On 07/28/2010 03:13 PM, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Am 28.07.2010 13:38, schrieb Lars Nooden:
Having only a CMS or only a Wiki would eliminate the need to maintain two tools and train people on both.
True and not true. The problem is when you try to make a CMS out of a wiki you have to remove all the cool features like breadcrumbs, Recentchanges or LinkTo-Search.
Any decent site, whether CMS, Wiki or done the right way as plain HTML, should have those items. Going from one to another does not necessitate removal of those valuable pieces. e.g. cron: find /var/www/vhost1 -mtime -1 -print ¦ awk '{...}' \ | tidy > recent.html
Or when you want that everybody can edit a CMS its hard to administer all the levels of access, too.
So splitting this gives us more flexibility - and also if one goes down, we still will have the other one (that is, if the reason is not a general server failure)
Ok. It's something I will think about. /Lars