December 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: BUG#494

by Anders Gavare

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago I read this bug and now the CVS has a bunch of > fixed for signed/unsigned conflicts that may cause trouble on > 64bit machines. Please test our CVS and tell me if the bug > persists. Once I found out what the problem was, I mailed Sebastian Geerken about it. I think that was in September. http://cvs.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/dillo/dillo/src/dw_widget.c… That fixed the rendering bug. I'm sorry that I forgot to remove the entry from the bug database. I've not had any other problems on sparc64 yet, except possible some random lock-ups. The version in CVS as of 07:00 this morning seems to work just fine (that is, it still has the random lock-ups but the output looks nice). > Cheers > Jorge.- I use dillo daily. It is very neat, especially on non-i386 platforms. Keep up the good work :-) regards Anders

Dec. 10, 2003

navigation

by montegue＠myrealbox.com

i would like to see in addition to the forward and backward navigation buttons, one that goes to the parent directory, like konqueror does, and galeon if i am not mistaken :) thanks for a terrific application -- GR I have seen the future and it is just like the present, only longer. -- Kehlog Albran

Dec. 9, 2003

BUG#494

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi, Some time ago I read this bug and now the CVS has a bunch of fixed for signed/unsigned conflicts that may cause trouble on 64bit machines. Please test our CVS and tell me if the bug persists. You can send me the screenshot (not to dillo-dev please) Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 9, 2003

Re: dpid

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Ferdi Franceschini wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:25:20AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > Hi Ferdi, > > > > I've catched an API problem inside the capi/cache that may be > > the cause for the fork-hog. This note is just to keep you from > > wasting time reviewing it. I'll write to you soon. > Great. It _was_ the cause! There was a race condition hidden behind the lack of dpi-cache connection (the part we blamed) and a slightly broken API (the cloaked problem). As a matter of fact this bug had remained unnoticed maybe for years. In my patched tree (which is under test), the bug is fixed (both parts) and dillo works even better than before. > I think I have a new solution to the inf loop caused when a connection is not > accepted on a dpi socket for any reason. This new solution does not require > any code changes to the plugins. I will post more info to dillo-dev but I need > to experiment a bit first. That's good news. Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 9, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] wanted: CPU overhead source.

by Frank de Lange

BTW, The new kbnav patch is NOT on the site yet, wait for the announcement before you try to download it... Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Dec. 5, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] wanted: CPU overhead source.

by Frank de Lange

Related to this, I have a new version (probably the last, announcement to follow) of the kbnav patch which solves some performance issues related to g_list_search_custom(). This function, which caused an enormous overhead, has been eliminated from the patch alltogether in favor of a hashtable-based search. Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Dec. 5, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] wanted: CPU overhead source.

