On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, David McKee wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, David McKee wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: [attribution to me lost]
my gcc doesn't believe in -Wno-unused-parameters, [snip] Attached is a patch [snip] Commited. Does it work for you David?
Perfectly. Thanks.
Having said that on the basis of my gcc 2.95 based debian machine at home, I tried it on my work machine.
The Redhat box actual uses:
$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
*sigh*
[...] Style question:
Would it be better to test for the presence of the flag than to try to exclude those compilers without it?
Yes, that's the right way to do it, but I don't know how yet :) I commited a patch that tests for gcc version 3. Please test it and tell us. Cheers Jorge.-
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, David McKee wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, David McKee wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: [attribution to me lost]
my gcc doesn't believe in -Wno-unused-parameters, [snip] Attached is a patch [snip] Commited. Does it work for you David? [snip] I tried it on my work machine.
The Redhat box actual uses:
$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) [snip] I commited a patch that tests for gcc version 3. Please test it and tell us.
Worked on both machines. Very nice. -- -- David McKee -- dmckee@jlab.org -- (757) 269-7492 (Office)
participants (2)
-
David McKee -
Jorge Arellano Cid