Hi there, Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium. -- Cheers Jorge.-
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:04:26 -0300 From: jcid@dillo.org To: dillo-dev@dillo.org Subject: [Dillo-dev] Large Panel ? Hi there, ? Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? ? I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.My apologies for sending that last email to your address, Jorge. ?I am part of another mailing list, where when I hit reply it goes to the list, instead of the sender. ?I should look into changing this somehow with my email, as this is not the first time I have made this mistake. ?Anyway, as to my thoughts on the large panel size...
I had actually been using the default, and had completely forgotten that you could change this. ?Now that you brought it up, I think I will be using the "tiny" setting. ?Long story short, you would have no objection from me if you got rid of the large setting. Rob?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:29:36AM -0400, Rob S. wrote:
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:04:26 -0300 From: jcid@dillo.org To: dillo-dev@dillo.org Subject: [Dillo-dev] Large Panel ? Hi there, ? Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc? ? I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.My apologies for sending that last email to your address, Jorge. ?I am part of another mailing list, where when I hit reply it goes to the list, instead of the sender. ?I should look into changing this somehow with my email, as
this is not the first time I have made this mistake. ?Anyway, as to my thoughts on the large panel size...
I had actually been using the default, and had completely forgotten that you could change this. ?Now that you brought it up, I think I will be using the "tiny" setting. ?Long story short, you would have no objection from me if you got rid of the large setting.
Thanks for the feedback. BTW, I just committed a couple of fixes for tiny and large in the 1.3 branch. -- Cheers Jorge.-
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org> wrote:
Hi there,
?Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc?
?I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.
Like Rob, I only just now knew about this. I agree with your decision, if there's only one pulldown menu, why have it on a separate bar? Kind of confused as to why it's called "File" though. I realize that's common for the first pulldown menu to be called 'File', but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense here. Why not just "Menu" like Opera?
-- ?Cheers ?Jorge.-
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:59:03AM -0700, Andrew Harris wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org> wrote:
Hi there,
?Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc?
?I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.
Like Rob, I only just now knew about this. I agree with your decision, if there's only one pulldown menu, why have it on a separate bar?
Kind of confused as to why it's called "File" though. I realize that's common for the first pulldown menu to be called 'File', but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense here. Why not just "Menu" like Opera?
Could be. It may be a matter of taste too. IMO, lots of people have the "File" menu hardcoded in their brains. Now, if we manage to make the widget printing feature of fltk-1.3 work in dillo, it could make good sense to add it under a "Menu" label instead of "File". Comments? -- Cheers Jorge.-
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:04:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: Hi there,
Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc?
I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.
mmm... that's why I got a big "&File" button. Usually, I like big fat buttons and can't stand tiny buttons. (Kiddies usually love the @#$@# tiny buttons along with all the funky 3D eye candy.) Just noticed the small sized buttons are sufficient, even the tiny size is OK too. <shrugs> -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:38:25PM -0800, Roger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:04:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: Hi there,
Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc?
I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.
mmm... that's why I got a big "&File" button. Usually, I like big fat buttons and can't stand tiny buttons. (Kiddies usually love the @#$@# tiny buttons along with all the funky 3D eye candy.)
Just noticed the small sized buttons are sufficient, even the tiny size is OK too.
<shrugs>
IIUR, you had a "large" panel because of a lingering dillorc option (because the default is "medium", and you didn't set it). Also, even though you like fat buttons, "large" mode has no much value for you and and you agree to remove it. Did I get you right? -- Cheers Jorge.-
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:49:26AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:38:25PM -0800, Roger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:04:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: Hi there,
Does anybody use "panel_size=large" in dillorc?
I'd like to remove the option in the 1.3 branch, and keep tiny, small and medium.
mmm... that's why I got a big "&File" button. Usually, I like big fat buttons and can't stand tiny buttons. (Kiddies usually love the @#$@# tiny buttons along with all the funky 3D eye candy.)
Just noticed the small sized buttons are sufficient, even the tiny size is OK too.
<shrugs>
IIUR, you had a "large" panel because of a lingering dillorc option (because the default is "medium", and you didn't set it).
Also, even though you like fat buttons, "large" mode has no much value for you and and you agree to remove it.
Did I get you right?
Nope. I had panel_size=large set. I like big & fat buttons. However, I just tried tiny & small, but think medium is the best option for this current monitor resolution. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
participants (4)
-
jcid＠dillo.org -
mr_semantics＠hotmail.com -
rogerx.oss＠gmail.com -
tuna＠supertunaman.com