-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Janet Hawtin schrieb:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Janet Hawtin <lucychili@gmail.com> wrote:
There should be NO activity which is on a users computer without their choice. You can offer them a CD Cracking is not advocacy.
Sorry but the whole idea of free software is that it is liberty for the user. It doesnt matter whether youre getting into their computer for a cause which you think of as a useful thing. The act of removing their choice is in direct contradiction to the ethos of floss.
I do not think that there is such an ethos. FLOSS only means open source and free licenses, nothiung more. It should not be extended. FLOSS can also mean commercial software which gives users no choice. If you want more or something different you should find a new term. An on "hackers" - "Hackers" are also coders. So no hackers, no FLOSS. But I also think intruding computers does no good promotion for FLOSS. But as a hacker you can show how easy a Windows computer can be intruded. Regards, Thilo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (OpenBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiUdYUACgkQK3WHfZT3wS0+vQCfYM+YmA+qkm4lWasDXxa4IWob EDUAoNB6pkMfnFZVzcOtdcnUYqqL0Luz =UQq6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----