March 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

bm_serv or dillo

by slymer＠slymer.org

Dillo acts a bit funny when I try to add a bookmark sometimes. For example, I tried to add this "Local: Procmail" right after I cliked "submit" Dillo started using about 90% of CPU and kinda' froze but I coul still shut it down without resorting to "kill -9". -- Registered Linux user #298569 Wad some power the giftie gie us To see oursels as others see us. -- R. Browning

March 24, 2003

RE: [Dillo-dev] Remote control reloading

by Eric GAUDET

Easy enough. -- En reponse de "[Dillo-dev] Remote control reloading" de Christian W. Zuckschwerdt, le 23-Mar-2003 : > Hi, > > dillo is really a neat, compact and precise instrument. I don't want to > see it being clobbered in any way. I have one request for bloat though. > > What about implementing some signals dillo would react on. > I.e. SIGHUP to make dillo reload the page. > > (I'd like to use dillo to render the output of some shells scripts > interactivly. These scripts are derived from cgi-bins.) > > Perhaps you wouldn't consider this bloat at all. > > > cu. > : > Christian > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric GAUDET <eric(a)rti-zone.org> Le 23-Mar-2003 a 12:01:36 "Parler pour ne rien dire et ne rien dire pour parler sont les deux principes majeurs et rigoureux de tous ceux qui feraient mieux de la fermer avant de l'ouvrir." ------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 23, 2003

Remote control reloading

by Christian W. Zuckschwerdt

Hi, dillo is really a neat, compact and precise instrument. I don't want to see it being clobbered in any way. I have one request for bloat though. What about implementing some signals dillo would react on. I.e. SIGHUP to make dillo reload the page. (I'd like to use dillo to render the output of some shells scripts interactivly. These scripts are derived from cgi-bins.) Perhaps you wouldn't consider this bloat at all. cu. : Christian

March 23, 2003

Selection (again)

by Sebastian Geerken

Hi! I've just committed some changes, which fix bugs related to selection. I've tested all reports (at least those with a meaningful mail subject :-), the only page which does not work currently is "www.slackware.com" (that's a bug lying somewhere else). Those who send me reports without an exact description (and of course, anyone else), please check out the latest CVS and test again. Sebastian

March 23, 2003

[Dillo-dev][PATCH] /etc/dillorc installation

by Patrice Mandin

Hello (or good night, as I should be sleeping right now), Here is a little patch to the top level Makefile.am, where there is not-so-clean stuff for installing dillorc. I was lucky to found the same thing in mesa sources. Also, 'make dist' seems to work (at least for me). -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://membres.lycos.fr/pmandin/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux

March 23, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Bug 433

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Just to clarify a bit the stuff that is now in the arcives ;-) > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:51:47PM -0800, Geek wrote: > > Thank you - the problem is solved. I completely removed using "make uninstall" > > then using my trusty Midnight Commander, hunted down all the remnants and > > directories and removed them. I re-downloaded Dillo, installed from scratch and > > it seems fine now. > > > > I had tried reinstalling one already to no avail, but I had not removed /.dillo > > before, in order to keep my bookmarks, cookies and rc file. > > Now careful ! I meant to remove ONLY a possible > bm_srv12 sitting in there. One more thing. If the server is running: ps aux|grep bm_srv kill <bm_srv's PID> Cheers Jorge.- > > > So I guess the lesson here is - when upgrading Dillo, wipe *everything* old > > Dillo out completely, first. > > No, not wipe everything. Just make sure, that any new > executable gets installed in the BEGINNING of $PATH. > (this is really not that surprising :-) ...) > And that you don't have any old executables in ~/.dillo/ > > dillo searches (at least the bookmarkserver for now) first > in ~/.dillo/ and then in $PATH. This can be handy for > developing plugins but can be confusing, too. > > Cheers, > Andreas > > -- > **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** > Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg > Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 > D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198 > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

