[Dillo-dev]BAD HTML and Good Webmasters
Hi there, These days have brought several good surprises with regard to HTML and good webmasters. For instace, from the sites that appear in our splash screen: The Register: switched to XML! (no BUGS) Slashdot : they're fixing the HTML (some old detected bugs don't show anymore) Monster news: In the process of fixing. Dillo's site: Fixed! (Yes, the new parser catched hidden bugs) also, sourceforge.net and newsforge.com look better with the new parser (not a merit of the sites, but a good new anyway). To finish this report, and with a view to exemplify what you should expect from a good webmaster, I'd like to forward a couple of emails I had with the webmaster of www.fluxagent.org: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:50:12 +0200 From: Markus Kroetzsch <Markus.Kroetzsch@inf.tu-dresden.de> To: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org> Subject: Re: www.fluxagent.org and Dillo Dear Jorge, thank you for your answer. Setting the area > tag fixes the problem, even on my old Dillo 0.7.2. The webpages will be updated shortly to reflect this insight. When viewing the uncorrected page sources with Mozilla, the missing ">" actually shows up automagically, which might be the reason why nobody noticed so far (the pages are auto-generated by a script, so there is just one place where ">" is missing...). Best regards Markus
Hi,
Sometime ago someone filled the following bug record with regard to www.fluxagent.org:
BUG#478 Impact : soft error At : run time Type : misbehaviour Comments: Images used for navigation within a table (each equiped with some polygon-area mouse-<map>) do not always (but sometimes) actually work as links. Maybe related to bug 317? - PS: Great project! - HTReproduce: Go to www.fluxagent.org (valid html4.01). Check the navbar: only the first link works, no matter which sub-page is viewed. WorkedBy : nobody
I tried to get the webmaster's email address from:
http://www.fluxagent.org/emails.htm
but it didn't show for Matthias Fichtner, so I write to you.
The problem is that for some reason I don't yet know of, SGML allows for omitting the '>' closing tag character for the <area> element.
If you check the page with W3C, it validates, but if you do with the WDG validator, then it shows:
http://www.htmlhelp.org/cgi-bin/validate.cgi? url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fluxagent.org&warnings=yes
The easiest solution is to add the missing '>' for each <area> tag.
Hope this helps Jorge.- http://www.dillo.org ------- End of Forwarded message --------
Cheers Jorge.-
participants (1)
-
Jorge Arellano Cid