Hi I've been running Dillo 0.7.3 from a rpm on a Redhat 9.0 for a while, but wanted to try out the tab/frame patch. So I downloaded the Dillo tarball, applied the patch, ran configure, make and make install. No problem. Since the tarball suggest /usr/local/bin and the rpm-version /usr/bin I'm able to have both versions simultaneously. However: *** ls -lh /usr/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 297K <blah blah> ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> *** A twelve fold increase in size!!!!? Obviously I did something stupid, but what? Gcc is 3.2.2. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) Mike Eriksen <kme3@mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote:
ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah>
try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo` RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your filesize dramatically. Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:38:15 +0200 (MEST) Mike Eriksen <kme3@mail.kemi.dtu.dk> wrote:
ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah>
try (as root) `strip /usr/local/bin/dillo`
RPM strips the binaries, a normal install doesn't mostly. It should reduce your filesize dramatically.
Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/ "...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"
Aha! Learned something new... Now it is 333K :-) Thanks a lot. Mike -- Thinstation FAQ maintainer http://thinstation.sourceforge.net - a light, full featured linux based thin client OS
Hi ! I'd love to give this patch a try, but unfortunatelity I can't patch the sourcecode. Here's what I do: jojo@jojo ~/dillo-0.7.3 $ patch < dillo-0.7.3-tabs.patch patching file ChangeLog patching file Makefile.in patching file aclocal.m4 patching file autogen.sh patching file configure patching file configure.in patching file dillorc patching file Browser_Frames.txt patching file Browser_Tabs.txt patching file DilloDoc.txt patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] (press enter) Apply anyway? [n] y Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 13. Hunk #3 FAILED at 122. Hunk #4 FAILED at 212. Hunk #5 FAILED at 220. 5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej patching file README Hunk #1 FAILED at 18. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file README.rej patching file Makefile.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] [goes on...] Well, don't know why this is. I'd love to hear answer from you how to resolve this :) Thanks a lot for your help! Cu
Mike Eriksen wrote:
ls -lh /usr/local/bin/dillo -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.4M <blah blah> *** A twelve fold increase in size!!!!? Obviously I did something stupid, but what? Gcc is 3.2.2.
Mike
strip is your friend... (as root) strip /usr/local/bin/dillo You probably compiled with "-g" (means "include debugging information") somewhere in the CFLAGS Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank@unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
participants (5)
-
Frank de Lange -
johannes leimbach -
landy -
Mike Eriksen -
Ralph Slooten