April 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Andreas Schweitzer

Hi, > Png_error_handling: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.0.14 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Something is screwy with your versions. The 1.0.X series is quite old. Dillo may even work with it, but apparently, you got some mixture of versions on your machine, since further down you have a later version of png. > # ldd /usr/bin/dillo > libpng.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x40028000) ^^^^^ This is no longer the 1.0.X series. > So my question is how does libpng-1.0.14 relate to libpng.so.2? 1.0.14 is older than 1.2.X (and libpng.so.2 is 1.2.X) BTW, double check which executable you are using. Didn't you also install at some point the RH rpm ? Which seemed to becompiled with some 1.0.X version ? HTH, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Andreas Schweitzer

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 10:38:59PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Victor Sahlstedt <salan(a)myrealbox.com> [04-29-03 22:19]: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:38:36 -0500 > > Patrick Shanahan <paka(a)MyRealBox.com> wrote: > > > > > Having successfully compiled 0.7.0, 0.7.1 & 0.7.12, I am unable to > > > compile 0.7.2. I get the following errors which mean very little to > > > me. Any help or direction will be appreciated. > > > > Perhaps outdated libpng? Get the latest stable at; > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5624 > > sourceforge has libpng-1.2.5-? > I have libpng-1.2.4-58 > dillo configure.in looks for: > PNG_CONFIG="hich libpng-config || which libpng12-config" > > ??? Either you should do a clean upgrade or patch the configure script (see below). The "which libpng-config" stuff is perefctly ok. However, for version 1.2.5 the png folks added a few options to libpng-config which are not present for version 1.2.4. But as the developers of dillo use bleeding edge version, we assume 1.2.5 ;-) .... Anyways, dillo will run perfectly fine with png1.2.anyversion To use the Suse supplied libpng, patch the configure script with the attached patch. This patch is so trivial, you probably can do it by hand :-) ... All right, as a last word : Since I am mostly responsible for that part in dillo : I will, from now on, test on the SuSe machines I have access to ;-) .... (although I don't like Suse ...). Cheers, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Joe Hill

Love it! It even picks up my mouse-wheel on the bottom scrollbar, Galeon and Mozilla would never do that! I love you guys! Oh, but one little thing, it would be nice to be able to middle-click on the browser to load a URL, but I'll wait for that, hell I didn't even look for a TODO. On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:43:23-0700 Kelson Vibber<kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 29 April 2003 03:24 pm, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Dillo-0.7.2 is ready for download at the website. The > > announcement is delayed one day or two to give enough time for > > the .deb (and maybe a .rpm) to be already packaged when it goes > > public. > > RPMs for Red Hat 7.3 and 9 are up at > http://www.hyperborea.org/software/dillo.html > > -- > Kelson Vibber > www.hyperborea.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] 0.7.2 installation problem

by Kelson Vibber

(from SuSe thread) >Yes, I got that problem too when I tried to build Dillo 0.7.2 earlier today. Whoops! I didn't notice that the first time through the thread! The src.rpm probably won't work either, since what it does is compile it and then build an RPM from that - and if you can't compile it, you're back at square one. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] 0.7.2 installation problem

by Kelson Vibber

On Tuesday 29 April 2003 10:58 am, William Trenker wrote: > I just downloaded > http://www.hyperborea.org/software/repackaged/dillo-0.7.2-1.rh7.i386.rpm > and installed it using this command: > rpm -Uvh --nodeps dillo-0.7.2-1.rh7.i386.rpm The system I built that on is using the libpng included with Red Hat - specifically, the latest errata package for 7.3. > (To be fair, I had to use the --nodeps option because without it rpm > complains that I don't have libpng.so.2. This is always risky unless you *know* you have the right version for what you're installing. > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 8 14:42 /usr/lib/libpng.so > > libpng12.so.0.1.2.4* So you have custom-installed libpng 1.2.4, correct? (From another thread) >So my question is how does libpng-1.0.14 relate to libpng.so.2? There are two levels of versioning in most shared libraries - the exact version of the code (1.0.14) and a binary compatibility level for the shared object (so) library (2). This means if you upgrade the library from, say, version 1.0.13 to version 1.0.14, but they're both so level 2, you won't need to recompile other applications that use it. It sounds to me like 1.0 and 1.2 are not binary compatible, and a quick look at http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html confirms this. > /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 -> libpng.so.3.1.2.1* It looks like your version of libpng is really so level 3, but is also claiming to handle so level 2. My suggestion would be to download http://www.hyperborea.org/software/repackaged/dillo-0.7.2-1.src.rpm and run rpmbuild --rebuild dillo-0.7.2-1.src.rpm This should compile an RPM that uses your own copy of libpng, which should resolve the problem. What distribution are you running? Red Hat 7.x or 8? A Mandrake release? Something else? (I don't have a Red Hat 8 system right now to test on; I upgraded it to RH 9 last week. I just remember that the 7.x RPMs I built for 0.7.1.2 worked on RH 8 as well. I have some unused drive space, so I may install RH 8 and possibly another distro just for building/testing.) I'll update my page to include remarks about libpng versions. > Do you know where I can get a libpng that meets dillo's needs? In this case, updates.redhat.com - but since that would downgrade your copy, I suggest using the Dillo src.rpm instead. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Victor Sahlstedt

