Hi all. This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this. ? test/cookies I guess .hgignore needs updating. Regards, furaisanjin
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this.
? test/cookies
I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this.
? test/cookies
I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
I vote bug. Should we put ^ and $ around everything, or something like that?
2010/1/28 corvid <corvid@lavabit.com>:
Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this.
? test/cookies
I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
I vote bug. Should we put ^ and $ around everything, or something like that?
dpidc is part of dillo repository. Was that perl script? Regards, furaisanjin
furaisanjin wrote:
2010/1/28 corvid <corvid@lavabit.com>:
Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this.
? test/cookies
I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
I vote bug. Should we put ^ and $ around everything, or something like that?
dpidc is part of dillo repository. Was that perl script?
Yeah, I think it used to be a perl script. I don't see dpidc in the repository anymore. Hmmm. I just looked back at the 2.1 release code. It had dpid/dpid in .hgignore, but it had dpid.[ch], dpid_common.[ch], dpidc in the repository.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:09:55AM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
2010/1/28 corvid <corvid@lavabit.com>:
Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this.
? test/cookies
I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
I vote bug. Should we put ^ and $ around everything, or something like that?
dpidc is part of dillo repository. Was that perl script?
Yeah, I think it used to be a perl script. I don't see dpidc in the repository anymore.
Hmmm. I just looked back at the 2.1 release code. It had dpid/dpid in .hgignore, but it had dpid.[ch], dpid_common.[ch], dpidc in the repository.
.hgignore is only relevant for untracked (not in the repository) files. Ignored files will not show up in "hg status" output with "?". You can always add ignored files to the repo explicitely with "hg add".
Hmm, this is a puzzle but hg status -i shows all ignored files and dpidc can be seen on the list. Regards, furaisanjin
Johannes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:09:55AM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote:
2010/1/28 corvid <corvid@lavabit.com>:
Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:56:37PM +0000, corvid wrote:
furaisanjin wrote: > This is a minor issue but after building dillo, hg status shows this. > > ? test/cookies > > I guess .hgignore needs updating.
*looks* Why doesn't dpidc need to be in .hgignore?
It is matched by dpid/dpid. Not sure if that is a bug or feature of mercurial.
I vote bug. Should we put ^ and $ around everything, or something like that?
dpidc is part of dillo repository. Was that perl script?
Yeah, I think it used to be a perl script. I don't see dpidc in the repository anymore.
Hmmm. I just looked back at the 2.1 release code. It had dpid/dpid in .hgignore, but it had dpid.[ch], dpid_common.[ch], dpidc in the repository.
.hgignore is only relevant for untracked (not in the repository) files. Ignored files will not show up in "hg status" output with "?". You can always add ignored files to the repo explicitely with "hg add".
Ah. I wonder why mercurial wants to take any notice of untracked files, anyway.
participants (3)
-
corvid＠lavabit.com -
furaisanjin＠gmail.com -
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de