[patch] introduce lout namespace (was: namespace problem)
24 Apr
2008
24 Apr
'08
9:36 p.m.
Hi, while trying to implement a fix to the namespace problem I came to the conclusion that the easiest and least intrusive way is to keep the existing namespaces in the lout directory and just wrap them in another namespace "lout". This fixes the name collision with signal. Cheers, Johannes
26 Apr
26 Apr
8:05 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:18:30PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
Hi,
while trying to implement a fix to the namespace problem I came to the conclusion that the easiest and least intrusive way is to keep the existing namespaces in the lout directory and just wrap them in another namespace "lout". This fixes the name collision with signal.
Committed. BTW, now the documentation should mention this "lout" namespace. ;-) -- Cheers Jorge.-
6086
Age (days ago)
6088
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
jcid＠dillo.org -
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de