data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e5a/f5e5a8ae133cb2373256c491379b9f514e22bea1" alt=""
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right. http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html Comments are welcome. If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.) Regards, Jeremy Henty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec98a/ec98ab21e8137c282b165c94c8eea06308d65c36" alt=""
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right.
http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html
Comments are welcome.
If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.)
+1. Just not sure about the last one. I don't know whether it changes the intended semantic for human readers. -- Cheers Jorge.-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e5a/f5e5a8ae133cb2373256c491379b9f514e22bea1" alt=""
Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right.
http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html
Comments are welcome.
If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.)
+1.
Just not sure about the last one. I don't know whether it changes the intended semantic for human readers.
I think it actually corrects the semantics. An initial '::' means resolve the name in the top namespace, not the current one, but the class names used in the docs are relative to dw/lout. So I think the patch does the right thing. Regards, Jeremy Henty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e5a/f5e5a8ae133cb2373256c491379b9f514e22bea1" alt=""
I wrote:
Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right.
http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html
Comments are welcome.
If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.)
+1.
Just not sure about the last one. I don't know whether it changes the intended semantic for human readers.
I think it actually corrects the semantics. An initial '::' means resolve the name in the top namespace, not the current one, but the class names used in the docs are relative to dw/lout. So I think the patch does the right thing.
Bump! Is it OK for me to push these or is more discussion needed? Regards, Jeremy Henty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf916/bf91679604b1c4878824adfe3040147ab812c49e" alt=""
Sorry for the late response. On Sa, Apr 04, 2015, Jeremy Henty wrote:
I wrote:
Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right.
http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html
Comments are welcome.
If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.)
+1.
Just not sure about the last one. I don't know whether it changes the intended semantic for human readers.
I think it actually corrects the semantics. An initial '::' means resolve the name in the top namespace, not the current one, but the class names used in the docs are relative to dw/lout. So I think the patch does the right thing.
Bump! Is it OK for me to push these or is more discussion needed?
Haven't yet tested them, but they look OK; so push them if they don't break anything. As for "::" vs. "\ref": I added "::" to have a reference at all. I'm not sure about the exact rules, but Doxygen seems to regard anything containing "::" as reference. If "\ref" works, it looks cleaner IMO. Sebastian
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e5a/f5e5a8ae133cb2373256c491379b9f514e22bea1" alt=""
Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Sorry for the late response.
On Sa, Apr 04, 2015, Jeremy Henty wrote:
I wrote:
Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Three small patches that fix autolinking errors in the documentation. The first two escape the autolinking syntax in a few places where it was not intended to be a link. The third fixes a few places where a link was intended but the autolink syntax was not quite right.
http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-hash-characters.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-escape-double-colons.html http://starurchin.org/dillo/patch/doxygen-fix-simple-name-refs.html
Comments are welcome.
If these are OK I can push them myself as I have write permission. (It's actually easier for me to do it myself because Mercurial Queues does not notice when the remote repository has a patch that is identical to a patch in its queue and generates spurious errors.)
+1.
Just not sure about the last one. I don't know whether it changes the intended semantic for human readers.
I think it actually corrects the semantics. An initial '::' means resolve the name in the top namespace, not the current one, but the class names used in the docs are relative to dw/lout. So I think the patch does the right thing.
Bump! Is it OK for me to push these or is more discussion needed?
Haven't yet tested them, but they look OK; so push them if they don't break anything.
OK, it is done.
As for "::" vs. "\ref": I added "::" to have a reference at all. I'm not sure about the exact rules, but Doxygen seems to regard anything containing "::" as reference.
If "\ref" works, it looks cleaner IMO.
I agree. Regards, Jeremy Henty
participants (3)
-
jcid@dillo.org
-
onepoint@starurchin.org
-
sgeerken@dillo.org