We're planning a bugfix release because it turns out that the PNG image size fix added right before the 2.1 release was incorrect. The nominal release date is Friday, but of course we'll see... Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone.
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:50:12AM +0000, corvid wrote:
Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone.
No problems here. $ hg tip changeset: 1207:65ee806d5172 tag: tip user: corvid <corvid@lavabit.com> date: Wed Jul 01 18:27:07 2009 +0000 summary: update for 2.1.1 Jeremy Henty
I wrote:
We're planning a bugfix release because it turns out that the PNG image size fix added right before the 2.1 release was incorrect.
The nominal release date is Friday, but of course we'll see...
Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone.
http://www.dillo.org/download/ now contains dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2 and dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2.asc
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:57:50PM +0000, corvid wrote:
I wrote:
We're planning a bugfix release because it turns out that the PNG image size fix added right before the 2.1 release was incorrect.
The nominal release date is Friday, but of course we'll see...
Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone.
http://www.dillo.org/download/ now contains dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2 and dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2.asc
Even though there is not much time until the official release announcement tomorrow, it would be nice if some packages for dillo-2.1.1 could be made available until then. Thanks to all our packagers btw. :-) Cheers, Johannes
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Johannes Hofmann<Johannes.Hofmann@gmx.de> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:57:50PM +0000, corvid wrote:
I wrote:
We're planning a bugfix release because it turns out that the PNG image size fix added right before the 2.1 release was incorrect.
The nominal release date is Friday, but of course we'll see...
Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone.
http://www.dillo.org/download/ now contains dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2 and dillo-2.1.1.tar.bz2.asc
Even though there is not much time until the official release announcement tomorrow, it would be nice if some packages for dillo-2.1.1 could be made available until then. Thanks to all our packagers btw. :-)
F-11 packages ready @ http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/dillo2/static/
Cheers, Johannes
Michal
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey corvid :) corvid wrote:
Considering how I ripped out a bunch of extraneous system includes right after the 2.1 release, it would be a comfort to know that the code in the repository still compiles for everyone. The current tip [0] compiles and runs fine on solaris [1] with gcc 3.4.3 (gcc 4.4.0 dies compiling dillo, haven't looked deeply into that one, could be the local setup...).
Fltk2 still doesn't build ootb on solaris (same issue I reported a year ago [3], workaround still works...) and they introduced bashisms into their build system and fltk2-config script that makes suns sh throw up (not really motivated to file a bug though)... (btw, given the fact that you are porting dillo to fltk1.3 I wanted to give 1.3 a spin, but the download for the latest snapshot 404s and their download-php-magic makes my eyes bleed (what's wrong with plain directory lists?)... are you sure that fltk is the right choice?) Justus 0: changeset: 1208:7ea0944187ad tag: tip user: corvid <corvid@lavabit.com> date: Thu Jul 02 14:39:11 2009 +0000 summary: Added tag release-2_1_1 for changeset 65ee806d5172 1: $ uname -a SunOS rzdspc6 5.10 Generic_138888-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V445 Solaris 2: $ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath) 3: http://fltk.org/str.php?L1890
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpN+R8ACgkQoPmwNWhsaZbsswCgitF9VpbG8KMStg7D1Uvh2JsS EYoAniHLM6MzuI1OK+2ROoDwH8P09pVG =fSfB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Justus Winter wrote:
> The current tip [0] compiles and runs fine on solaris [1] with gcc 3.4.3
> (gcc 4.4.0 dies compiling dillo, haven't looked deeply into that one,
> could be the local setup...).
Uh, I forgot that the linking failed. I had to add
- -l{X11,Xrender,fontconfig,iconv}. I blame the first three missing libs
on fltk2-config not including them, I am not too sure about iconv though
I tend to blame that on the local setup. Could anyone with access to a
vanilla solaris setup test that?
Justus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkpN/r8ACgkQoPmwNWhsaZa/TwCeLiHf4PWshQH0OMnmBDo+wf5I
8XcAoJg0+HW3HYymtwAg5WMpx1/sRD5E
=0xPN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (5)
-
4winter＠informatik.uni-hamburg.de -
corvid＠lavabit.com -
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de -
newman.x＠gmail.com -
onepoint＠starurchin.org