Secure: yes, Though Features Missing; and Bugs
( I already wrote this entire message, and only then noticed eocene didn't send this to dillo-dev but only to me. But I now have to, All written. Can't correct that now. ) On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:14:36PM +0000, eocene wrote:
miroslav.rovis1 wrote:
ukrainian at uabox ~ $ Domain: Default accept.
By the way, if you're interested in making your browsing more secure, you could modify your domainrc file not to have 'accept' as its default rule. Let me first reply to this message. I really wish to start viewing dillo more comfortably first, so this will wait.
But, since I started about it here, let me explain. Look here, how my dillo brings pages to me currently: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1004014.html#7724054 and currently, download and open the mkv files... (So people reading later, open the, hopefully, webm files. That's how it was, talking to you in the future.) Those mkv files will, hopefully, soon be replaced with the HTML5 compliant webm files. So if opened those, that's how it shows currently. I was only able to use dillo after reverting my 1024x768 capable old monitor, to 800x600, in another display in X (:1.0 in, say, ffmpeg command line), else, I would have gone blind from effort to read. And I still have difficulty reading some of the pages. ##################################################################### The Homepage is particularly too hard to read for, I guess at least a non-insignificant though small percentage (no, not less than a small percentage number, it's not insignificant!) of visitors. The background must be very light. As soon as it is too dark, the font is not easily readable. ##################################################################### I'm not at poor-accessibility eyesight yet, I don't have problems with most of pages. I really don't. Pls. take notice of this claim of mine and value the outlined paragraph with respect to that claim! I hope this will help dillo homepage become more readable. So, first I really need the fonts, and will follow your kind advice, eocene, on the fonts, as soon as I find more free time. domainrc is great thing to try to sort too, but the other issue is urgent. Pls allow more time for me to reply to your other mail (I got two mails of kind advice from eocene. Can't go online (the SourceForge archive) to see if my bad provider and bad regime filtered some emails out from dillo-dev. Busy elsewhere. -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
Miroslav wrote:
But, since I started about it here, let me explain. Look here, how my dillo brings pages to me currently: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1004014.html#7724054 and currently, download and open the mkv files... (So people reading later, open the, hopefully, webm files. That's how it was, talking to you in the future.)
I don't think XFT is enabled in your FLTK. That would explain why you aren't getting DejaVu Sans and the rest...
##################################################################### The Homepage is particularly too hard to read for, I guess at least a non-insignificant though small percentage (no, not less than a small percentage number, it's not insignificant!) of visitors. The background must be very light. As soon as it is too dark, the font is not easily readable. #####################################################################
A couple of years ago, I experimented with a different color scheme, but the other members of the core team weren't enthusiastic about it, so I never made the change. Example: http://www.dillo.org/test/dillo2.html
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 05:24:46AM +0000, eocene wrote:
Miroslav wrote:
But, since I started about it here, let me explain. Look here, how my dillo brings pages to me currently: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1004014.html#7724054 and currently, download and open the mkv files... (So people reading later, open the, hopefully, webm files. That's how it was, talking to you in the future.)
I don't think XFT is enabled in your FLTK. That would explain why you aren't getting DejaVu Sans and the rest...
##################################################################### The Homepage is particularly too hard to read for, I guess at least a non-insignificant though small percentage (no, not less than a small percentage number, it's not insignificant!) of visitors. The background must be very light. As soon as it is too dark, the font is not easily readable. #####################################################################
A couple of years ago, I experimented with a different color scheme, but the other members of the core team weren't enthusiastic about it, so I never made the change. Example: http://www.dillo.org/test/dillo2.html
Pls, pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme. If that were the default, I wouldn't have so much difficulties. And surely others!, as I wrote. Why do large associations, businesses, others, never, almost never have unreadable pages?, never experiment with colors --such as, worth mentioning, some smaller, always only smaller entities, make pages in revert, white on black: which is almost never good, unless you want to exclude readers... Pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme. Thank you!
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev at dillo.org http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
-- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
Miroslav wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 05:24:46AM +0000, eocene wrote:
A couple of years ago, I experimented with a different color scheme, but the other members of the core team weren't enthusiastic about it, so I never made the change. Example: http://www.dillo.org/test/dillo2.html
Pls, pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme.
If that were the default, I wouldn't have so much difficulties. And surely others!, as I wrote. Why do large associations, businesses, others, never, almost never have unreadable pages?, never experiment with colors --such as, worth mentioning, some smaller, always only smaller entities, make pages in revert, white on black: which is almost never good, unless you want to exclude readers...
Pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme. Thank you!
Well, that's 2 votes for it...
I wrote:
Miroslav wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 05:24:46AM +0000, eocene wrote:
A couple of years ago, I experimented with a different color scheme, but the other members of the core team weren't enthusiastic about it, so I never made the change. Example: http://www.dillo.org/test/dillo2.html
Pls, pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme.
If that were the default, I wouldn't have so much difficulties. And surely others!, as I wrote. Why do large associations, businesses, others, never, almost never have unreadable pages?, never experiment with colors --such as, worth mentioning, some smaller, always only smaller entities, make pages in revert, white on black: which is almost never good, unless you want to exclude readers...
Pls. dillo devs, allow that color scheme. Thank you!
Well, that's 2 votes for it...
And we're at zero votes against, here...
participants (2)
-
eocene＠gmx.com -
miroslav.rovis1＠zg.ht.hr