October 2003 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by johannes leimbach

Hi ! I'd love to give this patch a try, but unfortunatelity I can't patch the sourcecode. Here's what I do: jojo@jojo ~/dillo-0.7.3 $ patch < dillo-0.7.3-tabs.patch patching file ChangeLog patching file Makefile.in patching file aclocal.m4 patching file autogen.sh patching file configure patching file configure.in patching file dillorc patching file Browser_Frames.txt patching file Browser_Tabs.txt patching file DilloDoc.txt patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] (press enter) Apply anyway? [n] y Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 13. Hunk #3 FAILED at 122. Hunk #4 FAILED at 212. Hunk #5 FAILED at 220. 5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej patching file README Hunk #1 FAILED at 18. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file README.rej patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] [goes on...] Well, don't know why this is. I'd love to hear answer from you how to resolve this :) Thanks a lot for your help! Cu

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Mike Eriksen

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ralph Slooten wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) > Mike Eriksen <kme3(a)mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote: > > > ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> > > try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo` > > RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your > filesize dramatically. > > Greetings > Ralph > -- > http://axljab.homelinux.org/ > "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux" Aha! Learned something new... Now it is 333K :-) Thanks a lot. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS

Oct. 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Ralph Slooten

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) Mike Eriksen <kme3(a)mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote: > ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo` RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your filesize dramatically. Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"

Oct. 3, 2003

tab/frame patch ver. 10 makes huge binary?

by Mike Eriksen

Hi I've been running Dillo 0.7.3 from a rpm on a Redhat 9.0 for a while, but wanted to try out the tab/frame patch. So I downloaded the Dillo tarball, applied the patch, ran configure, make and make install. No problem. Since the tarball suggest /usr/local/bin and the rpm-version /usr/bin I'm able to have both versions simultaneously. However: *** ls -lh /usr/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 297K <blah blah> ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> *** A twelve fold increase in size!!!!? Obviously I did something stupid, but what? Gcc is 3.2.2. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS

Oct. 3, 2003