Hi! It seems that I'm getting old that I tried to set the option "allow_white_bg" to "false"; to find out that the replacement color is hardcoded! If I haven't missed something, and noone objets, I'll add a prefs variable "white_bg_replacement". BTW: is there a reason that there is still a prefs variable "bg_color", while fonts (the actual fonts, not the font classes) are now defined by CSS? Sebastian
Hi Sebastian,
Gesendet: Montag, 19. August 2013 um 10:32 Uhr Von: "Sebastian Geerken" <sgeerken at dillo.org> An: dillo-dev at dillo.org Betreff: [Dillo-dev] allow_white_bg
Hi!
It seems that I'm getting old that I tried to set the option "allow_white_bg" to "false"; to find out that the replacement color is hardcoded! If I haven't missed something, and noone objets, I'll add a prefs variable "white_bg_replacement".
Sounds good. white_bg_replacement would replace allow_white_bg, right?
BTW: is there a reason that there is still a prefs variable "bg_color", while fonts (the actual fonts, not the font classes) are now defined by CSS?
There are some differences in behavior between setting bg_color option and having body {background-color: <something>} in style.css. I'm not sure whether they justify the existence of the bg_color option. But I can't really decide, as I don't use bg_color normally. Cheers, Johannes
On Mo, Aug 19, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
It seems that I'm getting old that I tried to set the option "allow_white_bg" to "false"; to find out that the replacement color is hardcoded! If I haven't missed something, and noone objets, I'll add a prefs variable "white_bg_replacement".
Sounds good. white_bg_replacement would replace allow_white_bg, right?
Currently, I've added another option, so you must specify something like: allow_white_bg=NO white_bg_replacement=0xf0f0d0 The standard for white_bg_replacement is 0xe0e0a3, the value hard-coded before. Your suggestion sounds good to, only to specify white_bg_replacement, which has a standard value of "undefined". I'm open to both. Sebastian
On Mo, Aug 19, 2013, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Mo, Aug 19, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
It seems that I'm getting old that I tried to set the option "allow_white_bg" to "false"; to find out that the replacement color is hardcoded! If I haven't missed something, and noone objets, I'll add a prefs variable "white_bg_replacement".
Sounds good. white_bg_replacement would replace allow_white_bg, right?
Currently, I've added another option, so you must specify something like:
allow_white_bg=NO white_bg_replacement=0xf0f0d0
The standard for white_bg_replacement is 0xe0e0a3, the value hard-coded before.
Your suggestion sounds good to[o], only to specify white_bg_replacement, which has a standard value of "undefined". I'm open to both.
I've pushed my variant (two variables); feel free to change. Back to floats ... Sebastian
participants (2)
-
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de -
sgeerken＠dillo.org