May 2006 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.8.6.tar.bz2 is out!!!

by higuita

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:49:11 -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > Looks like you are compiling against FLTK1. Dillo uses FLTK2. (...) > fltk-config --version if returns 2.0.0... i have fltk-config in /usr/bin (2.0.0) and in /usr/local/bin (1.1.7) i use 1.1.7 for another program if i remove the 1.x fltk libs from /usr/local/lib i was able to compile and use dillo... but this requires hand tune for compiling each program is there any better way? probably this will disappear when FLTK 2.x is really released and programs use -lfltk2 instead of -lfltk >PS: You could have trimmed the log... err... sorry, i didnt realize that xterm buffer was really that big (in length and size) -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

May 2, 2006

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.8.6.tar.bz2 is out!!!

by Globe Trotter

--- Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > On Sunday 30 April 2006 1:26 pm, Globe Trotter wrote: > > I downloaded and installed your Fedora 5 RPM. When I click on bookmark, I > > get nowhere. There is an error about libssl.so.5 not found? Or something > > like that. > > How did you get this to work on FC5? > > Um... I installed it? Really, nothing special beyond that. > > The libssl issue points to the probable reason: I would guess you installed > the Fedora Core 4 RPM instead of the FC5 RPM. The RPM for FC5 is linked > against libssl.so.6, not libssl.so.5. The FC4 RPM, however, is linked to > libssl.so.5. > > Make sure you grabbed dillo-0.8.6-1.fc5.i386.rpm, and try reinstalling the > RPM. Just in case, see if an old dpid process is running and kill it. > > Oh, and there's no need to install the openssl-devel package. > The /lib/libssl.so files are in the openssl package. > > (Even so, I wouldn't expect this to be an issue except with HTTPS links, and > the RPM is built as plain-vanilla as possible -- which means the SSL support > is actually disabled. Does dpid try to load all the DPIs when it's first > called?) > > -- > Kelson Vibber > www.hyperborea.org > Hi Kelson, Thanks! I did install dillo-0.8.6-1.fc5.i386.rpm and just to be clear, I removed the old dillo. And it works, well, sort of. Is it possible to increase the font in this new dillo? I will report better after using it some more. best wishes, trotter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

May 1, 2006

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.8.6.tar.bz2 is out!!!

by Kelson Vibber

On Sunday 30 April 2006 1:26 pm, Globe Trotter wrote: > I downloaded and installed your Fedora 5 RPM. When I click on bookmark, I > get nowhere. There is an error about libssl.so.5 not found? Or something > like that. > How did you get this to work on FC5? Um... I installed it? Really, nothing special beyond that. The libssl issue points to the probable reason: I would guess you installed the Fedora Core 4 RPM instead of the FC5 RPM. The RPM for FC5 is linked against libssl.so.6, not libssl.so.5. The FC4 RPM, however, is linked to libssl.so.5. Make sure you grabbed dillo-0.8.6-1.fc5.i386.rpm, and try reinstalling the RPM. Just in case, see if an old dpid process is running and kill it. Oh, and there's no need to install the openssl-devel package. The /lib/libssl.so files are in the openssl package. (Even so, I wouldn't expect this to be an issue except with HTTPS links, and the RPM is built as plain-vanilla as possible -- which means the SSL support is actually disabled. Does dpid try to load all the DPIs when it's first called?) -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

May 1, 2006