machine> it should work OK. >> Something like: >> >> text/html; /usr/local/bin/dillo -l -f -x XID '%s'; description=HTML Text; \ >> test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html > > I'm guessing that I should c&p that into my .pinerc somewhere, or into > the interface Alpine gives me by typing M > S > C (Main menu to Setup to > Configure); but I don't know where. > >> makes dillo1 exit, so it doesn't work. >> Reason: XID should be a number containing a window ID, where dillo should >> embed itself, not a literal string! > > Now you're way to Helen Gone over my head. Sorry. Never mind, just try the .mailcap suggestion above. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Nov. 18, 2008

RE: what dillo2 runs on.

by CHalbersma.12＠westminster-mo.edu

I've been able to get dillo2 to compile and run on a Damn Small Linux box. Obviously you need to compile fltk2 first but dillo2 seems to run although it does have some troubles. As soon as I find them I hope to be able to post a DSL package. CRH On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:24:21AM +0000, corvid wrote: > I want to get the status of everything in order to update > http://www.dillo.org/Compatibility.html for dillo2. > > Linux x86 - works > DragonFlyBSD - works > > Linux x86-64 - Justus was and is making snapshots, but I don't know whether > he uses them much. > Solaris 10 - Justus reported that it was running, but I believe it was just > a quick test. > OSX - Jorge reports that it works but is currently flaky. > > *BSD - Some of the mailing list traffic in October was devoted to getting > them working. Presumably it would have been mentioned here if they > had stopped working since, but... > > other - no idea. > > Looking back at what I just wrote, let me clarify that I meant that > dillo2-on-osx is flaky, not that Jorge is flaky :) > Debian Linux m68k works (cvs 14 Nov 2008) -- Qne's mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions. -Oliver Wendell Holmes

Nov. 17, 2008

a list of what dillo2 runs on

by hparad＠web.de

hi tested dillo 2.0 on debian-arm on Linksys Nslu2 (without ssl) there is also a debian_arm package based on the sources from Andreas with some changes at http://hparadies.homepage.t-online.de/ Gruss Holger

Nov. 17, 2008

a list of what dillo2 runs on

by james＠bsdgroup.org

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 09:30:48PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 09:23:56AM -0800, bf wrote: > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> wrote: > > > > > From: Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> > > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] a list of what dillo2 runs on > > > To: dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > > > Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 7:27 AM > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:24:21AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > I want to get the status of everything in order to > > > update > > > > http://www.dillo.org/Compatibility.html for dillo2. > > > > > > > > Linux x86 - works > > > > DragonFlyBSD - works > > > > > > > > Linux x86-64 - Justus was and is making snapshots, but > > > I don't know whether > > > > he uses them much. > > > > Solaris 10 - Justus reported that it was running, but > > > I believe it was just > > > > a quick test. > > > > OSX - Jorge reports that it works but is currently > > > flaky. > > > > > > > > *BSD - Some of the mailing list traffic in October was > > > devoted to getting > > > > them working. Presumably it would have been > > > mentioned here if they > > > > had stopped working since, but... > > > > > > > > Both the release tarball and recent CVS snapshots build and run without any > > apparent problems on FreeBSD 7-STABLE i386 (and probably other versions as > > well ... ). The new dillo will be included in FreeBSD Ports soon: it has > > been delayed owing to the Ports freeze before the release of FreeBSD > > 6.4/7.1, and to some confusion among Ports maintainers about who was going > > to be responsible for it. You can find a proposed Port at: > > > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128139 > > > > Presumably NetBSD will put it in pkgsrc soon: > > > > http://pkgsrc.se/wip/dillo2 > > It's in cvs already: > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/www/dillo/Makefile > > Cheers, > Johannes OpenBSD also has the new dillo in it's ports tree along with fltk2. -- James Turner BSD Group Consulting http://www.bsdgroup.org

Nov. 16, 2008

a list of what dillo2 runs on

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 09:23:56AM -0800, bf wrote: > > > > --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> wrote: > > > From: Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> > > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] a list of what dillo2 runs on > > To: dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > > Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 7:27 AM > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:24:21AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > I want to get the status of everything in order to > > update > > > http://www.dillo.org/Compatibility.html for dillo2. > > > > > > Linux x86 - works > > > DragonFlyBSD - works > > > > > > Linux x86-64 - Justus was and is making snapshots, but > > I don't know whether > > > he uses them much. > > > Solaris 10 - Justus reported that it was running, but > > I believe it was just > > > a quick test. > > > OSX - Jorge reports that it works but is currently > > flaky. > > > > > > *BSD - Some of the mailing list traffic in October was > > devoted to getting > > > them working. Presumably it would have been > > mentioned here if they > > > had stopped working since, but... > > > > > Both the release tarball and recent CVS snapshots build and run without any > apparent problems on FreeBSD 7-STABLE i386 (and probably other versions as > well ... ). The new dillo will be included in FreeBSD Ports soon: it has > been delayed owing to the Ports freeze before the release of FreeBSD > 6.4/7.1, and to some confusion among Ports maintainers about who was going > to be responsible for it. You can find a proposed Port at: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128139 > > Presumably NetBSD will put it in pkgsrc soon: > > http://pkgsrc.se/wip/dillo2 It's in cvs already: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/www/dillo/Makefile Cheers, Johannes

Nov. 16, 2008

a list of what dillo2 runs on

by bf2006a＠yahoo.com

--- On Sun, 11/16/08, Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> wrote: > From: Larry Moore <ljmoore(a)wightman.ca> > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] a list of what dillo2 runs on > To: dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 7:27 AM > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:24:21AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > I want to get the status of everything in order to > update > > http://www.dillo.org/Compatibility.html for dillo2. > > > > Linux x86 - works > > DragonFlyBSD - works > > > > Linux x86-64 - Justus was and is making snapshots, but > I don't know whether > > he uses them much. > > Solaris 10 - Justus reported that it was running, but > I believe it was just > > a quick test. > > OSX - Jorge reports that it works but is currently > flaky. > > > > *BSD - Some of the mailing list traffic in October was > devoted to getting > > them working. Presumably it would have been > mentioned here if they > > had stopped working since, but... > > Both the release tarball and recent CVS snapshots build and run without any apparent problems on FreeBSD 7-STABLE i386 (and probably other versions as well ... ). The new dillo will be included in FreeBSD Ports soon: it has been delayed owing to the Ports freeze before the release of FreeBSD 6.4/7.1, and to some confusion among Ports maintainers about who was going to be responsible for it. You can find a proposed Port at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128139 Presumably NetBSD will put it in pkgsrc soon: http://pkgsrc.se/wip/dillo2 so that it will be available there and on DragonFlyBSD. Ditto for OpenBSD: http://www.mail-archive.com/ports@openbsd.org/msg19098.html (follow-up messages include a patch for machines without ipv6 that you may want to consider) but as they have fewer resources and are cautious about adopting software, it may be a bit longer. Regards, b.

Nov. 16, 2008