Search results for "plugin" - Dillo-dev

Cookies performance

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:42:03PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > I noticed that since the recent DPI update pages which use > > > cookies load slower (e.g. fltk.org) > > > Do others also see that? It could also be OS specific. > > > > I thought it seemed weirdly slow _sometimes_. > > I'll have to throw some gprof at it and hope for something > > simple and embarrassing. > > > > (I wonder whether it would be easy to do valgrind with dpid and the > > plugins.) > > I did some truss on the cookies dpi and found that it is reading > ~/.dillo/dpid_comm_keys quite often. Maybe that is related. It looks like it checks it through a_Dpip_check_auth() when it gets or sets a msg. As for whether it needs to, I don't know. I tried a little gprof, but a modest amount of browsing and accepting cookies wasn't enough for the dpi to use up enough time for gprof to generate stats.

Jan. 12, 2010

youtube-dl

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

robert w hall wrote: > Would it be 'easy' to turn youtube-dl (written in python) into a > dillo 'plugin'?? That's a fun idea! I'm a big fan of youtube-dl. But I'm not sure what you're suggesting. My dream would be to click on an embedded youtube video and have the download dpi (or something else like it) pull down the video. The problem is that, last time I looked at any rate, dpis are invoked by specific URL schemes. What I'm thinking of would require dillo to invoke dpis when it sees particular bits of HTML. That might be non-trivial to implement. As a side question, how much work would it be to get dillo to render <embed> and <object> elements in a useful way? Now there's a thought! How about if dillo rendered them as clickable boxes linked to some URL like embed://?html=<escaped_html>? Then they could be handled by a dpi that might eg. extract Youtube video URLs and run youtube-dl! Does this sound feasible? Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 2, 2010

dillo bug#1127

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:07:54PM +0200, Urban Lundin wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > That sounds great if you could attempt to solve this issue! > We have made a small example in TCL/TK (which you have to install > first, available through http://www.tcl.tk/) > > We did not try to embed suckless as we could not find a simple > example inside it. > > > Then the example is below. Thanks for the example. For me it works with the following patch for dillo: diff -r ace33e3969af src/xembed.cc --- a/src/xembed.cc Sun Apr 28 15:11:03 2013 +0200 +++ b/src/xembed.cc Mon May 20 19:38:06 2013 +0200 @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ createInternal(xid); setXembedInfo(1); Fl::event_dispatch(event_handler); + Fl_Window::show(); } void Xembed::createInternal(uint32_t parent) { Before pushing it to the main repo I need to read http://standards.freedesktop.org/xembed-spec/xembed-spec-latest.html a bit more, but to me it seems a reasonable thing to do. It would be cool, if anyone using the claws mail dillo plugin could verify that the above patch doesn't break embedding in claws mail. Cheers, Johannes

May 20, 2013

[PATCH] startup window

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:49:44PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Thomas wrote: > > Am Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:47:11 +0200 > > schrieb Hofmann Johannes <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > > Hi, > > > attached patch adds a proper startup screen for dillo. > > > > Oh, is dillo slow enough now that it needs a splash screen distracting the user while waiting for startup? > > I sort of like the "instant startup" behaviour. A splash startup screen reminds you of the startup _not_ being instant. > > Especially opening an extra window wastes CPU cycles, even in X11, that could be used on doing the actual work... > > Of course I'll have to check out a current dillo2 to see how eminent the issue really is. But when we reach the startup speed of e.g. the GIMP with it's endless loading of plugins etc., one can safely declare dillo "just another bloated browser". > > I don't want to be offensive, just voice my concern... > > I agree with Thomas here. Me too. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 2, 2009

Re: FLTK 1.3.0 RC 1 released!

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 05:45:20PM -0900, rogerx.oss(a)gmail.com wrote: > Dunno about the *other* distros, but Gentoo has several versions of FLTK > available including 2.0_pre branch. And, somebody has volunteered a > FLTK-1.3_rc1 ebuild on bugs.gentoo.org. > > Dillo is extremely important on all my platforms as I use Intel P3 CPU's. That's soothing to hear. > Using any other browser, and I'm just wasting my CPU cycles with unneeded html > scripts -- even with noscript & no-ads plugins for Seamonkey! > > Maybe hook-up with the FLTK mailing list to see if they're really going to push > 1.3? They're committed to it. I've posted some links to their forums from time to time. > From what I read a week ago, they're devoting all efforts on 1.3 and > deprecated 2.0 branch. 2.0 branch might get it's features ported to 1.3. In a nutshell: 2.0 is dead. The remaining developers agreed to cuncur on 1.3 long ago, and to try to release near Christmas (still in the ballpark). -- Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 28, 2010