March 22, 2003

Dillo on sparc64 again

by Damien Couderc

Hi ! > > First i'm sorry to be a bit late to reply, i'm really busy with a > > new project actually. > > > > For the sparc64 we use gcc 2.95.3 by default, but we also have a > > port of 3.2.2 (but i don't remember if i tested with 3.2.2 so i'll > > check it). Well it seems that building dillo with gcc 3.2.2 is worst than with 2.95.3 as it give the same result but fail to display some site (and even the default page). I've also seen warnings on incorrect pointer types that i didn't seen with gcc 2.95.3 so i'll take a look further. Damien

March 22, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Bug 433

by Andreas Schweitzer

Just to clarify a bit the stuff that is now in the arcives ;-) On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:51:47PM -0800, Geek wrote: > Thank you - the problem is solved. I completely removed using "make uninstall" > then using my trusty Midnight Commander, hunted down all the remnants and > directories and removed them. I re-downloaded Dillo, installed from scratch and > it seems fine now. > > I had tried reinstalling one already to no avail, but I had not removed /.dillo > before, in order to keep my bookmarks, cookies and rc file. Now careful ! I meant to remove ONLY a possible bm_srv12 sitting in there. > So I guess the lesson here is - when upgrading Dillo, wipe *everything* old > Dillo out completely, first. No, not wipe everything. Just make sure, that any new executable gets installed in the BEGINNING of $PATH. (this is really not that surprising :-) ...) And that you don't have any old executables in ~/.dillo/ dillo searches (at least the bookmarkserver for now) first in ~/.dillo/ and then in $PATH. This can be handy for developing plugins but can be confusing, too. Cheers, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

March 22, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Bug 433

by Geek

Thank you - the problem is solved. I completely removed using "make uninstall" then using my trusty Midnight Commander, hunted down all the remnants and directories and removed them. I re-downloaded Dillo, installed from scratch and it seems fine now. I had tried reinstalling one already to no avail, but I had not removed /.dillo before, in order to keep my bookmarks, cookies and rc file. So I guess the lesson here is - when upgrading Dillo, wipe *everything* old Dillo out completely, first. As a sidepoint, I'm glad it wasn't the kernel - kernel 2.4.x has BIG compatibility issues with my machine for some reason :-\ Thank you again. I hope this is of some use to someone :-) -- Gregg Behold, Andreas Schweitzer scribbled: > > The bug I am experiencing causes Dillo-0.7.1.2 to crash everytime I try to use > > bookmarkd. It also crashes when I try to bookmark a page or manually type > > dpi:/bm/ to the address line. > > Combining this with the rest of the bug report, I would say, > you may be runing the wrong/old bookmark server, becaue > you MAY have more than one. To chek, do > ls ~/.dillo/bm_srv12 > and delete it if you find one. Then do > which bm_srv12 > and delete. Repeat the "which bm_srv12" until all are gone. > Then re-install. > > > I am using Debian woody with kernel 2.5.65 (bug noticed while running 2.5.63). > > The bug also appears when I boot into kernel 2.2.22. IMO, it's not a > > compatibility issue there. > > Well, dillo and the bm_srv talk via sockets (Kernel) in /tmp (tmpfs ? -> Kernel). > Do you have a 2.4.19 or 2.4.20 or something like that ? <snip>

March 22, 2003

Bug 433

by Geek

Hello, I am the submitter of bug #433. I just noticed the comment on the bug for me to write to this mailing list. I am a first time poster :-) The bug I am experiencing causes Dillo-0.7.1.2 to crash everytime I try to use bookmarkd. It also crashes when I try to bookmark a page or manually type dpi:/bm/ to the address line. I am using Debian woody with kernel 2.5.65 (bug noticed while running 2.5.63). The bug also appears when I boot into kernel 2.2.22. IMO, it's not a compatibility issue there. I have 128MB RAM, 30 Gig fujitsu HD, Cyrix-III, 700MHz cpu, Asus P7V mobo. Ummmm, I dunno what other info you fellas might need on this. Lemmie know. Thanks, -- Gregg

March 22, 2003