May 2004 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2 on ps2

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sun, 2 May 2004, robert w hall wrote: > In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405012200030.1900(a)infinity.cl>, Jorge > Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> writes > > > > Yes, but the tarball is recommended because it tests the "configure" > >script (otherwise it is generated by the local auto* tools). > > > on playstation2-linux, tarball compiles and runs OK (socklen_t test went > by without demur) > (- still can't get the default installation to do downloads properly > (dpid starts, but I get messages about 'unhandled MIME types on bz2 > files...) - but this may well be finger trouble on my part.) When you left-click a link, the remote resource is requested for viewing; that's why dillo complains about an unhandled MIME type (it can't display it). If you choose "Save Link As..." from the link menu, the URL will be passed to the downloads dpi and retrieved and saves as a local file. Cheers Jorge.-

May 3, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK FLTK and other Render

by 阿贵

Hi, If you want a browser in FB/DirectFB, try <b>links</b>: http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~clock/twibright/links/download.html Hope this might help regards Hansom Young shuishuila wrote: >Hi, dillo-dev， > > I want to port dillo to set-top box as menu(OSD). But it don't have >X11,GTK. How many work need to do if I have to write widget myself? > > I think it's a pity that dillo combine tightly with glib/gtk, so it >is hard to port to X,FrameBuffer,DirectFB etc. > > If dillo have it's own widget and event handle, it is a excellent >broswer for embedded system. > >Regards, >　　　　　　　　shuishuila >　　　　　　　　shuishuila(a)hotmail.com >　　　　　　　　　　2004-04-30 > > > >

May 3, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2

by Riccardo Mottola

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > The "pre1" tarball can be found at: > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2 > > When testing it, please pay special attention to the new > detection routine for socklen_t (at ./configure time), and give > the downloads server a hard test. I'm testing the pre on solaris 2.6. on Solaris 2.6 it says "int" > Feedback is very important now, because I want to remove the > "alpha software" label from dillo and name it as stable (beta). I was visiting osnews.com which I regularly visit with dillo 0.80. Using pre 0.8.1 I saw the first two text boxes render and then all stopped. The console said: Dns_server [1]: www.newmobilecomputing.com is 112488 Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 8039 error_code 8 request_code 72 minor_code 0 visiting my own website at http://carduus.chanet.de yields the same problem, the first text lines appear and then: Dns_server [0]: carduus.chanet.de is 112598 Connecting to 217.110.112.61 Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 4012 error_code 8 request_code 72 minor_code 0 Unfortunatly, I installed the new dillo over the old one so I cannot test the old anzmroe, but I bet it wasn't so bad. Now I can't visit any site at all basically. I will test other platforms. -Riccardo

May 3, 2004

Re: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK FLTK and other Render

by shuishuila

Hi,Jorge, Thank you for your reply. FLTK need X, so I need to port microwindows at least. Why no let dillo's render engine more scalable? And I think that few desktop system have FLTK. Regards, shuishuila(a)hotmail.com 　　　　　　　　　　2004-05-03 ======= 2004-05-02 10:41:00 You Wrote：======= >On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, shuishuila wrote: > >> Hi, dillo-dev， > > Hi. > >> >> I want to port dillo to set-top box as menu(OSD). But it don't have >> X11,GTK. How many work need to do if I have to write widget myself? > > That's a lot of work, but... > >> >> I think it's a pity that dillo combine tightly with glib/gtk, so it >> is hard to port to X,FrameBuffer,DirectFB etc. >> >> If dillo have it's own widget and event handle, it is a excellent >> broswer for embedded system. > > We're almost done with a plan to port Dillo to FLTK. > > You can read about it in our mailing list archives. Start here: > > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2004-April/001882.html > > > If you have FLTK knowledge and are willing to help us doing the >port it'd be great. > > Cheers > Jorge.- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