Re: RFC repository

by Rodrigo Arias

Hi, On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 02:08:30PM -0600, pastebin(a)gmx.com wrote: >Rodrigo this looks pretty amazing Thanks! >are you thinking along the lines of a plugin that will take for example on the page >https://github.com/dillo-browser/rfc >the drop down box - when viewed with dillo gives > >Product >Actions >Automate any workflow >Packages >Host and manage packages >Security >Find and fix vulnerabilities >Codespaces >Instant dev environments >GitHub Copilot >Write better code with AI >Code review >Manage code changes >Issues >Plan and track work >Discussions >Collaborate outside of code >Sun, 7 Jul 2024 20:53:34 +0200 >Rodrigo Arias <rodarima(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >and put them into a drop down box? Yeah, that would be one of the use cases: HTML content rewriting. I think it would be easy to have a community maintained repository of rules to "fix the web" so it can be read by Dillo more easily. For now you can use the raw Markdown version to read it from Dillo: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dillo-browser/rfc/rfc-002/rfc-002-rule-ba… Best, Rodrigo.

July 7, 2024

[PATCH] startup window

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:49:44PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Thomas wrote: > > Am Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:47:11 +0200 > > schrieb Hofmann Johannes <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > > Hi, > > > attached patch adds a proper startup screen for dillo. > > > > Oh, is dillo slow enough now that it needs a splash screen distracting the user while waiting for startup? > > I sort of like the "instant startup" behaviour. A splash startup screen reminds you of the startup _not_ being instant. > > Especially opening an extra window wastes CPU cycles, even in X11, that could be used on doing the actual work... > > Of course I'll have to check out a current dillo2 to see how eminent the issue really is. But when we reach the startup speed of e.g. the GIMP with it's endless loading of plugins etc., one can safely declare dillo "just another bloated browser". > > I don't want to be offensive, just voice my concern... > > I agree with Thomas here. > me too - check the date :)

April 1, 2009

Re: Option to define external link handler

by Rodrigo Arias

Hi Diego On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Diego wrote: >I think a good way is to reduce functionality to a minimum. Not to make a >full scripting language, but rather moderately complex hook rules that can >call external scripts or DPIs with complex functionality. This is not a scripting language, just a way to describe rules that can be transformed in quick operations at runtime. We won't be reinventing JS. >Another mistake that can be made is to replace the DPI infrastructure. I >think a cooperation between the two is better. There is no plan to remove the support for DPI plugins, just to increase the capabilities for hooking. >DPIs and authorized scripts can set temporary rules and be called by dillo >on events. >Fixed rules in a rules file call complex scripts or DPIs. That's more or less the idea. >The problem with the DPI infrastructure is that it is an unfinished >infrastructure with very little documentation. There are other structural problems, please check the related issues. https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/issues/65 https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/issues/56 Best, Rodrigo.

July 13, 2024

Re: dpid doesn't work if configured with "--program-suffix=-new"

by Kevin Koster

Detlef Vollmann wrote: > for the time being I'd like to install the current dillo version, > next to the old existing one. > So I configured with "--program-suffix=-new". > Browsing works fine, but plugins (including bm or file) can't be > started, as the binary is called "dpid-new" but dillo tries to > start "dpid". > > It probaly wouldn't work anyway as $HOME/.dillo is hardcoded > and there's no way to give a separate configuration directory > (and sharing .dillo between different version is probably not > a good idea). What about starting Dillo with: HOME=~/dillo-new dillo Then there's a script in the source code root directory called install-dpi-local. Running (from the Dillo source code dir): mkdir ~/dillo-new HOME=~/dillo-new ./install-dpi-local should install dpid and plug-ins to the ~/dillo-new/.dillo/dpi directory where dillo will find them when started in its own home. Alternatively you could manually make symlinks (if supported by your file system) in ~/dillo-new/.dillo/dpi to the "-new" binaries at their installed locations.

July 31, 2024

Re: Hardening Dillo with unveil and pledge

by a1ex＠dismail.de

Hi Rodrigo, On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:34:47 +0200 Rodrigo Arias <rodarima(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >+ if (unveil("/home", "rwc") == -1) { > > We may want to constraint this a bit further, so a malicious actor > cannot read anything from /home/.config. Maybe only /home/.dillo and > the downloads directory would be suitable? Absolutely, that was my initial intention, but just wanted to keep the example patch as simple as possible. There are a number of things in $HOME which we probably don't want the browser having access to. > >+ if (pledge("stdio rpath wpath cpath inet unix dns tty proc > >prot_exec", > > Does this work with plugins, when the dpid daemon is not running?, as > I believe it has to fork and exec the dpid program. I started with a mindset of "whats the bare minimum of permissions we can get away with". But its clear that we would need "exec" as well for full functionality. At some point I may try to submit an improved patch to the OpenBSD ports maintainers. Unfortunately that won't do much for users of Linux and other systems. -Alex

July 20, 2024

Dillo-dev search results for query "plugin"