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:38:59 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka(a)MyRealBox.com> wrote: > > Perhaps outdated libpng? Get the latest stable at; > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5624 > > sourceforge has libpng-1.2.5-? > I have libpng-1.2.4-58 > dillo configure.in looks for: > PNG_CONFIG="hich libpng-config || which libpng12-config" > > ??? Well, I'm using 1.2.5 and it works so maybe it's worth a shot? - Victor

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Patrick Shanahan

* Victor Sahlstedt <salan(a)myrealbox.com> [04-29-03 22:19]: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:38:36 -0500 > Patrick Shanahan <paka(a)MyRealBox.com> wrote: > > > Having successfully compiled 0.7.0, 0.7.1 & 0.7.12, I am unable to > > compile 0.7.2. I get the following errors which mean very little to > > me. Any help or direction will be appreciated. > > Perhaps outdated libpng? Get the latest stable at; > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5624 sourceforge has libpng-1.2.5-? I have libpng-1.2.4-58 dillo configure.in looks for: PNG_CONFIG="hich libpng-config || which libpng12-config" ??? -- Patrick Shanahan Please avoid TOFU and trim >quotes< http://wahoo.no-ip.org Registered Linux User #207535 icq#173753138 @ http://counter.li.org Linux, a continuous *learning* experience

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Victor Sahlstedt

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:38:36 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka(a)MyRealBox.com> wrote: > Having successfully compiled 0.7.0, 0.7.1 & 0.7.12, I am unable to > compile 0.7.2. I get the following errors which mean very little to > me. Any help or direction will be appreciated. Perhaps outdated libpng? Get the latest stable at; http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5624 - Victor

April 30, 2003

dillo-0.7.2 compile probs SuSE 8.1

by Patrick Shanahan

Having successfully compiled 0.7.0, 0.7.1 & 0.7.12, I am unable to compile 0.7.2. I get the following errors which mean very little to me. Any help or direction will be appreciated. checking png.h usability... no checking png.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: png.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: png.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: png.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to bug-autoconf(a)gnu.org. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## checking for png.h... yes checking for png_check_sig in -lpng... no checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... no checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking fcntl.h usability... no checking fcntl.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: fcntl.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: fcntl.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: fcntl.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to bug-autoconf(a)gnu.org. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## checking for fcntl.h... yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking sys/uio.h usability... no checking sys/uio.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/uio.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/uio.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/uio.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to bug-autoconf(a)gnu.org. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## checking for sys/uio.h... yes checking for socket... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile sed: file ./confstatT5yymW/subs-2.sed line 19: Unterminated ' command config.status: creating dpi/Makefile sed: file ./confstatT5yymW/subs-2.sed line 19: Unterminated ' command config.status: creating doc/Makefile sed: file ./confstatT5yymW/subs-2.sed line 19: Unterminated ' command config.status: creating src/Makefile sed: file ./confstatT5yymW/subs-2.sed line 19: Unterminated ' command config.status: creating src/IO/Makefile sed: file ./confstatT5yymW/subs-2.sed line 19: Unterminated ' command config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands And I end up with a Makefile of 0 bytes. System is SuSE 8.1. tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Please avoid TOFU and trim >quotes< http://wahoo.no-ip.org Registered Linux User #207535 icq#173753138 @ http://counter.li.org Linux, a continuous *learning* experience

April 30, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Thank you..

by Victor Sahlstedt

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:58:32 -0400 Bas van Besouw <bvanbesouw(a)wideopenwest.com> wrote: > It has probably been said a million times (however I could only find 1) but I like to thank all of you guys for writing Dillo. > > It is a great piece of work, that makes the internet actually look fast.:) > > Thanks again I second that :-) - Victor

April 30, 2003