On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote:
Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. I don't think I noticed that earlier.
Oh, I didn't notice too. Is this result reproducible in your computer? -- Cheers Jorge.-
Jorge wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote:
Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. I don't think I noticed that earlier.
Oh, I didn't notice too. Is this result reproducible in your computer?
I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php which is easier to deal with. dillo 8812 4668 -g, no optimization 10940 5852 opening page 14844 9732 retrieving images I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten. firefox 2.0.0.20 54280 21952 to start 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) 55996 25120 with images 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything. firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) 50804 23716 to show page 51764 24812 pref dialog up 49816 25052 with images 47768 25048 after waiting a while
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:54:52PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Jorge wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote:
Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. I don't think I noticed that earlier.
Oh, I didn't notice too. Is this result reproducible in your computer?
I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php which is easier to deal with.
dillo 8812 4668 -g, no optimization 10940 5852 opening page 14844 9732 retrieving images
I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten.
firefox 2.0.0.20 54280 21952 to start 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) 55996 25120 with images 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything.
firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) 50804 23716 to show page 51764 24812 pref dialog up 49816 25052 with images 47768 25048 after waiting a while
afaik firefox stores pixmaps on the server side, so you probabely need to keep an eye on Xorg memory usage too. Cheers, Johannes
participants (3)
-
corvid＠lavabit.com -
jcid＠dillo.org -
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de