July 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo&sylpheed

by Todd Slater

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:26:22PM +0800, ronnie wrote: > hi all! > > how can I embedded dillo into the sylpheed? > > can someone have done it and give me some advice or resourse? > > thanks! Hi, I use Sylpheed-Claws and it is a matter of enabling the Dillo plugin (do "./configure --help" to see all the options--I think you want --enable-dillo-viewer-plugin IIRC). After you install claws, you have to "turn on" the plugin. Go to Configuration > Plugins and Load the plugin (mine is in /usr/local/lib/sylpheed/plugins--yours may not be depending on how you installed claws). HTH, Todd -- Name that tune #10: Now a very great man once said that some people will rob you with a fountain pen; it didn't take too long to find out just what he was talking about.

July 29, 2003

dillo&sylpheed

by ronnie

hi all! how can I embedded dillo into the sylpheed? can someone have done it and give me some advice or resourse? thanks! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sincerely Yours Xingqiang Wang

July 29, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo &mail

by Melvin Hadasht

Hi, You wrote: > Are there a mail client which work with dillo well? I do not know what do you mean wit "work well", but Sylpheed-Claws has a plugin where it embeds Dillo to securely show HTML mail. http://sylpheed-claws.sourceforge.net/features.php -- Melvin Hadasht

July 29, 2003

Dillo &mail

by ronnie

hi all!! Are there a mail client which work with dillo well? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sincerely Yours Xingqiang Wang Embedded Software Division. Neusoft Middleware Technologies Company Neusoft Park, Hun Nan Industrial Area, New & High-Tech Development Zone, Shenyang 110179, PRC TEL:+86-24-83665518 E-mail:wang_xq@neusoft.com Http://www.neusoft.com

July 29, 2003

why gtk?

by TheStar

What was the basis for using gtk+ in this project? (ie, why gtk+ as opposed to fltk?) Keep in mind that I'm not (yet) a GUI programmer :))

July 28, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Ralph Slooten

Although I'm not a developer, I am a regular user of dillo, and live off it's cvs ;-) May I just conclude that I just love this patch! Thanks, as it makes my life easier I find, and even though I use fluxbox, with tabs (so I already had usage of tabs to a point), I much prefer this method of doing it. Actually I'm running dillo at the moment with 3 separate patches: This one (tabs) External helpers patch (alowing quick starts to the page with a bigger browser which supports the pages dillo cannot render [plugins, css, java, so on]) and lastly the ssl patch (modified due to the tabs patch) My question is this to the dillo developers: Are these patches staying as patches, or is there any consideration to impliment them (or some of them as there are more) as optionals for the future? What I mean "as optionals" is default off, but optionally built in. Thanks again Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org:8080/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"

July 27, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Frank de Lange

On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Mattias ?stergren wrote: > When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. > Feature or bug? Bug, will fix for next patch... Thanks for noticing, I had not... Cheers//Frank [ working on frames now... ] -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

July 25, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Kelson Vibber

On Friday 25 July 2003 10:30 am, Mattias Östergren wrote: > When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in > the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. Feature or bug? That reminds me, I had a patch to add a title to the Bookmarks page - something I noticed because of this. (attached) -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

July 25, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available!

by Mattias Östergren

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:03:01 +0200 Frank de Lange <frank(a)unternet.org> wrote: > No known issues this time... > > Please... test this patch, and tell me what works/what does not/what you > want to see changed... The patch does not just give Dillo tab > functionality, it also provides a framework for implementing frames (no > pun intended) by separating 'document' from 'interface' code. So, the > sooner it is in CVS, the better... When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. Feature or bug? -- mattias östergren | /"\ compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign gävle, sweden | X No HTML in e-mail http://spikboll.net | / \

July 25, 2003

Re: Same bug again... (fwd)

by Jorge Arellano Cid

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:38:08 -0400 (CLT) From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> To: Sebastian Geerken <s.geerken(a)ping.de> Subject: Re: Same bug again... (this forwarded message doesn't include the original attachments) ---------------------------------------- Sebastian, > On Thu, Jul 24, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Sorry for knocking again on the same bug, but please > > acknowledge you've read my report on the mailing list. > > Yes, I received it (and also your other mail today). I'm quite under > stress at work due an x mio EUR (or whatever) project presentation :-( > > I cannot say when I'll have this bug fixed, I won't have much time at > the weekend, but hopefully in the next week. I understand. BTW, I gave a hand at trying to hunt the bug, and reduced the HTML page to reproduce it (attached), but it also requires a customized slow.c (also attached; it sends by bytes instead of chunks and allows changing the speed). A simple: ...slow?/tmp/b2.html will do. The bug has to do with the new way of handling NOWRAP. Adding more lines to the example table doesn't help, a window resize also doesn't help, but a back/forward fixes it. Hope this findings help. > > > I really don't want to upload the 0.8.0-pre tarball before > > 0.7.3 is out, and although a "first impression" is not accurate > > (agreed!), it helps to calm me down! :-) > > I don't know the state of 0.8.0-pre (I had no time to look at it at > all), but it may be an option to skip 0.7.3, depending on how much > time you estimate until 0.8.0 is mature for release. In this case, I > had some time to test and review the new (actually old, but never > used) code for incremental resizing. 0.8.0 may take a while before the final release; it is stable but we don't know what issues may spring. It also needs polishing before end users can play with it. One way to solve this problem is to tag current CVS as 0.7.3-rc1, and then upload the truckload of changes that 0.8.0-pre has. Then you can freely work on fixing the bug on 0.7.3-rc1, and when that's done we release 0.7.3 to the public. That way, I can finally let our developers play with 0.8.0-pre from CVS. You get out of the release pressure, and the only thing to be done after 0.7.3 is ready, is to forward port the fixes to CVS (currently 0.8.0-pre is up to date with 0.7.3 CVS). The other goodie that comes from making a 0.7.3 release is that as a long time has passed since our last release, not making this intermediate one would put a lot of pressure on 0.8.0's timeline. Sounds good for you? Best Jorge.-

July 25, 2003