by Johannes Hofmann

Hi Jorge, On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:43:34AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > I could not yet get any reproducible results from profiling, > > !? > > Doesn't it show any function usage-ratio/run-time change? > Ok, I redid the profiling on my slower Linux box with utilities.html. Html_cleanup_tag is called more often in cvs version (16742 vs. 10749) and seems quite a bit slower than in 0.7.3. See gprof output below. Hope that helps, Johannes PS: Of course I can send you the whole gprof output, but it is quite large, so I did not want to send the whole thing to the list. ================================= current cvs ============================: Flat profile: Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. % cumulative self self total time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name 12.24 0.24 0.24 27862 8.61 8.61 Html_get_attr2 11.73 0.47 0.23 58152 3.96 6.88 Dw_page_real_word_wrap 8.67 0.64 0.17 16742 10.15 12.71 Html_cleanup_tag 5.61 0.75 0.11 61 1803.28 6299.81 Html_write_raw 4.59 0.84 0.09 354712 0.25 0.25 a_Dw_widget_get_type 4.59 0.93 0.09 14073 6.40 13.90 p_Dw_widget_queue_resize 3.06 0.99 0.06 15306 3.92 3.92 Dw_page_add_line 3.06 1.05 0.06 2207 27.19 27.52 Dw_page_get_extremes 2.55 1.10 0.05 15980 3.13 6.77 Html_process_space 2.55 1.15 0.05 5993 8.34 8.34 Html_push_tag 2.04 1.19 0.04 121087 0.33 0.33 a_Dw_page_get_type 1.53 1.22 0.03 77221 0.39 0.40 Dw_page_get_word_extremes 1.53 1.25 0.03 58845 0.51 0.80 Dw_page_mark_change 1.53 1.28 0.03 23886 1.26 1.26 a_Dw_gtk_viewport_get_type 1.53 1.31 0.03 13499 2.22 12.24 Html_process_word 1.53 1.34 0.03 6883 4.36 4.36 a_Dw_style_new 1.53 1.37 0.03 1887 15.90 129.82 Html_tag_open_table_cell 1.53 1.40 0.03 1887 15.90 39.66 a_Dw_table_add_cell 1.53 1.43 0.03 Dw_page_destroy 1.53 1.46 0.03 Dw_table_size_request 1.02 1.48 0.02 58440 0.34 0.34 Html_tag_compare 1.02 1.50 0.02 19938 1.00 1.00 Dw_page_add_word 1.02 1.52 0.02 16527 1.21 9.69 a_Dw_page_add_text 1.02 1.54 0.02 15155 1.32 1.32 a_Dw_page_add_space 1.02 1.56 0.02 13003 1.54 61.50 Html_process_tag 1.02 1.58 0.02 13003 1.54 3.08 Html_tag_index 1.02 1.60 0.02 8499 2.35 2.77 a_Dw_widget_size_request 1.02 1.62 0.02 6883 2.91 2.91 Dw_style_remove 1.02 1.64 0.02 6151 3.25 3.58 Dw_page_forall 1.02 1.66 0.02 3380 5.92 88.16 Dw_page_rewrap 1.02 1.68 0.02 2729 7.33 17.85 Dw_container_destroy 1.02 1.70 0.02 858 23.31 108.94 Html_tag_open_tr 0.51 1.71 0.01 28657 0.35 0.35 a_Dw_container_get_type 0.51 1.72 0.01 16527 0.61 0.61 Dw_page_calc_text_size 0.51 1.73 0.01 16383 0.61 0.61 a_Dw_table_get_type 0.51 1.74 0.01 8016 1.25 1.25 a_Url_str 0.51 1.75 0.01 6159 1.62 1.62 a_Dw_widget_set_ascent 0.51 1.76 0.01 5993 1.67 6.50 Html_eventually_pop_dw 0.51 1.77 0.01 5993 1.67 14.38 Html_tag_cond_cleanup <snip> ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 69/16742 Html_tag_open_dt [77] 0.00 0.00 426/16742 Html_par_push_tag [88] 0.00 0.00 480/16742 Html_tag_open_dd [68] 0.01 0.00 681/16742 Html_tag_open_table [23] 0.03 0.01 3432/16742 Html_tag_open_tr [19] 0.06 0.01 5661/16742 Html_tag_open_td [7] 0.06 0.02 5993/16742 Html_tag_cond_cleanup [22] [12] 10.9 0.17 0.04 16742 Html_cleanup_tag [12] 0.01 0.03 5993/5993 Html_eventually_pop_dw [37] 0.00 0.00 1314/6883 Dw_style_remove [63] 0.00 0.00 16742/16742 Html_match_tag [227] ----------------------------------------------- ========================== 0.7.3 ===========================: Flat profile: Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. % cumulative self self total time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name 13.71 0.27 0.27 58152 4.64 7.26 Dw_page_real_word_wrap 10.66 0.48 0.21 24525 8.56 8.56 Html_get_attr2 6.60 0.61 0.13 333652 0.39 0.39 a_Dw_widget_get_type 4.57 0.70 0.09 116585 0.77 0.77 a_Dw_page_get_type 3.55 0.77 0.07 19938 3.51 3.51 Dw_page_add_word 3.55 0.84 0.07 61 1147.54 6345.30 Html_write_raw 2.54 0.89 0.05 Dw_page_destroy 2.54 0.94 0.05 Dw_page_size_allocate 2.03 0.98 0.04 58440 0.68 0.68 Html_tag_compare 2.03 1.02 0.04 15304 2.61 2.61 Dw_page_add_line 2.03 1.06 0.04 10749 3.72 4.44 Html_cleanup_tag 2.03 1.10 0.04 5993 6.67 6.67 Html_push_tag 2.03 1.14 0.04 Dw_table_size_request 1.52 1.17 0.03 77221 0.39 0.41 Dw_page_get_word_extremes 1.52 1.20 0.03 51991 0.58 1.26 Dw_page_mark_change 1.52 1.23 0.03 16527 1.82 12.58 a_Dw_page_add_text 1.52 1.26 0.03 15980 1.88 6.64 Html_process_space 1.52 1.29 0.03 13499 2.22 15.57 Html_process_word 1.52 1.32 0.03 12896 2.33 12.23 p_Dw_widget_queue_resize 1.52 1.35 0.03 8499 3.53 4.17 a_Dw_widget_size_request 1.52 1.38 0.03 6883 4.36 4.36 a_Dw_style_new 1.52 1.41 0.03 3238 9.26 17.79 Dw_page_calc_widget_size 1.52 1.44 0.03 2207 13.59 14.37 Dw_page_get_extremes 1.52 1.47 0.03 1362 22.03 29.75 Dw_table_sub_calc_col_widt 1.02 1.49 0.02 28654 0.70 0.70 a_Dw_container_get_type 1.02 1.51 0.02 15155 1.32 1.32 a_Dw_page_add_space 1.02 1.53 0.02 6883 2.91 2.91 Dw_style_remove 1.02 1.55 0.02 5135 3.89 12.34 Html_pop_tag 1.02 1.57 0.02 2117 9.45 9.45 a_Url_free 1.02 1.59 0.02 1784 11.21 11.21 Url_object_new 1.02 1.61 0.02 858 23.31 74.05 Html_tag_open_tr 1.02 1.63 0.02 681 29.37 158.58 Html_tag_open_table 1.02 1.65 0.02 Cache_url_hash 0.51 1.66 0.01 22704 0.44 0.44 a_Dw_gtk_viewport_get_type 0.51 1.67 0.01 16565 0.60 0.60 Html_match_tag 0.51 1.68 0.01 16383 0.61 0.61 a_Dw_table_get_type 0.51 1.69 0.01 13003 0.77 48.25 Html_process_tag 0.51 1.70 0.01 13003 0.77 3.85 Html_tag_index 0.51 1.71 0.01 8345 1.20 1.20 a_Url_str 0.51 1.72 0.01 6150 1.63 2.40 Dw_page_forall 0.51 1.73 0.01 6130 1.63 2.07 Dw_widget_update_cursor 0.51 1.74 0.01 6130 1.63 4.11 a_Dw_widget_unrealize 0.51 1.75 0.01 5312 1.88 7.02 Html_eventually_pop_dw 0.51 1.76 0.01 4383 2.28 2.28 a_Bitvec_free 0.51 1.77 0.01 3380 2.96 96.27 Dw_page_rewrap 0.51 1.78 0.01 3067 3.26 4.04 a_Dw_widget_size_allocate 0.51 1.79 0.01 3065 3.26 12.33 a_Dw_widget_realize 0.51 1.80 0.01 3064 3.26 3.96 Dw_container_remove <snip> ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 69/10749 Html_tag_open_dt [140] 0.00 0.00 426/10749 Html_par_push_tag [110] 0.00 0.00 480/10749 Html_tag_open_dd [78] 0.00 0.00 681/10749 Html_tag_open_table [17] 0.01 0.00 3432/10749 Html_tag_open_tr [27] 0.02 0.00 5661/10749 Html_tag_open_td [9] [35] 2.4 0.04 0.01 10749 Html_cleanup_tag [35] 0.01 0.00 10749/16565 Html_match_tag [93] 0.00 0.00 177/5312 Html_eventually_pop_dw [44]

