November 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: [PATCH] cleanup of URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS

by Frank de Lange

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: >On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Frank de Lange wrote: > > > >>Jorge, >> >>Skip that last patch I sent you, here is a new one which also touches >>html.c... Please apply ASAP... >> >> > > Oh!, I'll skip this one too. > > Actually, there's no BUG in the current code (but in the comments). >Fixed now. > > BTW, > >+#define URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS(u) NPTR2STR(URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS_(u)) > > is a bug. > > OK, that NPTR2STR is clearly a bug, but so was the absence of URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS_(u). Or call it a style fault if you want, whatever. I see it is fixed now. Thanks... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [PATCH] cleanup of URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Frank de Lange wrote: > Jorge, > > Skip that last patch I sent you, here is a new one which also touches > html.c... Please apply ASAP... Oh!, I'll skip this one too. Actually, there's no BUG in the current code (but in the comments). Fixed now. BTW, +#define URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS(u) NPTR2STR(URL_ILLEGAL_CHARS_(u)) is a bug. Jorge.-

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] HTTPS Patch

by Indan Zupancic

>>patch will work against the cvs from 11-11, but not from 11-10 (thats >>month-day) and the tabs patch will work against 11-10 and not 11-11. >> >>Kind of a quandary, eh.... The joy of making patches against the CVS version... If the code would be in CVS, then it would stay automatically up to date. Normally, all patches should be made against some logical cvs tag, say, a release, but if the patches are still in development it's logical the maker want them to work with the current cvs version. Personally I'm going a bit crazy because of all those Dillo versions on my hd, one original cvs version, one I work on, one clean one to test if the patches really work, then two fake Dillo directories with symlinks to all the original files, so that I can do "diff -pur" and keep unwanted noise out of the patch, keeping it small and simple. Then I moved all those directories to another pc because I wanted to upgrade my 233 Mhz pc, someone gave me a pentum 3 800 + mobo, one of them more or less broken, whole pc very unstable. Caused major filesystem corruption when I tried it out, got it stable with underclocking the cpu to 700 Mhz, but still can't compile because I suddenly miss some header files. No big deal, I backuped everything, and wanted to switch to Slackware anyway, but still means I have to do all the Dillo stuff via ssh on the other pc, until I have everything back on track again. Anyway, the point was, Frank, you got some tips how to handle all those patches? My current system works fine, but I need yet another directory with Dillo source if I want to make or use another patch. Greetings, Indan

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [RFC] Quo Vadis Dillo

by Indan Zupancic

> So, I'm not that sure about Firebird's search box. Anyone care to > comment on this? I use Firebird too often, and I have that little extra search box. It's small, it's has annoying behaviour, I never use it. Only feature I would like to have that is search related, is that ctrl+g searches for the same string again, no matter in what way you made the first search. Greetings, Indan

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: Keybd 3 patch

by Frank de Lange

Paul Pelzl wrote: >On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Frank de Lange wrote: > > >>[ LIST: please give keyboard navigation, on either version of the >>patch, a workout. This needs some testing if it is to be part of >>mainstream Dillo. Try it in frame sites, try navigatin between frames >>with Tab/Shift-Tab, try the keyboard bindings, etc. ] >> >> > >With tab/frame/keynav patch v14, I've been able to get segfaults pretty >easily just by moving between links. Here are some sample sites: > >http://memepool.com (there is a long link on the current page that causes problems) >http://notlong.com/links/ (the links in the table appear to be problematic) >http://cruel.com (a link about halfway down the current page) >http://vikings.com (one of the first links in the main frame) > >Also, here is an example of a site where the algorithm for determining >the direction of the next link breaks down: > http://linkfilter.net >At the end of each post there are a set of icons which get selected in >a non-intuitive order. > > OK, I fixed this issue as well, by ignoring the individual word size for link allocation. This page now works as you'd expect it to, I'll see if the fix does not adversely affect other sites. If it works out OK consider this issue closed. Cheers//Frank [ who has some time on his hands to fix things at the moment... Anyone looking for an accomplished free software hacker in Västra Götaland, Sweden? ] -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Cookies disabled

by Indan Zupancic

> Edit ~.dillo/cookierc into: > > DEFAULT ACCEPT Seems like a bad idea, I would use DEFAULT ACCEPT_SESSION, and use ACCEPT only for the sites you really need (and trust). Also, only the first Dillo instance has cookie support, so open a new window instead of a new Dillo if you want always cookies. Greetings, Indan

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Cookies disabled

by Mike Eriksen

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, William Trenker wrote: > When dillo starts a console message indicates that cookies are disabled. Is there a way to enable cookies? > > Thanks, > Bill Edit ~.dillo/cookierc into: DEFAULT ACCEPT Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS

Nov. 12, 2003

help

by Pavankumar P

---------------------------------------------------NOTIFICATION-------------- -------------------------------------------- The subject line for this message is prohibited by Symantec AVF and the message was quarantined. The Subject Line of the message falls under restricted category. If you think that the message is valid please raise a call through helpdesk for further clarifications and release of the same." Please note this message will be retained for 3 Days for claim, after which it will be purged. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ID:MTV01EX01::SYQ69c2e949 DISCLAIMER: This message (including attachment if any) is confidential and may be privileged. Before opening attachments please check them for viruses and defects. MindTree Consulting Private Limited (MindTree) will not be responsible for any viruses or defects or any forwarded attachments emanating either from within MindTree or outside. If you have received this message by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change and MindTree shall not be liable for any improper, untimely or incomplete transmission.

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] Version 14 of tab/frames/kbnav patch is ready

by Frank de Lange

Stephan Goetter wrote: >If I have a site with frames and navigate around the history isn't updated >properly. If you click back then you are on the site before. An >additional history per frame would probably do it. Then you could go back >in a frame using the popup menu. > > I'll test if this is a viable option, and add it if it works out OK. >Using tabs the copy&paste just with selection is kind of weird. You >can't select the directory in the location of a site and copy it >to the location of a new tab (cos its the same widget). >If you select some text in tab#1 you can't copy it to location#2. > > Yeah, noticed that as well. I'll see if I can find a cure... >The following patch is useful if you have a lot of tabs. You can jump >from the last to the first and vice versa (using shortcuts). > > I'll try this, and will add it to the patch if it 'feels' right... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Nov. 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: Keybd 3 patch

by Frank de Lange

Andreas Schweitzer wrote: >- I know this has been discussed before, but the use of > Ctrl-Shift-L versus Ctrl-L confuses me almost every > time I want to enter a URL manually. I slowly get used to it - damn > old habits :-) ... but my point is : how many other users > will be confused by this ? > Eventually, this will not matter, because all shortcuts can > be customized, IIRC. > I will probably revert back to CTRL-L for link open, CTRL-U for 'focus location bar' (which does the same when popup_dialogs=NO), and use something else for view source (thereby confusing people who are used to Mozilla et al...). >- One thing I love about dillo is/was that it did not open up > new windows when the author deemed it necesarry. Now, on > some stupid pages I get window after window, just because the > author does know nothing about good web design. > I realize that it's the strict adherence to the _blank > target. > I'll add a preference for that, so it minimizes the number of new pages it opens. Thanks for the feedback! Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

Nov. 12, 2003