February 2004 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]AIX : illegal instruction

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Riccardo, Andreas: On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Hi, > > I followed the progress on the mailing list, but was always > too late ;-) ... > > About the WAIT_ANY : AIX 4.3.3 (and Ricardo's 4.2.X) indeed > does not define WAIT_ANY. I checked man-pages on several OS's > and neither says anything about this being standard, but all > agree that "-1" is standard, so "-1" is probably the way to go. That's what I put in CVS. > > > I compiled dillo 0.80 Jan-30 tarball after having applied the patches by > > Andreas (namely undefining func_data before ever gtk.h include) > > I never dug deep enough to find out if this is the right way > to solve this problem. Apparently, both AIX-internals and GTK define > this "func_data", I only remember that the AIX definition was for > something we don't need - but I don't remember the details. > > > > % grep func_data * > > browser.h:#undef func_data > > dns.h:#undef func_data > > web.h:#undef func_data > > *If* that ever wants to go into dillo, a cleaner way would be to > enclose it in "#ifdef _AIX" - but I don't know about AIX5 AIX defines func_data in timer.h, and GTK also used it. Is an AIX/GTK problem and was solved in GTK+-1.2.10. (http://www.aoindustries.com/docs/glib-1.2.10/ChangeLog) > > > The compilation ends (although I saw some wanrings about vsnprintf > > implicitly declared... > > > > But startup fails, GDB gives me the following: > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x0 in ?? () from /usr/local/build/dillo-0.8.0-pre/src/./dillo > > and now I'm lost ... is this all the output ? Well, <q> dnl From: mlaster(a)metavillage.com (Mike Laster) dnl AIX 4.1.4.x does not have header files for snprintf/vsnprintf dnl So using the internal versions generates a load of warnings dnl during compile. </q> AFAIU it makes noise only. Cheers Jorge.-

Feb. 1, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]AIX : illegal instruction

by Andreas Schweitzer

Hi, I followed the progress on the mailing list, but was always too late ;-) ... About the WAIT_ANY : AIX 4.3.3 (and Ricardo's 4.2.X) indeed does not define WAIT_ANY. I checked man-pages on several OS's and neither says anything about this being standard, but all agree that "-1" is standard, so "-1" is probably the way to go. > I compiled dillo 0.80 Jan-30 tarball after having applied the patches by > Andreas (namely undefining func_data before ever gtk.h include) I never dug deep enough to find out if this is the right way to solve this problem. Apparently, both AIX-internals and GTK define this "func_data", I only remember that the AIX definition was for something we don't need - but I don't remember the details. > > % grep func_data * > browser.h:#undef func_data > dns.h:#undef func_data > web.h:#undef func_data *If* that ever wants to go into dillo, a cleaner way would be to enclose it in "#ifdef _AIX" - but I don't know about AIX5 > The compilation ends (although I saw some wanrings about vsnprintf > implicitly declared... > > But startup fails, GDB gives me the following: > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0 in ?? () from /usr/local/build/dillo-0.8.0-pre/src/./dillo and now I'm lost ... is this all the output ? Cheers, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

Feb. 1, 2004

[Dillo-dev]AIX : illegal instruction

by Riccardo

Hello, I compiled dillo 0.80 Jan-30 tarball after having applied the patches by Andreas (namely undefining func_data before ever gtk.h include) % grep func_data * browser.h:#undef func_data dns.h:#undef func_data web.h:#undef func_data The compilation ends (although I saw some wanrings about vsnprintf implicitly declared... But startup fails, GDB gives me the following: (gdb) bt #0 0x0 in ?? () from /usr/local/build/dillo-0.8.0-pre/src/./dillo cheers, Riccardo

Feb. 1, 2004