Dec. 5, 2003

Re: dead link behavior

by Peter Milne

dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2 is the Freebsd ported version of Dillo. No IPv6 I'll do something else...suggestion? :o) -- ~~~Pete~~~ http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com

Dec. 5, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dead link behavior

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Peter Milne wrote: > > This is what Jorge Arellano Cid wrote prior to this response: > > > > >> > >> If I click a link and it turns out to be a dead link.....everything > >> locks > >> up hard and I have to 'xkill' Dillo. > > > > Definitely not normal. Anyway to reproduce it? [snip] > Sure thing, let me click on a dead link. Example: > > (Thu 13:44) happy %dillo > Setting locale to C... > dillo_dns_init: Here we go! > Enabling cookies as from cookiesrc... > Nav_open_url: Url=>about:splash< > Nav_open_url: Url=>http://www2.bsdhound.org< > Dns_server [0]: www2.bsdhound.org is 0x814fe78 > Connecting to 12.*.*.* > > > And there it hangs...... Doesn't happen here. Are you using 0.7.3 or CVS? With IPv6 or default? Has anyone seen this bug? Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 5, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Frames

by Ralph Slooten

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:32:17 -0700 (MST) "Peter Milne" <peter(a)milneweb.com> wrote: > Tell me, if I recall, there is a way to view frames in > Dillo...correct? Would love to use it for Squirrelmail. Would > actually be willing to use another web based, imap mail client too. Tried searching the archives? LOL. The standard dillo does not (yet?) support frames, however Frank de Lange has provided patches for quite a while now on his site. http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/ Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"

Dec. 5, 2003