May 3, 2004

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2 on ps2

by robert w hall

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405012200030.1900(a)infinity.cl>, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> writes > > Yes, but the tarball is recommended because it tests the "configure" >script (otherwise it is generated by the local auto* tools). > on playstation2-linux, tarball compiles and runs OK (socklen_t test went by without demur) (- still can't get the default installation to do downloads properly (dpid starts, but I get messages about 'unhandled MIME types on bz2 files...) - but this may well be finger trouble on my part.) >>FAIK, you'll have to! (do the test). > > As for the kids, no problem, it could be tomorrow too :-) > the sun came out so they're down the skate-park... :-) -- robert w hall

May 2, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sat, 1 May 2004, robert w hall wrote: > In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405011313350.1900(a)infinity.cl>, Jorge > Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> writes > > > > Feedback is very important now, because I want to remove the > >"alpha software" label from dillo and name it as stable (beta). > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > Jorge.- > > > > > 1) Is this also current cvs? Yes, but the tarball is recommended because it tests the "configure" script (otherwise it is generated by the local auto* tools). > 2) Is anyone else going to test on a playstation-2 - or do I have to > boot the kids off the machine on a British (wet!) bank-holiday! AFAIK, you'll have to! (do the test). As for the kids, no problem, it could be tomorrow too :-) Cheers Jorge.-

May 2, 2004

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi there, It took a long time to prepare the pre1 tarball for the next release. Mainly because complex problems were discovered in the last minute. For instance, a race condition in the dpi chain that produced segfaults (it took three days to find and fix), and several problems with the downloads server (it had troubles when saving unnamed pages as "index.html" when the file already existed, it was also not renaming those pages, etc). The "pre1" tarball can be found at: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2 When testing it, please pay special attention to the new detection routine for socklen_t (at ./configure time), and give the downloads server a hard test. Feedback is very important now, because I want to remove the "alpha software" label from dillo and name it as stable (beta). Thanks in advance Jorge.-

May 1, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.1-pre1.tar.bz2

by robert w hall

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405011313350.1900(a)infinity.cl>, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> writes > > Feedback is very important now, because I want to remove the >"alpha software" label from dillo and name it as stable (beta). > > > Thanks in advance > Jorge.- > > 1) Is this also current cvs? 2) Is anyone else going to test on a playstation-2 - or do I have to boot the kids off the machine on a British (wet!) bank-holiday! -- robert w hall

May 1, 2004

[Dillo-dev]is anyone planning to add SpiderMonkey (JavaScript-C) Engine to Dillo?

by Miernik

Is any work going on to add SpiderMonkey (JavaScript-C) Engine to Dillo? http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/ I once saw a post of somebody who planned to do something like that, but heard of no progress later. I would be very interested in such implementation. -- Miernik _________________________ xmpp:miernik@amessage.info ___________________/__ tel: +48888299997 __/ mailto:miernik@ctnet.pl http://www.miernik.ctnet.pl/

May 1, 2004

[Dillo-dev]dillo interface and motif, athena etc

by Riccardo Mottola

Hello. I have never looked at dillo's source code directly, so I am asking some general questions here I have always liked dillo's speed and use of system resources because it brings back the fun of browsing and works on older workstations too, as every browser should. But I never liked dillo's interface too much. I'd like to make it a proper interface, more like other browsers have, taking inspiration for example from Mosaic's bar and bookmarks, from chimera's simplicity, from HotJava cutsomization, etc. Also, I dislike GTK: they are slow and don't work well on 256 color screens. I would use Motif for writing the interface with having an eye on LessTif of course. Motif/Lesstif is extremely fast and works like a charm on my old 20Mhz IBM RS6k witha 256 color card. Also, most free OS users have one of the either installed too, to run stuff like the excellent NEdit. Being able to install dillo on AIX, Solaris, IRIX, HP-UX without having to install an additional toolkit would just be nice. Athena is also present everywhere, but let's say it is a bit primitve. Of course, super-fast :) So I ask: how much of dillo's code is GTK dependent and how difficult would it be to port it to another toolkit? I have quite little experience with toolkits and since I don't know GTK it seems impossible to me alone. One of the nicest things, IMHO, would be a toolkit-independent dillo. Have a look at what the excellet GVIM does or at what amaya does (or, at least, did). Choose your toolkit! I don't know how they structured their code and their graphic drawing, but it would be interesting to investigate. -Riccardo

May 1, 2004